Cited by 49Occupational Health and PerformanceHealth and Conflict StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Erosion of the healthy soldier effect in veterans of US military service in Iraq and Afghanistan

Open access
Bollinger, Mary J, Schmidt, Susanne, Pugh, Jacqueline A, Parsons, Helen M, Copeland, Laurel A, Pugh, Mary Jo·2015·Population Health Metrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This research explores the healthy soldier effect (HSE) - a lower mortality risk among veterans relative to the general population-in United States (US) veterans deployed in support of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (OEF/OIF/OND). While a HSE has been affirmed in other OEF/OIF/OND populations, US veterans of OEF/OIF/OND have not been systematically studied. METHODS: Using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data, we identified veterans who (1) had been deployed in support of OEF/OIF/OND between 2002 and 2011 and (2) were enrolled in the VA health care system. We divided the VA population into VA health care utilizers and non-utilizers. We obtained Department of Defense (DOD) administrative data on the OEF/OIF/OND population and obtained VA and DOD mortality data excluding combat deaths from the analyses. Indirect standardization was used to compare VA and DOD cohorts to the US population using total population at risk to compute the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR). A directly standardized relative risk (DSRR) was calculated to enable comparisons between cohorts. To compare VA enrollee mortality on military specific characteristics, we used a DOD population standard. RESULTS: The overall VA SMR of 2.8 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.8-2.9), VA utilizer SMR of 3.2 (95% CI 3.1-3.3), VA non-utilizer SMR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.8-1.1), and DOD SMR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.5) provide no evidence of a HSE in any cohort relative to the US standard population. Relative to DOD, both the total VA population SMR of 2.1 (95% CI 2.0-2.2) and the SMR for VA utilizers of 2.3 (95% CI 2.3-2.4) indicate mortality twice what would be expected given DOD mortality rates. In contrast, the VA enrollees who had not used clinical services had 40% lower than expected mortality relative to DOD. CONCLUSIONS: No support was found for the HSE among US veterans of OEF/OIF/OND. These findings may be attributable to a number of factors including post-deployment risk-taking behavior, an abbreviated follow up period, and the nature of the OEF/OIF/OND conflict.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12963-015-0040-6

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The physical and psychological stressors of military service erode the healthy soldier effect.

    “However, the physical and psychological stressors of military service have been found to erode this effect.2”

    From Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military veterans: A cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Conclusion (page not provided) reports that the healthy soldier effect had eroded in the studied Iraq and Afghanistan veteran cohorts. It suggests repeated deployments and survival from severe injuries as possible contributors, but does not establish that physical and psychological stressors caused the erosion; the Background mentions psychological conditions without linking them to that finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Reporting System (DRS). Active Duty and Reserve Component Service Members Data. In Book Active Duty and Reserve Component Service Members Data (Editor ed.^eds.). City; 2013.
  2. [19]VA Information Resource Center (VIREC). VIReC Data Investigation: Vital Status File Date of Birth (DOB) and Sex Quality Review. In Book VIReC Data Investigation: Vital Status File Date of Birth (DOB) and Sex Quality Review (Editor ed.^eds.). City; 2011.
  3. [27]Department of Veterans Affairs VHA, Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for health for Policy and Planning. 2013 VA Enrollee Health Care Projection Model, Base Year 2012. In Book 2013 VA Enrollee Health Care Projection Model, Base Year 2012 (Editor ed.^eds.). City; 2013.
  4. [33]Inskeep S Bowman T Army Documents Show Lower Recruiting Standards Book Army Documents Show Lower Recruiting Standards (Editor ed.^eds.) 2008 City National Public Radio
  5. [34]Unknown. Lower standards help Army meet recruiting goal. In Book Lower standards help Army meet recruiting goal (Editor ed.^eds.). City: Gannett Co. Inc.; 2006.
  6. [35]Singer M. Military Lowers Standards to Fill Ranks. In Book Military Lowers Standards to Fill Ranks (Editor ed.^eds.). City; 2007.
  7. [36]Congressional Budget Office The all-volunteer military: issues and performance Book The all-volunteer military: issues and performance (Editor ed.^eds.) 2007 City Congress of the United States

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bollinger, M. J., Schmidt, S., Pugh, J. A., Parsons, H. M., Copeland, L. A., & Pugh, M. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Bollinger, Mary J
Venue
Population Health Metrics
Published
2015-03-18
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1478-7954 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105697361
Cited by
49
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population Health Metrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (DHI-09-237)
  • Office of Research and Development
  • Health Services Research and Development (DHI 09-237)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
military veterans, mortality, Operation Enduring Freedom, Iraq War, Operation New Dawn, standardized mortality ratio, health care access, veterans' health, Iraq and Afghanistan deployment, Department of Veterans Affairs, indirect standardization, direct standardization, relative risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review