Cited by 19Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative and Oncologic Care

Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia: Family carers perspective

Open access
Kupeli, Nuriye, Sampson, Elizabeth L., Leavey, Gerard, Harrington, Jane, Davis, Sarah, Candy, Bridget, King, Michael, Nazareth, Irwin +2 more·2019·BMC Palliative Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Keeping people living with advanced dementia in their usual place of residence is becoming a key governmental goal but to achieve this, family carers and health care professionals must negotiate how to provide optimal care. Previously, we reported a realist analysis of the health care professional perspective. Here, we report on family carer perspectives. We aimed to understand the similarities and differences between the two perspectives, gain insights into how the interdependent roles of family carers and HCPs can be optimised, and make recommendations for policy and practice. METHOD: Qualitative study using a realist approach in which we used the criteria from guidance on optimal palliative care in advanced dementia to examine key contexts, mechanisms and outcomes highlighted by family carers. RESULTS: The themes and views of family caregivers resonate with those of health care professionals. Their overlapping anxieties related to business-driven care homes, uncertainty of families when making EOL decisions and the importance of symptom management referring to contexts, mechanisms and outcomes, respectively. Contexts specific to family carers were ad hoc information about services, dementia progression and access to funding. Not all family carers identified dementia as terminal, but many recognised the importance of continuity of care and knowing the wishes of the person with dementia. New mechanisms included specific resources for improving EOL care and barriers to discussing and planning for future care. Family carers identified the importance of comfort, being present, the meeting of basic care needs and feeling the right decisions have been made as good outcomes of care. CONCLUSIONS: Family carers and health care professionals share similar concerns about the challenges to good EOL dementia care. Better understanding of the effects of dementia at the advanced stages would improve confidence in EOL care and reduce uncertainty in decision making for family carers and health care professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12904-019-0467-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific information gaps were noted around options for long-term care, day-care centers, palliative and hospice services, and in-home support.

    “Specific information gaps were noted around options for long-term care, day-care centers, palliative and hospice services, and in-home support (Armstrong et al., 2020; Fitzpatrick & Grace, 2019; Kupeli et al., 2019; Larsen et al., 2020; Radcliffe et al., 2023; Rognstad et al., 2020).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Kupeli et al., 2019

    The Discussion (Additional themes identified by family carers; page unavailable) reports poorly organised information about service costs and access, and the Results (Context of care; page unavailable) describe difficulties accessing services and care-home admission. The paper does not identify information gaps specifically about day-care centres, palliative or hospice services, or in-home support. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Advance Care Planning (ACP) tools, including Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment and Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) forms, helped clarify preferences and reduce uncertainty around treatment and transition decisions.

    “Advance Care Planning (ACP) tools, including Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment and Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) forms, helped clarify preferences and reduce uncertainty around treatment and transition decisions (Hanson et al., 2019; Kupeli et al., 2019).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Kupeli et al., 2019

    The Results (Outcomes defining good EOL dementia care; Mechanisms generating outcomes) describe advance plans and DNAR forms as helping family carers avoid pressured decisions and express preferences about resuscitation and remaining in the care home. The Discussion (Additional themes identified by family carers) links advance planning to reassurance about decisions. Our copy does not mention Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment, and it attributes preparedness partly to conversations and relationships rather than showing that forms alone reduced uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers 2018 [cited 2019 16th August]; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng97. 30011160
  2. [32]Pawson R Tilley N Realistic Evaluation 1997 London Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kupeli, N., Sampson, E. L., Leavey, G., Harrington, J., Davis, S., Candy, B., King, M., Nazareth, I., Jones, L., & Moore, K.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Kupeli, Nuriye
Venue
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2019-10-24
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
87-87
ISSN
1472-684X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981502767
Cited by
19
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Palliative Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Marie Curie (MCCC-FPR-11-U)
  • Alzheimer's Society (399 AS-JF-17b-016, 325 AS-SF-16-004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
end-of-life care, advanced dementia, family caregivers, healthcare workers, palliative care, symptom management, advance care planning, continuity of care, care homes, decision-making, caregiver uncertainty
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Uncertainty, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review