Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families

Open access
Li, Hong-Tao, Luo, Yang, Gan, Lu, Ma, Peng-Fei, Gao, Lian-Ming, Yang, Jun-Bo, Cai, Jie, Gitzendanner, Matthew A., Fritsch, Peter W., Zhang, Ting, Jin, Jian-Jun, Zeng, Chun-Xia, Wang, Hong, Yu, Wen-Bin, Zhang, Rong, van der Bank, Michelle, Olmstead, Richard G., Hollingsworth, Peter M., Chase, Mark W., Soltis, Douglas E., Soltis, Pamela S., Yi, Ting-Shuang, Li, De-Zhu·2021·BMC Biology

Abstract

Background: Flowering plants (angiosperms) are dominant components of global terrestrial ecosystems, but phylogenetic relationships at the familial level and above remain only partially resolved, greatly impeding our full understanding of their evolution and early diversification. The plastome, typically mapped as a circular genome, has been the most important molecular data source for plant phylogeny reconstruction for decades. Results: Here, we assembled by far the largest plastid dataset of angiosperms, composed of 80 genes from 4792 plastomes of 4660 species in 2024 genera representing all currently recognized families. Our phylogenetic tree (PPA II) is essentially congruent with those of previous plastid phylogenomic analyses but generally provides greater clade support. In the PPA II tree, 75% of nodes at or above the ordinal level and 78% at or above the familial level were resolved with high bootstrap support (BP ≥ 90). We obtained strong support for many interordinal and interfamilial relationships that were poorly resolved previously within the core eudicots, such as Dilleniales, Saxifragales, and Vitales being resolved as successive sisters to the remaining rosids, and Santalales, Berberidopsidales, and Caryophyllales as successive sisters to the asterids. However, the placement of magnoliids, although resolved as sister to all other Mesangiospermae, is not well supported and disagrees with topologies inferred from nuclear data. Relationships among the five major clades of Mesangiospermae remain intractable despite increased sampling, probably due to an ancient rapid radiation. Conclusions: We provide the most comprehensive dataset of plastomes to date and a well-resolved phylogenetic tree, which together provide a strong foundation for future evolutionary studies of flowering plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12915-021-01166-2

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Metadata

Authors
Li, H.-T., Luo, Y., Gan, L., Ma, P.-F., Gao, L.-M., Yang, J.-B., Cai, J., Gitzendanner, M. A., Fritsch, P. W., Zhang, T., Jin, J.-J., Zeng, C.-X., Wang, H., Yu, W.-B., Zhang, R., van der Bank, M., Olmstead, R. G., Hollingsworth, P. M., Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Yi, T.-S., & Li, D.-Z.
Venue
BMC Biology
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
232-232
ISSN
1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209782606
Cited by
259
References
98
FWCI
34.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12915-021-01166-2
The paper
Li, H.-T., Luo, Y., Gan, L., Ma, P.-F., Gao, L.-M., Yang, J.-B., Cai, J., Gitzendanner, M. A., Fritsch, P. W., Zhang, T., Jin, J.-J., Zeng, C.-X., Wang, H., Yu, W.-B., Zhang, R., van der Bank, M., Olmstead, R. G., Hollingsworth, P. M., Chase, M. W., . . . Li, D.-Z. (2021). Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families. BMC Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01166-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.