Cited by 91Malaria Research and ControlSocial Media in Health EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Using WeChat Official Accounts to Improve Malaria Health Literacy among Chinese Expatriates in Niger: An Intervention Study

Open access
Li, Wei, Han, Le Qiang, Guo, Yan Jun, Sun, Jing·2016·Malaria Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria is the main health risk for Chinese expatriates working in Niger. Health education is a recommended intervention for prevention of malaria among non-immune travellers and expatriate workers. It is urgent to develop an effective and feasible way for these populations to obtain information about the prevention and treatment of malaria. METHODS: An individually randomized, unblinded, controlled trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of using WeChat official accounts for health education to improve malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger. A total 1441 participants completed a baseline malaria health literacy questionnaire and were randomly assigned to an intervention or comparison group in a ratio of 1:1. From July to October 2014, 50 malaria prevention and treatment messages were sent to the intervention group; 50 health news messages were concurrently sent to the control group. Both groups completed the malaria health literacy questionnaire again 4 months after the start of the education intervention. A questionnaire addressing satisfaction with the health education programme was completed by the intervention group. Malaria morbidity data for 2013 and 2014 were also collected. RESULTS: At baseline, participant health literacy rates were 58.29, 62, 54, and 34% for skills, knowledge, practice, and attitude, respectively. After the intervention, rates for all four aspects of malaria literacy were above 70%. There was greater change in knowledge, attitude, practice, skills, and overall health literacy among the intervention group compared with the controls, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). This was especially true for acquisition of malaria-related knowledge, practice and attitude; comprehensive intervention practices; and, correct use of rapid diagnostic tests (p < 0.001). The reported malaria morbidity during the study period decreased from 23.72 to 15.40%. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the WeChat health education programme with over 80% stating that they would continue to follow the programme. CONCLUSIONS: The present health education intervention, via a WeChat official account, for the prevention and treatment of malaria among non-immune travellers and expatriate workers proved to be an effective, sustainable, feasible, and well accepted strategy for improving malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12936-016-1621-y

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animation, text or social media promotion, or apps help patients acquire health information more effectively.

    “For example, animation [357,358], text or social media promotion [359,360,361], or apps [362,363] help patients acquire health information more effectively [364].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [359]

    The Results section reports significantly greater gains in malaria-related knowledge acquisition and health literacy among Chinese expatriates receiving WeChat education than among controls. This supports the effectiveness of a social-media app for acquiring health information, but the study does not establish that animation or text promotion generally helps patients acquire information more effectively. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Han, L. Q., Guo, Y. J., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Jing
Venue
Malaria Journal
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
567-567
ISSN
1475-2875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555114478
Cited by
88
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Malaria Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
CNODC (20150101)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
malaria, health literacy, WeChat official accounts, Chinese expatriates, health education, malaria prevention, malaria treatment, expatriate workers, rapid diagnostic tests, mobile health, Niger
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malaria, Male, Middle Aged, Niger, Surveys and Questionnaires, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review