Cited by 76Vector-borne infectious diseasesParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and control

Occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs in France: Results of a countrywide serologic survey

Pantchev, Nikola, Schaper, Roland, Limousin, Sandy, Norden, Nina, Weise, Miriam, Lorentzen, Leif·2009·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis antigen and antibodies against tick-borne pathogens in French dogs has been analysed based on 1,050 blood samples. Serum samples of 919 dogs (group A) were sent for a variety of diagnostic investigations, further 131 dogs (group B) were tested for a tentative diagnosis of heartworm disease. All samples were tested for D. immitis antigen. Samples in group A were also tested for specific antibodies against three tick-borne pathogens (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis). Results were plotted in geographical maps. Occurrence of D. immitis antigen in group A (0.22%; 95 % CI: 0.03-0.78%) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than in group B (6.87%; 95% CI: 3.19-12.64%). Heartworm infections in both groups were regionally restricted to the areas of Bouches-du-Rhône in the South of France and Corsica. In group A, the calculated seroprevalence was 2.72% (95% CI: 1.77-3.99%) for A. phagocytophilum, 1.09% (95% CI: 0.52-1.99%) for B. burgdorferi and 0.33% (95% CI: 0.07-0.95%) for E. canis with a distribution of the positive cases throughout the country. This study represents the first data of A. phagocytophilum seroprevalence in the French dog population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-009-1501-2

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pantchev, N., Schaper, R., Limousin, S., Norden, N., Weise, M., & Lorentzen, L.
Affiliations
  • IDEXX Laboratories (Germany) (DE)
  • Elanco Animal Health (Germany) (DE)
  • Bayer (France) (FR)
  • IDEXX Laboratories (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Pantchev, Nikola
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2009-06-28
Volume
105
Issue
S1
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2088026400
Cited by
76
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, heartworm disease, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Ehrlichia canis, tick-borne diseases, canine seroprevalence, dogs, serological survey, France
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Antigens, Helminth, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, France, Geography, Lyme Disease, Borrelia burgdorferi Group, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Ehrlichiosis, Tick-Borne Diseases, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review