Cited by 2Ethics in medical practiceInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The effects of e-learning using educational multimedia on the ethical decision-making and professionalism of nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quasi-experimental study

Open access
Tavani, Fatemeh Molaei, Behshid, Mozhgan, Amini, Abolghasem, Rahmani, Azad, Rahmani, Parvin, Mousavi, Saeid·2024·BMC Medical Education

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a great challenge for educational systems worldwide. During this time, educational centers have been encouraged to use e-learning programs to protect the population against infection. Online teaching has the greatest effect on the process of teaching-learning for certain topics, including professional behavior and commitment, which has prompted educational systems to use creative strategies for a greater effect on learners. The present study aims to determine the effects of e-learning using educational multimedia on the ethical decision-making and professionalism of nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study was conducted using a quasi-experimental design with a control group. The statistical population comprised second-semester nursing students in a first-rank nursing school in north western Iran. The samples were selected using simple random sampling and were divided into experimental (n = 40) and control (n = 40) groups. In the first stage of teaching, the conventional training method of the COVID-19 pandemic was used in both groups. In the second stage of teaching, an in-person workshop was organized for the control group and an e-learning workshop using educational multimedia for the experimental group. Data were collected by a tool with three parts: Demographic information, the Nursing Dilemma Test (NDT) by Crisham based on the Nurse Principled Thinking, and the Nursing Students Professional Behaviors Scale (NSPBS) designed by Goz. Data were analyzed in SPSS 25 software. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the post-test mean score of professionalism (125.70 ± 6.20 vs. 120.95 ± 9.28) and ethical decision-making (46.17 ± 3.81 vs. 44.02 ± 3.21) in the experimental group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The learning environment affects learning, and e-learning using educational multimedia has a greater impact than in-person workshops on improved learning outcomes with regard to ethical decision-making and professionalism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-024-05846-9

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The long-term stability of teaching outcomes and the efficiency of translating knowledge comprehension into clinical decision-making capabilities remain critical challenges to be addressed in nursing ethics education.

    “These studies indicate that the long-term stability of teaching outcomes and the efficiency of translating knowledge comprehension into clinical decision-making capabilities remain critical challenges to be addressed [11–21].”

    From Exploring the integration of AI and national quality courses in China: a study on teaching practices in nursing smart education (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction (page not available) describes gaps in nursing students’ ethical knowledge and skills and the need to develop clinical reasoning and ethical decision-making. That supports a broad concern about preparing students for clinical decisions. The study measured outcomes only two weeks after training, and its Strengths and limitations section notes that participants lacked clinical experience; it does not establish that long-term stability or the efficiency of translating knowledge into clinical decisions remains a critical challenge. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [5]Byyny RLJP. Medical professionalism in the modern era. Pharos. 2018;81:2–11.
  2. [18]Khalili A, Davodi M, Pouladi S, Paymard A, Shayan A, Azodi P, et al. Comparative study on the effect of professional ethics education using two methods, group discussion and multi-media software on the knowledge of nursing students. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2016;7(4):2776–81.
  3. [22]Javanmard GH, Abiri FJN. Comparison between Explicit Memory (Recognition and recall memory) of bulimic women and normal women. Neuropsychology. 2016;2(4):75–90.
  4. [24]Gholamhosseini L, Hanafiye Moghadas M, Vandaee O. Value and Status of Professional Morality in the providing nursing services. Review. Paramedical Sci Military Health. 2015;10(1):55–62. Accessed 2015. http://jps.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-47-en.html.
  5. [28]Konwar IHJIJoIS. Education. A study on attitude of college students towards e-learning with special reference to North Lakhimpur of Lakhimpur district. Assam. 2017;4(1):1–9.
  6. [29]Elfaki NK, Abdulraheem I, Abdulrahim RJIJMR, Sciences H. Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on student’s performance and attitude. Int Med J. 2019;24(03):225–33.
  7. [31]Chao S-Y, Chang Y-C, Yang S, Clark M. Development, implementation, and effects of an integrated web-based teaching model in a nursing ethics course. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;55:31–7. 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.011. 28511085 · DOI
  8. [35]Zirak M, Moghaddsiyan S, Abdollahzadeh F, Rahmani A. Moral development of nursing students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Ethics History Med. 2011;4(4):45–55.
  9. [36]Khajavi Z, Vaezzadeh N, Mousavinasab SN, Azimi Lolaty H. Relationship between Ethical Intelligence and Professional Behavior in nurses. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2020;30(185):86–95.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavani, F. M., Behshid, M., Amini, A., Rahmani, A., Rahmani, P., & Mousavi, S.
Affiliations
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Behshid, Mozhgan
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2024-10-29
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1232-1232
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403868842
Cited by
2
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  • University of Tabriz
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
online learning, educational multimedia, ethical decision-making, nursing professionalism, nursing students, COVID-19 pandemic, nursing ethics education
MeSH terms
Professionalism, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Decision Making, Education, Nursing, Female, Humans, Iran, Male, Students, Nursing, Multimedia, Education, Distance, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review