Cited by 77Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationCultural Competency in Health Care

Understanding adherence-related beliefs about medicine amongst patients of South Asian origin with diabetes and cardiovascular disease patients: a qualitative synthesis

Open access
Kumar, Kanta, Greenfield, Sheila, Raza, Karim, Gill, Paramjit, Stack, Rebecca·2016·BMC Endocrine Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) disease amongst UK South Asians is higher than in the general population. Non-adherence to medicines may lead to poor clinical outcomes for South Asian patients with diabetes and CVD. To understand the decision making processes associated with taking medicines, a qualitative systematic meta-synthesis exploring medicine taking behaviours, and beliefs was undertaken. METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index and CINAHL) were searched to identify qualitative studies of South Asian patients taking diabetic medicines. Data were thematic coded and synthesised. RESULTS: The following themes were identified: [1] beliefs about the need for and efficacy of medicines; [2] toxicity of medicines and polypharmacy; [3] the necessity of traditional remedies versus "western medicines"; [4] stigma and social support; and [5] communication. CONCLUSIONS: South Asians described cultural social stigma associated with diabetes and reported fears about drug toxicity as barriers to taking medicines. Cultural beliefs about traditional remedies and interactions with healthcare professionals also appeared to play a role in the way people made decisions about medicines. Advice should be tailored provided to South Asian patients highlighting the long term consequences of diabetes and CVD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12902-016-0103-0

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review by Marshall et al. in 16 countries revealed that lack of awareness of the causes and symptoms of hypertension, fear of drug side effects, and dependency are major causes of treatment discontinuation and lack of adherence.

    “A systematic review by Marshall et al. in 16 countries revealed that the lack of awareness of the causes and symptoms of hypertension, fear of the drugs’ side effects, and their dependency are the major causes of treatment discontinuation and lack of adherence to treatment [35, 36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 6th edition. https://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/atlas-poster-2014-EN.pdf [Accessed 07 Jan 2016].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, K., Greenfield, S., Raza, K., Gill, P., & Stack, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Gill, Paramjit
Venue
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Published
2016-05-26
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
1472-6823 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2342816966
Cited by
77
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Endocrine Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (GB) (RGKP15291)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
medication adherence, medication beliefs, South Asian patients, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, polypharmacy, traditional remedies, stigma, social support, patient-provider communication, cultural beliefs, patient decision-making
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, United Kingdom, Humans, Medicine, Traditional, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Social Support, Asian People, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review