Cited by 76Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Is statin-modified reduction in lipids the most important preventive therapy for cardiovascular disease? A pro/con debate

Open access
Hobbs, FD Richard, Banach, Maciej, Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., Malhotra, Aseem, Capewell, Simon·2016·BMC Medicine

Abstract

The most prescribed medications in the world are statins, lipid modifiers that have been available for over 25 years and amongst the most investigated of all drug classes. With over a million patient years of trial data and publications in the most prestigious medical journals, it is remarkable that quite so much debate remains as to their place in healthcare. They have had a bittersweet passage, with vocal concerns over their possible risks, from suicide to cancer, and allegations that they do not work in women or the elderly, to statements that the whole published dataset, on over 200,000 patients consenting to enter trials, was fatally compromised by being industry-funded by and large. On the other side, there have been billions of dollars spent on generating their evidence base followed by promotion which has returned that investment many times over in profits, and a powerful scientific lobby that argue they are wonder drugs and that continued nihilism on their value risks patient lives. So who is right?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-016-0550-5

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobbs, F. R., Banach, M., Mikhailidis, D. P., Malhotra, A., & Capewell, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • Frimley Park Hospital (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2016-01-14
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2238207260
Cited by
76
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10273)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
statins, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular disease prevention, statin safety, statin efficacy, pharmaceutical marketing, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Lipids, Male, Neoplasms, Suicide, Attempted, Down-Regulation, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Lipid Metabolism, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review