Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

Open access
Aune, Dagfinn, Keum, NaNa, Giovannucci, Edward, Fadnes, Lars T., Boffetta, Paolo, Greenwood, Darren C., Tonstad, Serena, Vatten, Lars J., Riboli, Elio, Norat, Teresa·2016·BMC Medicine

Abstract

Although nut consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, data on less common causes of death has not been systematically assessed. Previous reviews missed several studies and additional studies have since been published. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. PubMed and Embase were searched for prospective studies of nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adult populations published up to July 19, 2016. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. The burden of mortality attributable to low nut consumption was calculated for selected regions. Twenty studies (29 publications) were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RRs per 28 grams/day increase in nut intake was for coronary heart disease, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63–0.80, I 2 = 47%, n = 11), stroke, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83–1.05, I 2 = 14%, n = 11), cardiovascular disease, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70–0.88, I 2 = 60%, n = 12), total cancer, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76–0.94, I 2 = 42%, n = 8), all-cause mortality, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84, I 2 = 66%, n = 15), and for mortality from respiratory disease, 0.48 (95% CI: 0.26–0.89, I 2 = 61%, n = 3), diabetes, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43–0.88, I 2 = 0%, n = 4), neurodegenerative disease, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.40–1.08, I 2 = 5.9%, n = 3), infectious disease, 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07–0.85, I 2 = 54%, n = 2), and kidney disease, 0.27 (95% CI: 0.04–1.91, I 2 = 61%, n = 2). The results were similar for tree nuts and peanuts. If the associations are causal, an estimated 4.4 million premature deaths in the America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific would be attributable to a nut intake below 20 grams per day in 2013. Higher nut intake is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality, and mortality from respiratory disease, diabetes, and infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, Chung HR, Kim J. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle consumers and non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract. 2011;5:443–9. · doi:10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.443

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Aune, D., Keum, N., Giovannucci, E., Fadnes, L. T., Boffetta, P., Greenwood, D. C., Tonstad, S., Vatten, L. J., Riboli, E., & Norat, T.
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2016-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
207-207
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557707278
Cited by
401
References
89
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Olav og Gerd Meidel Raagholt’s Stiftelse for Medisinsk forskning
  • the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
  • Imperial College National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3
The paper
Aune, D., Keum, N., Giovannucci, E., Fadnes, L. T., Boffetta, P., Greenwood, D. C., Tonstad, S., Vatten, L. J., Riboli, E., & Norat, T. (2016). Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.