Cited by 14Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Assessing the relationship between nursing process competency and work environment among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional correlational study

Open access
Nemati-Vakilabad, Reza, Kamalifar, Ehsan, Jamshidinia, Mobina, Mirzaei, Alireza·2025·BMC Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The healthcare system is under increasing pressure to improve service quality and patient outcomes, with nurses playing a crucial role. They are responsible for about 80% of healthcare services in hospitals, and their proficiency directly influences care quality, patient satisfaction, and complication rates. The work environment also significantly impacts nurses' ability to perform these competencies, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of these factors in healthcare delivery. This study aims to assess the relationship between nursing process competency and the work environment among clinical nurses. METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional correlational design involving 321 clinical nurses from five teaching hospitals in Ardabil, Iran. Data were collected from April to June 2024 using the Competency of Nursing Process Questionnaire (CNPQ) and a work environment questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 14, employing descriptive statistics and analytical methods, including Independent sample t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation, to examine relationships between variables. RESULTS: The findings revealed significant relationships between overall competency of nursing process and supportive work conditions, particularly fairness in evaluation (r = 0.388, p < 0.001) and colleague support (r = 0.306, p < 0.001). Hierarchical regression highlighted key predictors, including position (Beta = 0.21, p = 0.03) and fairness and Equality in evaluation (Beta = 0.22, p < 0.001), while implementation of the nursing process negatively impacted competency of nursing process (Beta = -0.56, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings highlighted the importance of a positive work environment in improving nursing process competency. To foster a thriving nursing workforce and enhance patient care outcomes, healthcare institutions should implement systems to acknowledge nurses' contributions and encourage open communication that fosters a sense of belonging and value among staff. Additionally, targeted training programs should be provided to focus on the nursing process and skills enhancement, thereby boosting both confidence and competency. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12912-025-02760-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]Egert A, Lee K, Gill M. Nursing fundamentals. Fundamentals of Nursing Pharmacology-Mohawk College Edition 2023.
  2. [14]Sutaguna INT, Yusuf M, Ardianto R, Wartono P. The effect of competence, work experience, work Environment, and Work Discipline on Employee Performance. Asian J Manage Entrepreneurship Social Sci. 2023;3(01):367–81.
  3. [17]Alfaro-LeFevre R. Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and Clinical Judgment E-Book: critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and Clinical Judgment. E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
  4. [26]Abella JL. Determinants of nurses job satisfaction and quality of Nursing Care among nurses in private hospital setting. J Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2022;10(1):25–33.
  5. [29]Fawaz MA, Hamdan-Mansour AM, Tassi A. Challenges facing nursing education in the advanced healthcare environment. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2018;9:105–10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nemati-Vakilabad, R., Kamalifar, E., Jamshidinia, M., & Mirzaei, A.
Affiliations
  • Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Kamalifar, Ehsan
  • Jamshidinia, Mobina
  • Mirzaei, Alireza
Venue
BMC Nursing
Published
2025-02-05
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
134-134
ISSN
1472-6955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407157157
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
  • Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
work environment, clinical nurses, assessment fairness, coworker support, nursing process implementation, nursing workforce, teaching hospitals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review