Cited by 176Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGut microbiota and health

Multiple levels of the unknown in microbiome research

Open access
Thomas, Andrew Maltez, Segata, Nicola·2019·BMC Biology

Abstract

Metagenomics allows exploration of aspects of a microbial community that were inaccessible by cultivation-based approaches targeting single microbes. Many new microbial taxa and genes have been discovered using metagenomics, but different kinds of "unknowns" still remain in a microbiome experiment. We discuss here whether and how it is possible to deal with them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12915-019-0667-z

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, A. M., & Segata, N.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Segata, Nicola
Venue
BMC Biology
Published
2019-06-12
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
48-48
ISSN
1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950447040
Cited by
176
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (H2020, RBFR13EWWI_001)
  • LEO Pharma
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (MASTER-818368, OncoBiome 825410, 818368, ONCOBIOME-825410 project, MASTER-818368 project, 825410)
  • H2020 European Research Council (716575)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
microbiome research, metagenomics, microbial communities, unculturable microorganisms, unknown genes, microbial diversity, experimental design
MeSH terms
Archaea, Bacteria, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review