Cited by 14Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Amphotericin B plus fluorocytosine combined with voriconazole for the treatment of non-HIV and non-transplant-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a retrospective study

Open access
Liu, Junyu, Liu, Jia, Su, Xiaohong, Yang, Lu, Wang, Yijie, Wang, Anni, Xu, Xiaofeng, Li, Min +2 more·2022·BMC Neurology

Abstract

Background: Our previous study explored Amphotericin B (AMB) plus 5-flucytosine (5-FC) combined with fluconazole (FLU) therapy in the induction period, which seemed to be better than the previous AMB + 5-FC antifungal therapy in non-HIV and non-transplant-associated CM. However, based on our clinical finding, the outcomes of some CM patients who received AMB plus 5-FC combined with FLU antifungal therapy were still poor. Therefore, we need to explore new antifungal methods in non-HIV and non-transplant-associated CM during the induction period. Methods: Clinical data from 148 patients admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat Sen University from January 2011 to December 2020 were collected. These patients were stratified based on antifungal treatment methods in the induction period (group I with AMB + 5-FC + VOR, group II with AMB + 5-FC + FLU, group III with AMB + 5-FC). Results: The first hospitalization time of Group I (median: 25 days, IQR: 20–34.5) was significantly shorter than that of Group II (median: 43 days, IQR: 29–62) (p < 0.001) and Group III (median: 50.5 days, IQR: 43–77.5) (p < 0.001). After 2 weeks of follow-up, Group I (26/49) had more patients reaching CSF clearance (p = 0.004) than Group II (18/71) and Group III (7/28). In multivariable analysis, Group II (OR: 3.35, 95%CI 1.43–7.82, p = 0.005) and Group III (OR: 3.8, 95%CI 1.23–11.81, p = 0.021) were associated with higher risk about CSF clearance failure at 2 weeks follow-up than Group I. After 10 weeks of follow-up, the incidence of hypokalemia in Group I was significantly lower than that in Group II (p = 0.003) and Group III (p = 0.004), and the incidence of gastrointestinal discomfort in Group I was significantly lower than that in Group II (p = 0.004). Conclusion: AMB plus 5-FC combined with VOR may rapidly improve clinical manifestation, decrease CSF OP and clear the cryptococci in CSF during the early phase, substantially shorten the hospitalization time, and reduce the incidences of hypokalemia and gastrointestinal discomfort.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12883-022-02803-1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expanding scope to all failed antifungal treatments, such as adding 5-FC or amphotericin B to fluconazole monotherapy, alleviates mortality rate and achieves up to 90% efficacy.

    “Expanding the scope to all failed antifungal treatments, such as adding 5-FC or amphotericin B to fluconazole monotherapy, alleviates mortality rate and achieves up to 90% efficacy [177,178,179].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [179]

    The Methods (Treatment strategies) and Results compare combination regimens, and the Results report better early CSF clearance with amphotericin B, 5-FC and voriconazole. But the study does not compare either addition against fluconazole monotherapy, show reduced mortality, or report 90% treatment efficacy; the Results state that treatment response did not differ significantly among groups. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Liu, J., Su, X., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Wang, A., Xu, X., Li, M., Jiang, Y., & Peng, F.
Affiliations
Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Ying
  • Peng, Fuhua
Venue
BMC Neurology
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
274-274
ISSN
1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286461852
Cited by
14
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071265)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
cryptococcal meningitis, amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, voriconazole, fluconazole, CSF clearance, hypokalemia, treatment duration, risk factors for treatment failure, combination antifungal therapy, cryptococcal antigen serology, cerebrospinal fluid cytology
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Flucytosine, Humans, Hypokalemia, Retrospective Studies, Fluconazole, Treatment Outcome, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review