Cited by 1353D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Therapy response testing of breast cancer in a 3D high-throughput perfused microfluidic platform

Open access
Lanz, Henriette L., Saleh, Anthony, Kramer, Bart, Cairns, Junmei, Ng, Chee Ping, Yu, Jia, Trietsch, Sebastiaan J., Hankemeier, Thomas +4 more·2017·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer among women. Currently, there are only a few models used for therapy selection, and they are often poor predictors of therapeutic response or take months to set up and assay. In this report, we introduce a microfluidic OrganoPlate® platform for extracellular matrix (ECM) embedded tumor culture under perfusion as an initial study designed to investigate the feasibility of adapting this technology for therapy selection. METHODS: The triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231 and HCC1937 were selected based on their different BRCA1 and P53 status, and were seeded in the platform. We evaluate seeding densities, ECM composition (Matrigel®, BME2rgf, collagen I) and biomechanical (perfusion vs static) conditions. We then exposed the cells to a series of anti-cancer drugs (paclitaxel, olaparib, cisplatin) and compared their responses to those in 2D cultures. Finally, we generated cisplatin dose responses in 3D cultures of breast cancer cells derived from 2 PDX models. RESULTS: The microfluidic platform allows the simultaneous culture of 96 perfused micro tissues, using limited amounts of material, enabling drug screening of patient-derived material. 3D cell culture viability is improved by constant perfusion of the medium. Furthermore, the drug response of these triple negative breast cancer cells was attenuated by culture in 3D and differed from that observed in 2D substrates. CONCLUSIONS: We have investigated the use of a high-throughput organ-on-a-chip platform to select therapies. Our results have raised the possibility to use this technology in personalized medicine to support selection of appropriate drugs and to predict response to therapy in a real time fashion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12885-017-3709-3

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D-cultured breast tumor chips can be used to predict antitumor drug responses.

    “Therefore, researchers propose that 3D-cultured breast tumor chips can be used to predict antitumor drug responses211,212.”
  • The drug response of breast tumor cells is weakened in 3D culture compared with 2D culture.

    “The researchers compared the effects of several antitumor drugs, such as paclitaxel, olaparib, and cisplatin, in 2D- and 3D-cultured breast tumor cells and found that the drug response was weakened in 3D-cultured tumor cells.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanz, H. L., Saleh, A., Kramer, B., Cairns, J., Ng, C. P., Yu, J., Trietsch, S. J., Hankemeier, T., Joore, J., Vulto, P., Weinshilboum, R., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Mimetas (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2017-11-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
709-709
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765957053
Cited by
135
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1 CA196640, U19 GM61388)
  • Mayo Clinic (Center for Individualized Medicine Pharmacogenomics Translational Program)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, organ-on-a-chip, extracellular matrix, 3D cell culture, drug response prediction, treatment selection, cisplatin, paclitaxel, olaparib, patient-derived xenografts, personalized medicine, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231 cells, HCC1937, BRCA1, p53, Matrigel, type I collagen, perfusion
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Cisplatin, Collagen, Drug Combinations, Extracellular Matrix, Female, Humans, Laminin, Mutation, Phthalazines, Piperazines, Prognosis, Proteoglycans, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Paclitaxel, Cell Culture Techniques, BRCA1 Protein, Microfluidics, Cell Line, Tumor, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review