Cited by 72Mental Health Treatment and AccessGlobal Health Workforce IssuesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Piloting a mental health training programme for community health workers in South Africa: an exploration of changes in knowledge, confidence and attitudes

Open access
Sibeko, Goodman, Milligan, Peter D., Roelofse, Marinda, Molefe, Lezel, Jonker, Deborah, Ipser, Jonathan, Lund, Crick, Stein, Dan J.·2018·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of trained mental health workers in spite of the significant contribution of psychiatric disorders to the global disease burden. Task shifting, through the delegation of health care tasks to less specialised health workers such as community health workers (CHWs), is a promising approach to address the human resource shortage. CHWs in the Western Cape province of South Africa provide comprehensive chronic support which includes that for mental illness, but have thus far not received standardized mental health training. It is unknown whether a structured mental health training programme would be acceptable and feasible, and result improved knowledge, confidence and attitudes amongst CHWs. METHODS: We developed and piloted a mental health training programme for CHWs, in line with the UNESCO guidelines; the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme and the South African National framework for CHW training. In our quasi-experimental (before-after) cohort intervention study we measured outcomes at the start and end of training included: 1) Mental health knowledge, measured through the use of case vignettes and the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule; 2) confidence, measured with the Mental Health Nurse Clinical Confidence Scale; and 3) attitudes, measured with the Community Attitudes towards the Mentally Ill Scale. Knowledge measures were repeated 3 months later. Acceptability data were obtained from daily evaluation questionnaires and a training evaluation questionnaire, while feasibility was measured by participant attendance at training sessions. RESULTS: Fifty-eight CHWs received the training, with most (n = 56, 97.0%) attending at least 7 of the 8 sessions. Most participants (n = 29, 63.04%) demonstrated significant improvement in knowledge, which was sustained at 3-months. There was significant improvement in confidence, along with changes in attitude, indicating improved benevolence, reduced social restrictiveness, and increased tolerance to rehabilitation of the mentally ill in the community but there was no change in authoritarian attitudes. The training was acceptable and feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health training was successful in improving knowledge, confidence and attitudes amongst trained CHWs. The training was acceptable and feasible. Further controlled studies are required to evaluate the impact of such training on patient health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR PACTR201610001834198 , Registered 26 October 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-018-1772-1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Bhutta ZA Lassi ZS Pariyo G Luis H Global experience of community health Workers for Delivery of health related millennium development goals: a systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into National Health Systems World Heal Organ 2010 2017 8/3/ 377

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sibeko, G., Milligan, P. D., Roelofse, M., Molefe, L., Jonker, D., Ipser, J., Lund, C., & Stein, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Sibeko, Goodman
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
191-191
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808380477
Cited by
72
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
community health workers, mental health training, task shifting, mental health workforce shortage, mental health knowledge, clinical confidence, attitudes toward mental illness, training acceptability, training feasibility, Western Cape
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Health Workers, Community Mental Health Services, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, South Africa, Needs Assessment, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review