The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators
Open accessAbstract
Background: Repurposing is a drug development strategy receiving heightened attention after the Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization of several repurposed drugs to treat Covid-19. There remain knowledge gaps on the root causes, facilitators and barriers for repurposing. Method: This systematic review used controlled vocabulary and free text terms to search ABI/Informa, Academic Search Premier, Business Source Complete, Cochrane Library, EconLit, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases for the characteristics, reasons and example of companies deprioritizing development of promising drugs and barriers, facilitators and examples of successful re-purposing. Results: We identified 11,814 articles, screened 5,976 for relevance, found 437 eligible for full text review, 115 of which were included in full analysis. Most articles (66%, 76/115) discussed why promising drugs are abandoned, with lack of efficacy or superiority to other therapies ( n = 59), strategic business reasons ( n = 35), safety problems ( n = 28), research design decisions ( n = 12), the complex nature of a studied disease or drug ( n = 7) and regulatory bodies requiring more information ( n = 2) among top reasons. Key barriers to repurposing include inadequate resources ( n = 42), trial data access and transparency around abandoned compounds ( n = 20) and expertise ( n = 11). Additional barriers include uncertainty about the value of repurposing ( n = 13), liability risks ( n = 5) and intellectual property (IP) challenges ( n = 26). Facilitators include the ability to form multi-partner collaborations ( n = 38), access to compound databases and database screening tools ( n = 32), regulatory modifications ( n = 5) and tax incentives ( n = 2). Conclusion: Promising drugs are commonly shelved due to insufficient efficacy or superiority to alternate therapies, poor market prospects, and industry consolidation. Inadequate resources and data access and challenges negotiating IP are key barriers to repurposing reaching its full potential as a core approach in drug development. Multi-partner collaborations and the availability and use of compound databases and tax incentives are key facilitators for repurposing. More research is needed on the current value of repurposing in drug development and how to better facilitate resources to support it, where valuable, especially financial, staffing for out-licensing shelved products, and legal expertise to negotiate IP agreements in multi-partner collaborations. Trial registration: The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/f634k/ ) as it was not eligible for registration on PROSPERO as the review did not focus on a health-related outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations
Pushpakom, S., Iorio, F., Eyers, P. A., Escott, K. J., Hopper, S., Wells, A., Doig, A., Guilliams, T., Latimer, J., McNamee, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.168 · Cited by 4,718
Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs
Ashburn, T. T., & Thor, K. B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1468 · Cited by 3,237
Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications
Hauser, A. S., Attwood, M. M., Rask-Andersen, M., Schiöth, H. B., & Gloriam, D. E. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.178 · Cited by 2,627
Can you teach old drugs new tricks?
Nosengo, N. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/534314a · Cited by 729
Mehta, D., Jackson, R., Paul, G., Shi, J., & Sabbagh, M. (2017) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1080/13543784.2017.1323868 · Cited by 607
Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results
Hwang, T. J., Carpenter, D., Lauffenburger, J. C., Wang, B., Franklin, J. M., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6008 · Cited by 442
Drug repurposing from the perspective of pharmaceutical companies
Cha, Y., Erez, T., Reynolds, I. J., Kumar, D., Ross, J., Koytiger, G., Kusko, R., Zeskind, B., Risso, S., Kagan, E., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13798 · Cited by 429
Jin, G., & Wong, S. T. C. (2014) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.11.005 · Cited by 416
Use of genome-wide association studies for drug repositioning
Sanseau, P., Agarwal, P., Barnes, M. R., Pastinen, T., Richards, J. B., Cardon, L. R., & Mooser, V. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2151 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2023
Cummings, J., Zhou, Y., Lee, G., Zhong, K., Fonseca, J., & Cheng, F. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.12385 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnamurthy, N., Grimshaw, A. A., Axson, S. A., Choe, S. H., & Miller, J. E.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2022-07-29
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 970-970
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4288707390
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-022-08272-z
- The paper
- Krishnamurthy, N., Grimshaw, A. A., Axson, S. A., Choe, S. H., & Miller, J. E. (2022). Drug repurposing: a systematic review on root causes, barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08272-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.