Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators

Open access
Krishnamurthy, Nithya, Grimshaw, Alyssa A., Axson, Sydney A., Choe, Sung Hee, Miller, Jennifer E.·2022·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: Repurposing is a drug development strategy receiving heightened attention after the Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization of several repurposed drugs to treat Covid-19. There remain knowledge gaps on the root causes, facilitators and barriers for repurposing. Method: This systematic review used controlled vocabulary and free text terms to search ABI/Informa, Academic Search Premier, Business Source Complete, Cochrane Library, EconLit, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases for the characteristics, reasons and example of companies deprioritizing development of promising drugs and barriers, facilitators and examples of successful re-purposing. Results: We identified 11,814 articles, screened 5,976 for relevance, found 437 eligible for full text review, 115 of which were included in full analysis. Most articles (66%, 76/115) discussed why promising drugs are abandoned, with lack of efficacy or superiority to other therapies ( n = 59), strategic business reasons ( n = 35), safety problems ( n = 28), research design decisions ( n = 12), the complex nature of a studied disease or drug ( n = 7) and regulatory bodies requiring more information ( n = 2) among top reasons. Key barriers to repurposing include inadequate resources ( n = 42), trial data access and transparency around abandoned compounds ( n = 20) and expertise ( n = 11). Additional barriers include uncertainty about the value of repurposing ( n = 13), liability risks ( n = 5) and intellectual property (IP) challenges ( n = 26). Facilitators include the ability to form multi-partner collaborations ( n = 38), access to compound databases and database screening tools ( n = 32), regulatory modifications ( n = 5) and tax incentives ( n = 2). Conclusion: Promising drugs are commonly shelved due to insufficient efficacy or superiority to alternate therapies, poor market prospects, and industry consolidation. Inadequate resources and data access and challenges negotiating IP are key barriers to repurposing reaching its full potential as a core approach in drug development. Multi-partner collaborations and the availability and use of compound databases and tax incentives are key facilitators for repurposing. More research is needed on the current value of repurposing in drug development and how to better facilitate resources to support it, where valuable, especially financial, staffing for out-licensing shelved products, and legal expertise to negotiate IP agreements in multi-partner collaborations. Trial registration: The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/f634k/ ) as it was not eligible for registration on PROSPERO as the review did not focus on a health-related outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-022-08272-z

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Krishnamurthy, N., Grimshaw, A. A., Axson, S. A., Choe, S. H., & Miller, J. E.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2022-07-29
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
970-970
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288707390
Cited by
279
References
67
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-022-08272-z
The paper
Krishnamurthy, N., Grimshaw, A. A., Axson, S. A., Choe, S. H., & Miller, J. E. (2022). Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08272-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.