Cited by 21Dental Health and Care Utilizationdental development and anomaliesDental Erosion and Treatment

Silver diamine fluoride with sodium fluoride varnish versus silver diamine fluoride in arresting early childhood caries: a 6-months follow up of a randomized field trial

Open access
Abdellatif, Enas B., El Kashlan, Mona K., El Tantawi, Maha·2023·BMC Oral Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Early childhood caries (ECC) is the most prevalent chronic health problem in young children, and it can be arrested using professionally applied fluoride such as Sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish and Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF). This trial compared two interventions to arrest ECC lesions: 38% SDF combined with 5% NaF varnish versus 38% SDF and assessed whether the arrest rate was affected by baseline lesion severity measured by ICDAS. Methods: Children aged ≤ 4 years from 4 nurseries in a rural area in Alexandria, Egypt joined the study in March 2022. They were included if they had at least one active carious lesion with ICDAS codes ≥ 3. They were randomized to receive either 38% SDF with 5% NaF varnish or 38% SDF alone. In both groups, the agents were applied at baseline and after 6 months on the caries lesions. NaF was additionally applied on all teeth in the oral cavity, and it was also applied after three months. The primary outcome was lesion arrest status after six months. Parents’ satisfaction with their children’s appearance was the secondary outcome. Pearson Chi-Square test was used for bivariate comparison and multi-level multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of the intervention on caries arrest controlling for confounders. The interaction between the intervention and baseline lesion severity (categorized into moderate and severe lesions) was assessed and the p value was calculated. Results: The study included 1606 lesions in 220 children, median (IQR) age = 48(9) months. The percentages of arrested lesions after the application of SDF + NaF and SDF only were 77.7% and 73.2% (p = 0.035). In multivariable analysis, SDF + NaF had significantly greater caries arrest effect than SDF alone (AOR = 2.12, p = 0.03) with significant difference (p = 0.03) between moderate (AOR = 4.10, p = 0.005) and advanced (AOR = 1.92, p = 0.08) lesions. Most parents were satisfied with their children’s appearance with no significant difference between groups (SDF + NaF = 84.5%, SDF = 78.18%, p = 0.23). Conclusion: SDF + NaF had a higher arrest rate than SDF alone and this difference was significant in moderate but not advanced lesions. The findings have implications for the non-invasive management of ECC. Trial registration: This trial was registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry (#NCT05642494).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12903-023-03597-5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large trials in other settings have examined SDF regimens and comparisons, including kindergarten-based contexts, showing that regimen effects exist but are intertwined with staining, acceptability, oral health-related quality of life, and setting-specific realities.

    “Large trials in other settings have examined SDF regimens and comparisons, including kindergarten-based contexts, showing that regimen effects exist but are intertwined with staining, acceptability, oral health-related quality of life, and setting-specific realities [13,15,16,17,18].”

    From Equity or Two-Tier Care? Guardrails for Silver Diamine Fluoride and Delegated Early Childhood Caries Pathways (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdellatif, E. B., El Kashlan, M. K., & El Tantawi, M.
Affiliations
Alexandria University (EG)
Corresponding author
Abdellatif, Enas B.
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2023-11-17
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
875-875
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388758703
Cited by
21
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Alexandria University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental Erosion and Treatment
Keywords
early childhood caries, silver diamine fluoride, sodium fluoride varnish, caries arrest, topical fluoride, parental satisfaction, preschool children, dental caries prevention
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Cariostatic Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Susceptibility, Fluorides, Topical, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sodium, Sodium Fluoride, Silver Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review