Cited by 3Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Context matters when implementing patient centred rehabilitation models for persons with cognitive impairment: a case study

Open access
McGilton, Katherine S., Cumal, Alexia, Corsi, Dana, Gingrich, Shaen, Zheng, Nancy, Escrig-Pinol, Astrid·2021·BMC Health Services Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: There is a growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) that require inpatient rehabilitation, and as such patient centred rehabilitation models have been developed. However, implementing evidence-based models without attending to the fit of the model to the new context could lead to an unsuccessful outcome. Researchers collaborated with administrators and staff in one rural site to adapt a patient centred rehabilitation model of care in the Canadian province of Ontario. This paper reports on the contextual factors that influenced the implementation of the model of care. Methods: The study takes a case study approach. One rural facility was purposefully selected for its interest in offering rehabilitation to persons with CI. Four focus group discussions were conducted to explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions on the contextual factors that could affect the implementation of the rehabilitation model of care in the facility. Twenty-seven professionals with various backgrounds were purposively sampled using a maximum diversity sampling strategy. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach was used to analyze the data using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework. Results: Across the domains of the CICI framework, three domains (political, epidemiological, and geographical) and seven corresponding sub-domains of the context were found to have a major influence on the implementation process. Key elements within the political domain included effective teamwork, facilitation, adequate resources, effective communication strategies, and a vision for change. Within the epidemiological domain, a key element was knowing how to tailor rehabilitation approaches for persons with CI. Infrastructure, an aspect of the geographical domain, focused on the facility’s physical layout that required attention. Conclusions: The CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key factors within the context that existed and were required to fully support the implementation of the model of care in a new environment. The findings suggest that when implementing a new program of care, strong consideration should be paid to the political, epidemiological, and geographical domains of the context and how they interact and influence one another.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-021-06206-9

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]du Plessis V B.R Bollman RD Clemenson H Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin 3(3). Cat. No. 21–006-XIE2001003 2001 Ottawa Statistics Canada
  2. [26]Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. xii). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994.
  3. [33]Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGilton, K. S., Cumal, A., Corsi, D., Gingrich, S., Zheng, N., & Escrig-Pinol, A.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Health Sciences North (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
McGilton, Katherine S.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2021-03-06
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
204-204
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135838220
Cited by
3
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (410011045)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
patient-centered rehabilitation, cognitive impairment, implementation context, inpatient rehabilitation, older adults, healthcare professional perceptions, teamwork, infrastructure
MeSH terms
Aged, Health Personnel, Humans, Ontario, Rehabilitation Centers, Focus Groups, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review