Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?

Wakerman, John, Humphreys, John, Russell, Deborah, Guthridge, Steven, Bourke, Lisa, Dunbar, Terry, Zhao, Yuejen, Ramjan, Mark, Murakami-Gold, Lorna, Jones, Michael P.·2019·Human Resources for Health

Abstract

Background: Residents of remote communities in Australia and other geographically large countries have comparatively poorer access to high-quality primary health care. To inform ongoing policy development and practice in relation to remote area health service delivery, particularly in remote Indigenous communities, this review synthesizes the key findings of (1) a comprehensive study of workforce turnover and retention in remote Northern Territory (NT) of Australia and (2) a narrative review of relevant international literature on remote and rural health workforce retention strategies. This synthesis provides a valuable summary of the current state of international knowledge about improving remote health workforce retention. Main text: Annual turnover rates of NT remote area nurses (148%) and Aboriginal health practitioners (80%) are very high and 12-month stability rates low (48% and 76%, respectively). In remote NT, use of agency nurses has increased substantially. Primary care costs are high and proportional to staff turnover and remoteness. Effectiveness of care decreases with higher turnover and use of short-term staff, such that higher staff turnover is always less cost-effective. If staff turnover in remote clinics were halved, the potential savings would be approximately A$32 million per annum. Staff turnover and retention were affected by management style and effectiveness, and employment of Indigenous staff. Review of the international literature reveals three broad themes: Targeted enrolment into training and appropriate education designed to produce a competent, accessible, acceptable and ‘fit-for-purpose’ workforce; addressing broader health system issues that ensure a safe and supportive work environment ; and providing ongoing individual and family support . Key educational initiatives include prioritising remote origin and Indigenous students for university entry; maximising training in remote areas; contextualising curricula; providing financial, pedagogical and pastoral support; and ensuring clear, supported career pathways and continuing professional development. Health system initiatives include ensuring adequate funding; providing adequate infrastructure including fit-for-purpose clinics, housing, transport and information technology; offering flexible employment arrangements whilst ensuring a good ‘fit’ between individual staff and the community (especially with regard to cultural skills); optimising co-ordination and management of services that empower staff and create positive practice environments; and prioritising community participation and employment of locals. Individual and family supports include offering tailored financial incentives, psychological support and ‘time out’. Conclusion: Optimal remote health workforce stability and preventing excessive ‘avoidable’ turnover mandates alignment of government and health authority policies with both health service requirements and individual health professional and community needs. Supportive underpinning policies include: Strong intersectoral collaboration between the health and education sectors to ensure a fit-for-purpose workforce; A funding policy which mandates the development and implementation of an equitable, needs-based formula for funding remote health services; Policies that facilitate transition to community control, prioritise Indigenous training and employment, and mandate a culturally safe work context; and An employment policy which provides flexibility of employment conditions in order to be able to offer individually customised retention packages There is considerable extant evidence from around the world about effective retention strategies that contribute to slowing excessive remote health workforce turnover, resulting in significant cost savings and improved continuity of care. The immediate problem comprises an ‘implementation gap’ in translating empirical research evidence into actions designed to resolve existing problems. If we wish to ameliorate the very high turnover of staff in remote areas, in order to provide an equitable service to populations with arguably the highest health needs, we need political and executive commitment to get the policy settings right and ensure the coordinated implementation of multiple strategies, including better linking existing strategies and ‘filling the gaps’ where necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12960-019-0432-y

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Total number of unique employees by employment category and time, 2004–2015, Northern Territory
Fig. 1 Total number of unique employees by employment category and time, 2004–2015, Northern TerritoryCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Trends in full-time equivalent agency and NT DOH-employed nurses, 2004–2015, Northern Territory
Fig. 2 Trends in full-time equivalent agency and NT DOH-employed nurses, 2004–2015, Northern TerritoryCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mason J. Review of Australian Government Health Workforce Programs. Australian Government Department of Health: Canberra; 2013.
  2. Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: Northern Territory Emergency Response. Evaluation Report 2011. Canberra: FaHCSIA;2011. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10070/252540
  3. Fleming PM, Sinnot ML. Rural physician supply and retention: factors in the Canadian context. Can J Rural Med. 2018;23:15–20.

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Wakerman, J., Humphreys, J., Russell, D., Guthridge, S., Bourke, L., Dunbar, T., Zhao, Y., Ramjan, M., Murakami-Gold, L., & Jones, M. P.
Venue
Human Resources for Health
Published
2019-12
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
1478-4491
Cited by
182
References
62
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Discovery Project Australian Research Council (DP150102227)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12960-019-0432-y
The paper
Wakerman, J., Humphreys, J., Russell, D., Guthridge, S., Bourke, L., Dunbar, T., Zhao, Y., Ramjan, M., Murakami-Gold, L., & Jones, M. P. (2019). Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities? Human Resources for Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0432-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.