Cited by 220Occupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in secondary industries of 21st century Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Govaerts, Renée, Tassignon, Bruno, Ghillebert, Jo, Serrien, Ben, De Bock, Sander, Ampe, Toon, El Makrini, Ilias, Vanderborght, Bram +2 more·2021·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over the course of the twenty-first century, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are still persisting among blue collar workers. At present, no epidemiological overview exists. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on the epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) within Europe's secondary industries. METHODS: Five databases were screened, yielding 34 studies for the qualitative analysis and 17 for the quantitative analysis. Twelve subgroups of WMSDs were obtained for the meta-analysis by means of predefined inclusion criteria: back (overall), upper back, lower back, neck, shoulder, neck/shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, leg (overall), hip, knee, and ankle/feet. RESULTS: The most prevalent WMSDs were located at the back (overall), shoulder/neck, neck, shoulder, lower back and wrist WMSDs with mean 12-month prevalence values of 60, 54, 51, 50, 47, and 42%, respectively. The food industry was in the majority of subgroups the most prominent researched sector and was frequently associated with high prevalence values of WMSDs. Incidence ratios of upper limb WMSDs ranged between 0.04 and 0.26. Incidence ratios could not be calculated for other anatomical regions due to the lack of sufficient articles. CONCLUSION: WMSDs are still highly present among blue collar workers. Relatively high prevalence values and low incidence ratios indicate a limited onset of WMSDs with however long-term complaints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12891-021-04615-9

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elbow pain and particularly elbow tendinopathies are highly prevalent, accounting for approximately 20% of work-related MSK conditions, with nearly one million new cases each year in the United States.

    “elbow pain (EP) and particularly elbow tendinopathies are highly prevalent, accounting for approximately 20% of work-related MSK conditions [2], with nearly one million new cases each year in the United States (US) [3].”

    From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Results > Prevalence section reports a mean prevalence of 21% for elbow work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the European industries studied. That is the proportion of workers with an elbow disorder, not the proportion of all work-related musculoskeletal conditions accounted for by elbow pain or tendinopathies. The US annual-case estimate is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govaerts, R., Tassignon, B., Ghillebert, J., Serrien, B., De Bock, S., Ampe, T., El Makrini, I., Vanderborght, B., Meeusen, R., & De Pauw, K.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2021-08-31
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
751-751
ISSN
1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198908453
Cited by
220
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
work-related musculoskeletal disorders, prevalence, incidence, secondary industry, blue-collar workers, food industry, back pain, neck pain, shoulder pain, wrist pain, occupational health, Europe
MeSH terms
Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review