Association between the cut-off value of the first trimester fasting plasma glucose level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study from southern China
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Our previous studies have suggested that the first trimester fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and is a predictor of GDM. The aim of the present study was to provide valuable insights into the accuracy of the first trimester FPG level in the screening and diagnosis of GDM in southern China. Methods: This retrospective study included pregnant women who had their first trimester FPG level recorded at 9–13+6 weeks and underwent screening for GDM using the 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between the 24th and 28th gestational weeks. Differences between the GDM and non-GDM groups were assessed by Student’s t test and the chi-squared test according to the nature of the variables. A restricted cubic spine was used to explore the relationship between the first trimester FPG level and the odds ratio (OR) of GDM in pregnant women. Cut-off values of first trimester FPG were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: The medical records of 28,030 pregnant women were analysed, and 4,669 (16.66%) of them were diagnosed with GDM. The average first trimester FPG level was 4.62 ± 0.37 mmol/L. The OR of GDM increased with increasing first trimester FPG levels and with a value of first trimester FPG of approximately 4.6 mmol/L, which was equal to 1 (Chi-Square = 665.79, P < 0.001), and then started to increase rapidly afterwards. The ROC curve for fasting plasma glucose in the first trimester (4.735 mmol/L) for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women was 0.608 (95% CI: 0.598–0.617), with a sensitivity of 0.490 and a specificity of 0.676. Conclusion: Based on the research, we recommend that all pregnant women undergo FPG testing in the first trimester, particularly at the first antenatal visit. Furthermore, we suggest that the risks of GDM should be given increased attention and management as soon as the first trimester FPG value is more than 4.7 mmol/L. First trimester FPG levels should be considered a screening marker when diagnosing GDM in pregnant women but this needs to be confirmed by more prospective studies. These factors may have a significant impact on the clinical treatment of pregnant women.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many scientific papers emphasize the validity of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester of pregnancy.
“Currently, there are many scientific papers emphasizing the validity of screening for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy [6,7,8,9].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Metzger, B. E., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Trimble, E. R., Chaovarindr, U., Coustan, D. R., Hadden, D. R., McCance, D. R., Hod, M., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2009) · Obstetric Anesthesia Digest · doi:10.1097/01.aoa.0000344706.95925.dc · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Mills, J. L., Jovanovic, L., Knopp, R., Aarons, J., Conley, M., Park, E., Lee, Y. J., Holmes, L., Simpson, J. L., & Metzger, B. (1998) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/s0026-0495(98)90290-6 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [1]Zhu WW Yang HX Wei YM Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in china Diabetes Care 2013 36 3 586 590 10.2337/dc12-1157 23193214 PMC3579369 · DOI · Paper page
- [3]Bellamy L Casas JP Hingorani AD Williams D Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet (London, England) 2009 373 9677 1773 1779 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5 19465232 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynaecologists. Number 37, August 2002. (Replaces Practice Bulletin Number 32, November 2001). Thyroid disease in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynaecology. 2002;100(2):387–396. 12166417
- [5]Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 Diabetes Care 2018 41 Suppl 1 S13 s27 29222373
- [6]Metzger BE Gabbe SG Persson B International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy Diabetes Care 2010 33 3 676 682 10.2337/dc09-1848 20190296 PMC2827530 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Agarwal MM Punnose J Sukhija K Sharma A Choudhary NK Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Using the Fasting Plasma Glucose Level to Simplify the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Diagnostic Algorithm in an Adult South Asian Population Can J Diabetes 2018 42 5 500 504 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.12.009 29545111 · DOI
- [8]Agarwal MM Weigl B Hod M Gestational diabetes screening: the low-cost algorithm International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2011 115 Suppl 1 S30 33 10.1016/S0020-7292(11)60009-X 22099438 · DOI
- [9]Benhalima K Van Crombrugge P Moyson C The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Glucose Challenge Test in a Universal Two-Step Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the 2013 World Health Organization Criteria Diabetes Care 2018 41 7 e111 e112 10.2337/dc18-0556 29748432 · DOI
- [10]Li M Lan JR Liang JL Xiong XL Diagnostic accuracy of fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020 24 21 11172 11186 33215435
- [11]Yang W Lu J Weng J Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China N Engl J Med 2010 362 12 1090 1101 10.1056/NEJMoa0908292 20335585 · DOI · Paper page
- [12]Sun T Meng F Zhao H Elevated First-Trimester Neutrophil Count Is Closely Associated With the Development of Maternal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Diabetes 2020 69 7 1401 1410 10.2337/db19-0976 32332157 · DOI
- [13]Metzger BE Lowe LP Dyer AR Hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes N Engl J Med 2008 358 19 1991 2002 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 18463375 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Tong JN, Wu LL, Chen YX, et al. Fasting plasma glucose in the first trimester is related to gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Endocrine. 2021. PMC8763802 34342804
- [17]Wong T Ross GP Jalaludin BB Flack JR The clinical significance of overt diabetes in pregnancy Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2013 30 4 468 474 10.1111/dme.12110 23278460 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Li P Lin S Li L Cui J Zhou S Fan JJPjoms First-trimester fasting plasma glucose as a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus and the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes 2019 35 1 95 PMC6408635 30881404
- [19]Cosson E Carbillon L Valensi P High Fasting Plasma Glucose during Early Pregnancy: A Review about Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus J Diabetes Res 2017 2017 8921712 10.1155/2017/8921712 29181414 PMC5664285 · DOI
- [20]Song C Li J Leng J Ma RC Yang X Lifestyle intervention can reduce the risk of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Obesity reviews: an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2016 17 10 960 969 10.1111/obr.12442 27417680 · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Rayanagoudar G Hashi AA Zamora J Khan KS Hitman GA Thangaratinam S Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women Diabetologia 2016 59 7 1403 1411 10.1007/s00125-016-3927-2 27073002 PMC4901120 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Noctor E Crowe C Carmody LA Abnormal glucose tolerance postgestational diabetes mellitus as defined by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria Eur J Endocrinol 2016 175 4 287 297 10.1530/EJE-15-1260 27422889 · DOI · Paper page
- [23]Harrison CL Lombard CB East C Boyle J Teede HJ Risk stratification in early pregnancy for women at increased risk of gestational diabetes Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015 107 1 61 68 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.006 25444356 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tong, J.-N., Chen, Y.-X., Guan, X.-N., Liu, K., Yin, A.-Q., Zhang, H.-F., Wu, L.-L., & Niu, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
- ORCID
- Liu, Kan
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2022-07-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 540-540
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9252059
- OpenAlex
- W4283805247
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830041)
- Shen Zhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Special Funding for Future Industry (JCYJ20170412140326739)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, cut-off values, GDM screening, diagnostic accuracy, oral glucose tolerance test, pregnant women, South China, risk prediction, prenatal care
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, China, Fasting, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review