Cited by 9Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The effect of a very brief smoking-reduction intervention in smokers who have no intention to quit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Wu, Lei, He, Yao, Jiang, Bin, Zhang, Di, Tian, Hui, Zuo, Fang, Lam, Tai Hing, Cheung, Yee Tak Derek·2015·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is one of the most common preventable causes of death, but more than half of the Chinese men still use tobacco products. Moreover, 63.6% of Chinese smokers have stated that they would not consider quitting. Specialized and intensive smoking-cessation services are too expensive and passive to have major clinical and public health impacts in developing countries like China. Smoking cessation medications are not covered by medical insurance, and their high price prevents Chinese smokers from using them. Brief interventions are needed to provide cost-effective and timesaving tobacco dependence treatments in China mainland. METHODS/DESIGN: We describe a two-arm randomized controlled trial for smokers who have no intention to quit. The project will be conducted in outpatient clinics at a large hospital in Beijing, China. Both arms include one face-to-face interview plus five follow-up interventions. Each intervention will last approximately one minute. Subjects allocated to the smoking-reduction intervention arm (SRI) will be advised to reduce smoking consumption to at least half of their current consumption level within the next month. All subjects in the SRI will be warned to bear in mind that an attempt to reduce smoking is an intermediate step before complete cessation. Smokers who have successfully reduced their smoking consumption will be encouraged to completely cease smoking. Controls are subjects allocated to the exercise- and diet-advice arm (EDA) and will be given advice about healthy diet and physical activity, but the advice will not include smoking cessation or reduction. Data collection will be done at baseline and at each follow-up interview using standardized questionnaires. The primary outcomes include self-reported and biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence and prolonged abstinence rates at 12-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: We expect that an intention to quit in smoking outpatients can be motivated by physicians in the clinic setting. If this very brief smoking-reduction intervention can be demonstrated to have a positive impact on long-term smoking cessation, this strategy has the potential to be a viable and acceptable approach and may be used widely in China and elsewhere. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02370147 (date of registration: 23 th February, 2015).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-015-1749-7

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Lam TH Abdullah AS Chan SS Hedley AJ Hong Kong council on smoking and health Smoking Cessation Health Centre (SCHC) steering group. Adherence to nicotine replacement therapy versus quitting smoking among Chinese smokers: a preliminary investigation Psychopharmacology(Berl) 2005 4 400 408 10.1007/s00213-004-1971-y 15289997 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, L., He, Y., Jiang, B., Zhang, D., Tian, H., Zuo, F., Lam, T. H., & Cheung, Y. T. D.
Affiliations
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
He, Yao
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2015-04-25
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
418-418
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058643688
Cited by
9
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81373080)
  • Shanxi Scholarship Council of China
  • General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
  • Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (81373080)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, tobacco dependence, long-term abstinence, Chinese smokers
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Counseling, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motivation, Outpatients, Tobacco Use Disorder, Program Evaluation, Smoking Cessation, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review