Cited by 86Reproductive tract infections researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsSurfactants and Colloidal Systems

Biosurfactant from vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus BC1 as a promising agent to interfere with Candida adhesion

Open access
De Gregorio, Priscilla Romina, Parolin, Carola, Abruzzo, Angela, Luppi, Barbara, Protti, Michele, Mercolini, Laura, Silva, Jessica Alejandra, Giordani, Barbara +3 more·2020·Microbial Cell Factories

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lactobacillus spp. dominating the vaginal microbiota of healthy women contribute to the prevention of urogenital and sexually transmitted infections. Their protective role in the vagina can be mediated by Lactobacillus cells themselves, metabolites or bacterial components, able to interfere with pathogen adhesion and infectivity. Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common genital infection, caused by the overgrowth of opportunistic Candida spp. including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei and C. tropicalis. Azole antifungal drugs are not always efficient in resolving VVC and preventing recurrent infections, thus alternative anti-Candida agents based on vaginal probiotics have gained more importance. The present work aims to chemically characterize the biosurfactant (BS) isolated from a vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus strain, L. crispatus BC1, and to investigate its safety and antiadhesive/antimicrobial activity against Candida spp., employing in vitro and in vivo assays. RESULTS: BS isolated from vaginal L. crispatus BC1 was characterised as non-homogeneous lipopeptide molecules with a critical micellar concentration value of 2 mg/mL, and good emulsification and mucoadhesive properties. At 1.25 mg/mL, the BS was not cytotoxic and reduced Candida strains' ability to adhere to human cervical epithelial cells, mainly by exclusion mechanism. Moreover, intravaginal (i.va.) inoculation of BS in a murine experimental model was safe and did not perturb vaginal cytology, histology and cultivable vaginal microbiota. In the case of i.va. challenge of mice with C. albicans, BS was able to reduce leukocyte influx. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that BS from vaginal L. crispatus BC1 is able to interfere with Candida adhesion in vitro and in vivo, and suggest its potential as a preventive agent to reduce mucosal damage occasioned by Candida during VVC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12934-020-01390-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies reported that postbiotics could reduce the adhesion of C. albicans on vaginal epithelial cells by Lactobacillus CFSs, and biosurfactants.

    “Previous studies reported that postbiotics could reduce the adhesion of C. albicans on vaginal epithelial cells by Lactobacillus CFSs, and biosurfactants.13,14,17,18”

    From Aggregation and adhesion ability of various probiotic strains and Candida species: An in vitro study (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results (Anti-adhesive activity of BS against Candida spp.; page unavailable) report that a biosurfactant from L. crispatus BC1 reduced C. albicans adhesion to HeLa cervical epithelial cells. The paper does not establish the claim about Lactobacillus cell-free supernatants, and the tested cells were cervical rather than vaginal epithelial cells. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Gregorio, P. R., Parolin, C., Abruzzo, A., Luppi, B., Protti, M., Mercolini, L., Silva, J. A., Giordani, B., Marangoni, A., Nader-Macías, M. E. F., & Vitali, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Parolin, Carola
Venue
Microbial Cell Factories
Published
2020-06-18
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
133-133
ISSN
1475-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036398975
Cited by
86
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbial Cell Factories (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2017-4324, PICT 2018-00670)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
Keywords
biosurfactants, Lactobacillus crispatus, vaginal microbiota, Candida adhesion, vaginal candidiasis, Candida albicans, lipopeptides, antimicrobial activity, vaginal probiotics, critical micelle concentration, mucoadhesion, emulsification, vaginal administration, leukocyte influx
MeSH terms
Lactobacillus crispatus, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Surface-Active Agents, Vagina, Mice, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review