Cited by 18Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesVector-borne infectious diseasesBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment

Associations between clinical canine leishmaniosis and multiple vector-borne co-infections: a case-control serological study

Open access
Attipa, Charalampos, Solano-Gallego, Laia, Leutenegger, Christian M., Papasouliotis, Kostas, Soutter, Francesca, Balzer, Jörg, Carver, Scott, Buch, Jesse S. +1 more·2019·BMC Veterinary Research

Abstract

Background: Dogs that have clinical leishmaniosis (ClinL), caused by the parasite Leishmania infantum , are commonly co-infected with other pathogens, especially vector-borne pathogens (VBP). A recent PCR-based study found that ClinL dogs are more likely to be additionally infected with the rickettsial bacteria Ehrlichia canis . Further information on co-infections in ClinL cases with VBP, as assessed by serology, is required. The research described in this report determined if dogs with ClinL are at higher risk of exposure to VBP than healthy control dogs using a case-control serology study. Results: Of the 47 dogs with ClinL, anti- E. canis / Ehrlichia ewingii antibodies were detected in 17 (36.2%), anti- Anaplasma phagocytophilum / Anaplasma platys antibodies in 5 (10.6%) and antigen for Dirofilaria immitis in 2 (4.3%). Of the 87 control dogs, anti- E. canis / E . ewingii antibodies were detected in 14 (16.1%) and anti- A . phagocytophilum / A . platys antibodies in 2 (2.3%). No anti- Borrelia burgdorferi antibody tests were positive. No statistical differences between the ClinL dogs and control dogs regarding lifestyle or use of ectoparasitic prevention, were identified. The ClinL was significantly associated with anti- E. canis / E . ewingii antibodies (odds ratio = 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.3–6.7, P = 0.010) compared to controls by both multivariable logistic regression and structural equation modelling. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that an increased risk for E. canis / E . ewingii seropositivity is present in dogs with ClinL compared to clinically healthy control dogs, despite similar ectoparasitic prevention use and lifestyle. Based on these findings it is suggested that dogs with ClinL should not only be tested for E. canis co-infection using PCR but also serologically for E. canis / E . ewingii .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12917-019-2083-6

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Czech Republic was considered endemic 10 years ago, but in the last decade there has been no increase in reported cases and only one study has been published in a dog co-infected with D. repens in Příbram, an imported case from Hungary.

    “The Czech Republic was considered endemic 10 years ago, with reports of autochthonous cases and infected dogs coming from neighbouring endemic countries [2,9]. However, in the last decade, there has been no increase in the number of reported cases and only one study has been published in a dog co-infected with D. repens in Příbram, in the Central Bohemian region, being an imported case of Hungary”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attipa, C., Solano-Gallego, L., Leutenegger, C. M., Papasouliotis, K., Soutter, F., Balzer, J., Carver, S., Buch, J. S., & Tasker, S.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • IDEXX Laboratories (United States) (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • IDEXX Laboratories (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Attipa, Charalampos
Venue
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2019-09-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
331-331
ISSN
1746-6148 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973903104
Cited by
18
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Veterinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203919/Z/16/Z)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/1015655/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Keywords
canine leishmaniasis, Leishmania infantum, Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, seroprevalence, dogs, zoonotic pathogens
MeSH terms
Anaplasma, Anaplasmosis, Animals, Cyprus, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Ehrlichia, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Leishmaniasis, Male, Case-Control Studies, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Ehrlichiosis, Leishmania infantum, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review