The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The discovery of novel anticancer drugs is critical for the pharmaceutical research and development, and patient treatment. Repurposing existing drugs that may have unanticipated effects as potential candidates is one way to meet this important goal. Systematic investigation of efficient anticancer drugs could provide valuable insights into trends in the discovery of anticancer drugs, which may contribute to the systematic discovery of new anticancer drugs. RESULTS: In this study, we collected and analyzed 150 anticancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on drug mechanism of action, these agents are divided into two groups: 61 cytotoxic-based drugs and 89 target-based drugs. We found that in the recent years, the proportion of targeted agents tended to be increasing, and the targeted drugs tended to be delivered as signal drugs. For 89 target-based drugs, we collected 102 effect-mediating drug targets in the human genome and found that most targets located on the plasma membrane and most of them belonged to the enzyme, especially tyrosine kinase. From above 150 drugs, we built a drug-cancer network, which contained 183 nodes (150 drugs and 33 cancer types) and 248 drug-cancer associations. The network indicated that the cytotoxic drugs tended to be used to treat more cancer types than targeted drugs. From 89 targeted drugs, we built a cancer-drug-target network, which contained 214 nodes (23 cancer types, 89 drugs, and 102 targets) and 313 edges (118 drug-cancer associations and 195 drug-target associations). Starting from the network, we discovered 133 novel drug-cancer associations among 52 drugs and 16 cancer types by applying the common target-based approach. Most novel drug-cancer associations (116, 87%) are supported by at least one clinical trial study. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we provided a comprehensive data source, including anticancer drugs and their targets and performed a detailed analysis in term of historical tendency and networks. Its application to identify novel drug-cancer associations demonstrated that the data collected in this study is promising to serve as a fundamental for anticancer drug repurposing and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types
Kandoth, C., McLellan, M. D., Vandin, F., Ye, K., Niu, B., Lu, C., Xie, M., Zhang, Q., McMichael, J. F., Wyczalkowski, M. A., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12634 · Cited by 4,419
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs
Ashburn, T. T., & Thor, K. B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1468 · Cited by 3,237
A census of human cancer genes
Futreal, P. A., Coin, L., Marshall, M., Down, T., Hubbard, T., Wooster, R., Rahman, N., & Stratton, M. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1299 · Cited by 3,184
DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism
Law, V., Knox, C., Djoumbou, Y., Jewison, T., Guo, A. C., Liu, Y., Maciejewski, A., Arndt, D., Wilson, M., Neveu, V., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1068 · Cited by 1,993
Self-citationDoxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects
Thorn, C. F., Oshiro, C., Marsh, S., Hernandez-Boussard, T., McLeod, H., Klein, T. E., & Altman, R. B. (2011) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0b013e32833ffb56 · Cited by 1,648
Trends in the exploitation of novel drug targets
Rask-Andersen, M., Almén, M. S., & Schiöth, H. B. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3478 · Cited by 853
Davoli, T., Xu, A. W., Mengwasser, K. E., Sack, L. M., Yoon, J. C., Park, P. J., & Elledge, S. J. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.011 · Cited by 815
Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery
Rajendran, L., Knölker, H.-J., & Simons, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2897 · Cited by 708
Cited by
Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy
Gao, W., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, X., & Yu, Y. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01046-3 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationTong, X., Tang, R., Xiao, M., Xu, J., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Liu, J., Yu, X., & Shi, S. (2022) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01392-3 · Cited by 883
Emerging mechanisms and targeted therapy of ferroptosis in cancer
Wang, H., Cheng, Y., Mao, C., Liu, S., Xiao, D., Huang, J., & Tao, Y. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.03.022 · Cited by 312
Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: causative factors and possible interventions
Jones, I. C., & Dass, C. R. (2022) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1093/jpp/rgac063 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, J., Wei, Q., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Q., & Xu, H.
- Venue
- BMC Systems Biology
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- 87-87
- ISSN
- 1752-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2763145619
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12918-017-0464-7
- The paper
- Sun, J., Wei, Q., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Q., & Xu, H. (2017). A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs. BMC Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0464-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.