The efficacy of collaborative psychological interventions in reducing anxiety levels in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Anxiety during pregnancy can be harmful to both mother and baby, with anxiety rates remaining high despite psychological intervention efforts. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative and single psychological interventions in reducing anxiety compared with standard antenatal care. Methods: A literature search was conducted in four databases (Scopus, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ScienceDirect) for relevant studies published from 2016 to January 2024. The population in this review is pregnant women with anxiety who received psychological interventions either from a single health worker or involving collaboration. Psychological interventions were compared with standard antenatal care with maternal anxiety outcome scores to measure the efficacy of pre-post psychological intervention methods, with measurements taken only during pregnancy. The study designs included the use of the Randomized Controlled Trials method. This study restricted articles to languages other than English and used a review design and pharmacological interventions. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment using RoB 2. Statistical analysis was conducted using R-Studio. Data analysis was performed using meta-count packages with a random effect model. Results: There were 14 eligible articles identified from the initial 3,346 records, with 1 article excluded from the meta-analysis. Psychological interventions were effective in reducing anxiety compared with standard care (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) − 0.64, 95% CI − 0.98–−0.31). Analysis by type of intervention group showed differences between the two groups in mindfulness interventions (SMD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.8–−0.31), motivational interviewing (SMD − 0.70, 95% CI − 1.08–−0.33), and supportive counseling (SMD − 0.73, 95% CI − 1.19–0.28). There were no differences between the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (SMD − 0.80, 95% CI (− 1.80–0.19)) and Thinking Healthy Program intervention groups (SMD − 0.35, 95% CI − 0.81–0.11). Analysis of interventions conducted by a multidisciplinary team (collaborative) showed higher efficacy (SMD − 0.88, 95% CI − 1.60–−0.15) compared with a single professional (noncollaborative) (SMD − 0.47, 95% CI − 0.72–−0.22). Conclusions: Collaborative interventions show better efficacy than a single intervention, with psychological therapy being more effective in reducing anxiety rather than standard antenatal care. Future research should improve the cooperative approach and examine its long-term effects on maternal and newborn outcomes. Trial registration: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration code CRD42024497417.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated effective in promoting mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, in the general population, and among adolescents.
“Indeed, various psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated effective in promoting mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, in the general population [8], and among adolescents [16].”
From Implementation of a mental health promotion intervention in a high-risk pregnancy unit: the “Ombrelles” program (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The Results (Intervention effect) report that psychological interventions significantly reduced anxiety in pregnant participants. But the Results (Primary outcomes) say the meta-analysis included only anxiety measurements during pregnancy, and the Discussion says it is unclear whether benefits persist after delivery. The paper therefore does not establish effectiveness postpartum or in the general population; the adolescent claim is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380 · see citing works
Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model
Viechtbauer, W. (2005) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986030003261 · Cited by 1,699 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The amount of heterogeneity (i.e., n τ2), estimated using the Q heterogeneity test and the I 2 statistic, was also reported [37, 38].”
Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Dennis, C., Falah‐Hassani, K., & Shiri, R. (2017) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Andrade, C. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.20f13681 · Cited by 841 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SMD is usually interpreted using Cohen’s criteria: 0.2 indicates a small effect, 0.5 indicates a medium effect, and 0.8 or higher indicates a significant effect [35, 36].”
InfluentialDing, X.-X., Wu, Y.-L., Xu, S.-J., Zhu, R.-P., Jia, X.-M., Zhang, S.-F., Huang, K., Zhu, P., Hao, J.-H., & Tao, F.-B. (2014) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.027 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-14-36 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis
Copas, J. (2000) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Minozzi, S., Cinquini, M., Gianola, S., Gonzalez-Lorenzo, M., & Banzi, R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Grigoriadis, S., Graves, L., Peer, M., Mamisashvili, L., Tomlinson, G., Vigod, S. N., Dennis, C.-L., Steiner, M., Brown, C., Cheung, A., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.17r12011 · Cited by 404 · cited 3× · see citing works
“MIs promote awareness and regulation of emotions and reduce cortisol levels and stress, making them particularly suitable for pregnant women who experience fluctuating anxiety due to hormonal and physiological changes during pregnancy [54].”
InfluentialDubber, S., Reck, C., Müller, M., & Gawlik, S. (2015) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0445-4 · Cited by 400 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Although the interventions are effective in reducing anxiety during pregnancy, it is unclear whether these benefits persist after delivery or translate into better outcomes for mothers and infants [8].”
Pregnancy-related anxiety during COVID-19: a nationwide survey of 2740 pregnant women
Moyer, C. A., Compton, S. D., Kaselitz, E. B., & Muzik, M. (2020) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-020-01073-5 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Pregnancy-related anxiety: A concept analysis
Bayrampour, H., Ali, E., McNeil, D. A., Benzies, K., MacQUEEN, G. M., & Tough, S. (2015) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.023 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Gong, Y., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Shen, B., Xian, J., & Ding, Y. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.129 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Duncan, L. G., Cohn, M. A., Chao, M. T., Cook, J. G., Riccobono, J., & Bardacke, N. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1319-3 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Examining the relationship between antenatal anxiety and postnatal depression
Austin, M., Tully, L. A., & Parker, G. B. (2006) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.015 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Nyamtema, A., Urassa, D. P., & van Roosmalen, J. (2011) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-30 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Çankaya, S., & Şimşek, B. (2020) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/1054773820916984 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Forsell, E., Bendix, M., Holländare, F., Szymanska von Schultz, B., Nasiell, J., Blomdahl-Wetterholm, M., Eriksson, C., Kvarned, S., Lindau van der Linden, J., Söderberg, E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.013 · Cited by 175 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In selection bias, nine studies were at low risk, two studies [49, 52] were at high risk, and three [43, 45, 46] were at moderate risk.”
InfluentialSun, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Q., Bazzano, A. N., & Cao, F. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23410 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Cortisol and DHEA-S levels in pregnant women with severe anxiety
Leff, P., Flores‐Ramos, M., Carrasco, A. E. Á., Martínez, M. L., Takashima, M. F. S., Coronel, F., Farfán-Labonne, B. E., Dosal, J. A. Z., Chávez-Peón, P. B., Morales, S. G., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02788-6 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Nielsen-Scott, M., Fellmeth, G. L., Opondo, C., & Alderdice, F. A. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.032 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Behruzi, R., Klam, S., Dehertog, M., Jimenez, V., & Hatem, M. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Interprofessional Collaboration
(2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203420690 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Atif, N., Nazir, H., Zafar, S., Chaudhri, R., Atiq, M., Mullany, L. C., Rowther, A. A., Malik, A., Surkan, P. J., & Rahman, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00927 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Missler, M., van Straten, A., Denissen, J., Donker, T., & Beijers, R. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03341-9 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other psychological interventions with psychoeducational models can reduce anxiety in pregnant women and prevent postpartum depression [21].”
Scherer, S., Alder, J., Gaab, J., Berger, T., Ihde, K., & Urech, C. (2016) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.10.011 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Li, Y., Wang, J., Mao, F., Wu, L., Huang, Y., Sun, J., & Cao, F. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/41298 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Buultjens, M., Farouque, A., Karimi, L., Whitby, L., Milgrom, J., & Erbas, B. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.004 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Pan, W., Lin, L.-C., Kuo, L.-Y., Chiu, M.-J., & Ling, P. (2023) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05873-2 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Burger, H., Verbeek, T., Aris-Meijer, J. L., Beijers, C., Mol, B. W., Hollon, S. D., Ormel, J., van Pampus, M. G., & Bockting, C. L. H. (2020) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.260 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Prenatal stress self-help mindfulness intervention via social media: a randomized controlled trial
Zhang, X., Lin, P., Sun, J., Sun, Y., Shao, D., Cao, D., & Cao, F. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1952947 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hulsbosch, L. P., Nyklı́ček, I., Potharst, E. S., Meems, M., Boekhorst, M. G. B. M., & Pop, V. J. M. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-2843-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Abdollahi, S., Faramarzi, M., Delavar, M. A., Bakouei, F., Chehrazi, M., & Gholinia, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00787 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Sbrilli, M. D., Duncan, L. G., Bardacke, N., & Laurent, H. K. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03318-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Esfandiari, M., Faramarzi, M., Amiri, F. N., Parsian, H., Chehrazi, M., Pasha, H., Omidvar, S., & Gholinia, H. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.024 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Emphasizing mindfulness training in acceptance relieves anxiety and depression during pregnancy
Yang, M., Zhou, X., Ye, C., Li, J., Sun, S., & Yu, X. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114540 · Cited by 29 · cited 7× · see citing works
“In this review, mindfulness-based approaches emerged as consistently effective, which is in line with previous research that highlights their benefits in reducing anxiety, depression, and stress across a range of populations [48].”
InfluentialKwee, J., & McBride, H. L. (2015) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105315586211 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Callanan, F., Tuohy, T., Bright, A., & Grealish, A. (2021) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.103169 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Boran, P., Dönmez, M., Barış, H. E., Us, M. C., Altaş, Z. M., Nisar, A., Atif, N., Sikander, S., Hıdıroğlu, S., Save, D., et al. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04499-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Klatter, C. K., van Ravesteyn, L. M., & Stekelenburg, J. (2022) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-022-01251-7 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Avalos, L. A., Nance, N., Badon, S. E., Young‐Wolff, K. C., Ames, J., Zhu, Y., Hedderson, M. M., Ferrara, A. M., Zerbo, O., Greenberg, M., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604433 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Goldstein, E., Brown, R., Lennon, R. P., & Zgierska, A. E. (2022) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12664 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Sapkota, D., Baird, K. M., Saito, A., Rijal, P., & Anderson, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520948151 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Bayat, A., Amiri-Farahani, L., Soleimani, M., Eshraghi, N., & Haghani, S. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04206-5 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wu, N. Q., Huang, R., Shan, S., Li, Y., & Jiang, H. (2022) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101545 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Wang, S. L., Sun, M. Y., Huang, X., Zhang, D. M., Yang, L., Xu, T., Pan, X. P., & Zheng, R. (2023) · PubMed · doi:10.3967/bes2023.041 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Literature Review: Effect of Interprofessional Collaboration Implementation of Patient Services
Purnasiwi, D., & Jenie, I. M. (2021) · The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health · doi:10.20473/ijosh.v10i2.2021.265-272 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Gaucher, L., Dupont, C., Gautier, S., Baumann, S., & Rousseau, A. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04772-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fitriasnani, M. E., Dewi, R. K., Aminah, S., Dewi, T. G., & Lestari, D. (2022) · Journal of Global Research in Public Health · doi:10.30994/jgrph.v7i2.413 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [26]Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley Sons; 2017.
- [35]Chittaranjan A. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;77:22–7. 32965803
- [46]Tam WH, Lee DTS, Chiu HFK, Ma KC, Lee A, Chung TKH. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational counselling on the management of women with suboptimal childbirth outcomes. Hong Kong Med J. 2006;12:S33–6.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rizzi, S., Nicoletti, A. E., Luca, C. D., Poggianella, S., Dalmonego, C., Paoli, C., Marroni, D., Burlon, B., Chiodega, V., Dallafior, M., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1633229 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ammar, R., Béland, J., Janvier, A., Herba, C. M., St-Pierre, H., Roddier, K., Morin, L., St-André, M., Côté, S., Boucoiran, I., et al. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-08378-2
“Indeed, various psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated effective in promoting mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, in the general population [8], and among adolescents [16].”
Integrating minds: collaborative psychological care to combat perinatal anxiety
Naser, E. (2025) · Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2025-104370
Maternal psychological distress on delayed onset of lactation II: A meta-analysis
Chen, C., Deng, Y., Li, W., Li, X., Zhang, S., Yi, J., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000042839 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Parmawati, I., Afiyanti, Y., & Rachmawati, I. N. (2025) · Nurse Media Journal of Nursing · doi:10.14710/nmjn.v15i3.60904
DEPRESSÃO PÓS-PARTO E REDE DE APOIO: O PAPEL DO APOIO PSICOLÓGICO NA RECUPERAÇÃO MATERNA
da Silva, K. B., Lacerda, H. C., Barroso, N. P., & Costa, F. L. P. (2025) · Revista interdisciplinar em saúde · doi:10.35621/23587490.v12.n1.p2072-2085
Expectations predict early pregnancy-related symptom burden
Mora, M. C. S., Schymanski, V., Albers, R., Beth, B., Garthus‐Niegel, S., Crum, A. J., & Autzen, L. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57961-w
Shi, Y., Lau, Y., Chan, S. L., Zhou, L., Au, M. Y. J., & Leung, H. K. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105650
Singh, K. P., & Dubey, A. (2026) · Neurotoxicity Research · doi:10.1007/s12640-026-00820-3
Zorzo, I., de Oliveira, A. S., Rodrigues, M. E. B., & Yonegura, W. H. T. (2026) · Femina · doi:10.61622/0100-72545482026011
Zhang, L., Tao, H., Zhu, L., Liu, S., & 阳彦辉 (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000050992
- Authors
- Firrahmawati, L., Wasityastuti, W., Kandarina, B. J. I., Marti, E., Chandra, L. A., & Sulistianingsih, A.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Wasityastuti, Widya
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2025-04-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 431-431
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11992786
- OpenAlex
- W4409348940
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (02081/J5.2.3./BPI.06/9/2022)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- maternal anxiety, pregnancy, psychological intervention, collaborative care, multidisciplinary team, prenatal care, mindfulness, motivational interviewing, supportive counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, intervention efficacy, maternal mental health, standardized mean difference, random effects models, subgroup analysis, effect size heterogeneity, publication bias, risk of bias assessment
- MeSH terms
- Psychosocial Intervention, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pregnant People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
