Cited by 101Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesNursing care and research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision-making for receiving paid home care for dementia in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lockdown imposed in the UK on the 23rd of March and associated public health measures of social distancing are likely to have had a great impact on care provision. The aim of this study was to explore the decision-making processes of continued paid home care support for dementia in the time of COVID-19. METHODS: Unpaid carers caring for a person living with dementia (PLWD) who were accessing paid home care before COVID-19 and residing in the UK were eligible to take part. Participants were interviewed over the phone and asked about their experiences of using paid home care services before and since COVID-19, and their decision-making processes of accessing paid home care since the outbreak and public health restrictions. RESULTS: Fifteen unpaid carers, who were also accessing paid care support for the PLWD before COVID-19, were included in the analysis. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: (1) Risk; (2) Making difficult choices and risk management; and (3) Implications for unpaid carers. Many unpaid carers decided to discontinue paid carers entering the home due to the risk of infection, resulting in unpaid carers having to pick up the care hours to support the person living with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report on the impact of COVID-19 on paid home care changes in dementia. Findings raise implications for providing better Personal Protective Equipment for paid carers, and to support unpaid carers better in their roles, with the pandemic likely to stay in place for the foreseeable future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12877-020-01719-0

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. London, England: ADI; 2016.
  2. Alzheimer’s Society. Dementia UK: An Update. London, England: Alzheimer’s Society; 2014.
  3. Society A’s. Women’s unpaid dementia care and the impact on employment. Alzheimer’s Society: London, England; 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Giebel, C., Hanna, K., Cannon, J., Eley, R., Tetlow, H., Gaughan, A., Komuravelli, A., Shenton, J., Rogers, C., Butchard, S., Callaghan, S., Limbert, S., Rajagopal, M., Ward, K., Shaw, L., Whittington, R., Hughes, M., & Gabbay, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • The Lewy Body Society (GB)
  • Dementia Australia (AU)
  • North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • National Museums Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Giebel, Clarissa
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2020-09-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
333-333
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083963939
Cited by
101
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 2
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR ARC NWC)
  • University of Liverpool (COVID-19 Strategic Research Fund)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia, COVID-19 pandemic, informal caregivers, decision-making, health care access, infection risk, personal protective equipment, caregiver burden, lockdown, health care delivery
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Dementia, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Caregivers, Coronavirus Infections, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review