Cited by 25Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Association of internet gaming disorder with impulsivity: role of risk preferences

Open access
Zhu, Lin, Zhu, Yuqiong, Li, Shuxuan, Jiang, Yulian, Mei, Xian, Wang, Yuting, Yang, Dengxian, Zhao, Jing +2 more·2023·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is a formal mental disorder leading to personal and social impairment. Although it shares similar physical and psychosocial effects to substance use disorder, the psychological mechanisms underlying IGD remain unclear, although several researches have made significant contributions to its understanding. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between IGD, impulsive personality and risk preference of medical college students in China, from a questionnaire-based investigation. Methods: Based on the cluster random sampling method, a questionnaire survey was conducted among medical college students in Northern Anhui, China from September 3 to October 27, 2020. The questionnaires included the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (IGD-20), Chinese revised of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11), and risk appetite index (RPI). Perform independent sample t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation analysis, and moderating effect analysis using SPSS 23.0. P < 0. 05 is considered statistically significant. Results: 624 participants completed the survey, including 257 males (41.19%) and 367 females (58.81%). All participants were between 18 and 24 years. We found that in IGD and its six different dimensions and RPI, males scored significantly higher than females. Additionally, our finding revealed there is statistical significance in IGD and impulsiveness between gaming group with game time greater than or equal to 4 h and non-gaming group. The IGD and its six different dimensions, among which all except for mood modification are positively correlated with impulsiveness and RPI. Mediating effects indicate that RPI plays a partial mediating role between motor impulsiveness and IGD. Conclusion: The findings shows that there is a certain relationship between impulsivity and RPI, as well as IGD and its dimensions. RPI may be a mediator between impulsivity and IGD, and men have higher IGD. The findings supported the compensatory hypothesis. These findings may contribute to further research and development of intervention and prevention measures for IGD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-023-05265-y

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most adolescents who engage in video gaming do not develop internet gaming disorder, and problematic outcomes are primarily confined to those with risk factors such as high impulsivity or pre-existing mental health conditions.

    “However, most adolescents who engage in video gaming do not develop IGD, and problematic outcomes are primarily confined to those with risk factors, such as high impulsivity or pre-existing mental health conditions [9, 12].”

    From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Background (page unavailable) reports IGD in 17.0% of adolescent game players in China, supporting the point that most do not develop it. The Background and Discussion link impulsivity to IGD, but the paper does not establish that problematic outcomes are primarily confined to people with risk factors. It describes depression and anxiety as possible consequences of IGD, not pre-existing conditions that increase risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, L., Zhu, Y., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Mei, X., Wang, Y., Yang, D., Zhao, J., Mu, L., & Wang, W.
Affiliations
  • Bengbu Medical College (CN)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Wenjuan
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2023-10-16
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
754-754
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387666777
Cited by
25
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, impulsivity, risk preferences, risk appetite, motor impulsiveness, medical students, sex differences, compensatory hypothesis, mediating effect, gaming time
MeSH terms
Internet Addiction Disorder, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Students, Medical, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review