The tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 increases robustness and information transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity is an inherent feature of multicellular organisms and is central in all physiological and pathophysiological processes including cellular signal transduction. The cytokine IL-6 is an essential mediator of pro- and anti-inflammatory processes. Dysregulated IL-6-induced intracellular JAK/STAT signalling is associated with severe inflammatory and proliferative diseases. Under physiological conditions JAK/STAT signalling is rigorously controlled and timely orchestrated by regulatory mechanisms such as expression of the feedback-inhibitor SOCS3 and activation of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN11). Interestingly, the function of negative regulators seems not to be restricted to controlling the strength and timely orchestration of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation. Exemplarily, SOCS3 increases robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against heterogenous STAT3 expression and reduces the amount of information transferred through JAK/STAT signalling. Methods: Here we use multiplexed single-cell analyses and information theoretic approaches to clarify whether also SHP2 contributes to robustness of STAT3 activation and whether SHP2 affects the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling. Results: SHP2 increases robustness of both basal, cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression. However, SHP2 does not affect robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation. In contrast to SOCS3, SHP2 increases the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, probably by reducing cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and thereby increasing sensitivity of the cells. These effects are independent of SHP2-dependent MAPK activation. Conclusion: In summary, the results of this study extend our knowledge of the functions of SHP2 in IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling. SHP2 is not only a repressor of basal and cytokine-induced STAT3 activity, but also ensures robustness and transmission of information. Plain English summary Cells within a multicellular organism communicate with each other to exchange information about the environment. Communication between cells is facilitated by soluble molecules that transmit information from one cell to the other. Cytokines such as interleukin-6 are important soluble mediators that are secreted when an organism is faced with infections or inflammation. Secreted cytokines bind to receptors within the membrane of their target cells. This binding induces activation of an intracellular cascade of reactions called signal transduction, which leads to cellular responses. An important example of intracellular signal transduction is JAK/STAT signalling. In healthy organisms signalling is controlled and timed by regulatory mechanisms, whose activation results in a controlled shutdown of signalling pathways. Interestingly, not all cells within an organism are identical. They differ in the amount of proteins involved in signal transduction, such as STAT3. These differences shape cellular communication and responses to intracellular signalling. Here, we show that an important negative regulatory protein called SHP2 (or PTPN11) is not only responsible for shutting down signalling, but also for steering signalling in heterogeneous cell populations. SHP2 increases robustness of STAT3 activation against variable STAT3 amounts in individual cells. Additionally, it increases the amount of information transferred through JAK/STAT signalling by increasing the dynamic range of pathway activation in heterogeneous cell populations. This is an amazing new function of negative regulatory proteins that contributes to communication in heterogeneous multicellular organisms in health and disease.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
SHP2 (PTPN11) increases robustness of basal and early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against cell-to-cell variation in STAT3 expression, but does not affect robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation. Unlike SOCS3, SHP2 increases the amount of information transferred through early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, likely by reducing basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation and increasing sensitivity.
Key findings
- SHP2 mutation (MEF SHP2 ΔEx3) increased Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation compared with MEF wildtype; reconstitution with wt SHP2 reversed this, confirming SHP2 as a negative regulator of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
- SHP2 increased robustness of basal cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and early (15 min) Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression; mutation of SHP2 significantly reduced robustness independently of Hy-IL-6 dose, and reconstitution restored it.
- SHP2 did not affect robustness of late (90 min) Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 activation; no significant differences were observed between genotypes.
- Channel Capacity of early Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling was approximately 0.7 bit in MEF wt cells and significantly reduced to 0.3 bit when SHP2 was mutated; reconstitution partly restored it. Late Channel Capacity was not affected by SHP2 mutation.
- Inhibition of MAPK with U0126 did not affect robustness or Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, indicating these SHP2 effects are independent of SHP2-dependent MAPK activation.
Methods
- Murine embryonal fibroblasts (MEF wt, MEF SHP2 ΔEx3, and MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 + SHP2) were stimulated with Hyper-IL-6 (Hy-IL-6) for 15 min (early) or 90 min (late), with or without the MEK inhibitor U0126.
- Multiplexed single-cell flow cytometry measured STAT3 expression and STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation simultaneously; Western blotting assessed STAT3, SHP2, SOCS3, ERK1/2, and tubulin/HSC70.
- Mutual Information (MI) quantified dependency between STAT3 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation as a robustness measure; Channel Capacity (CC) quantified maximal information transfer between Hy-IL-6 concentration and STAT3 phosphorylation, using custom Python/scipy and R SLEMI implementations.
Limitations
- The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section; stated future work includes addressing how robustness of MAPK signalling is achieved and whether SHP2 contributes to robustness and information transfer of MAPK signalling.
- Evident from the text: analyses are restricted to MEF cell lines and selected time points (15 min and 90 min), so temporal dynamics and other cell types are not covered.
- Evident from the text: Channel Capacity was below 1 bit and measured at single time points; the authors note that information transfer is higher when signalling dynamics and multiple outputs are considered.
- Evident from the text: MAPK involvement was tested pharmacologically with U0126, not by genetic perturbation, and the study does not resolve direct dephosphorylation targets of SHP2 within JAK/STAT signalling.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
29 of 44 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is increased in MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells compared to MEF wildtype (wt) cells.
“In accordance with previously published results [13], Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is increased in MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells compared to MEF wildtype (wt) cells (Fig. 1a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Lehmann U, Schmitz J, Weissenbach M, Sobota RM, Hortner M, Friederichs K, et al. SHP2 and SOCS3 contribute to Tyr-759-dependent attenuation of interleukin-6 signaling through gp130. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(1):661–71. source
In “SHP2 Contributes to the Attenuation of Interleukin-6 Signal” (Fig. 1B; page unavailable), the paper reports enhanced STAT3 DNA-binding activity in exon-3-mutant murine fibroblasts versus wild-type cells after stimulation with IL-6 and soluble IL-6R. It does not report STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation for that fibroblast comparison. Its Y705-phosphorylation experiment (Fig. 2B; page unavailable) instead uses IL-5-stimulated COS-7 cells expressing catalytically inactive SHP2 mutants. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 mutation mimics a SHP2 knock-out.
- Premisecitation
Robustness of late IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is achieved by expression of SOCS3.
“Robustness of late JAK/STAT signalling is achieved by expression of SOCS3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
- Premisecitation
SHP2 is crucial for IL-6-induced activation of the MAPK pathway.
“Beside it´s function as negative regulator of JAK/STAT signalling SHP2 is crucial for IL-6-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [8, 14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Boulton TG, Zhong Z, Darnell JE Jr, Yancopoulos GD. Choice of STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science. 1995;267(5202):1349–53. source
- cites [14] Schiemann WP, Bartoe JL, Nathanson NM. Box 3-independent signaling mechanisms are involved in leukemia inhibitory factor receptor alpha- and gp130-mediated stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase Evidence for participation of multiple signaling pathways which converge at Ras. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(26):16631–6. source
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) suggest that SHP2 contributes to gp130- and LIFR-mediated MAPK activation. But the experiments used G-CSF-stimulated chimeric receptors, not IL-6 stimulation, and the paper describes SHP2's role as likely and partial rather than establishing it as crucial for IL-6-induced activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Early JAK/STAT signalling is robust as long as STAT3 phosphorylation is low and STAT3 expression is high.
“Early JAK/STAT signalling is robust as long as STAT3 phosphorylation is low (e.g. because of low cytokine concentration) and STAT3 expression is high.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
- Findingown data
With increasing Hy-IL-6 amounts, MI is significantly increased compared to unstimulated MEF wt cells.
“With increasing Hy-IL-6 amounts resulting in stronger phosphorylation of STAT3 (Fig. 2b), MI is significantly increased compared to MI in unstimulated MEF wt cells (Fig. 3d, e, blue boxes and *) [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
The Results section (‘STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is robust for weak stimuli’; page unavailable) says mutual information in MEF cells increases with increasing Hy-IL-6 dose until it plateaus. Our copy does not report a statistical comparison with unstimulated MEF cells, so it does not establish the claimed significant increase relative to that baseline. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingcitation
STAT3 expression is heterogeneous within the MEF wt cell population.
“As shown earlier [20] single cell flow cytometry analyses of STAT3 reveal considerable differences in STAT3 expression within the MEF wt cell population, indicating that individual cells differ strongly in respect to STAT3 protein expression (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Interpretationcitation
This seems to complement the function of SOCS3, which controls robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
“This seems to complement the function of SOCS3, which controls robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Premisecitation
Mutation of SHP2 to prevent recruitment to gp130 or to block phosphatase activity increases basal and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation and STAT3-induced gene expression.
“Mutation of SHP2 to prevent recruitment to gp130 or to block phosphatase activity increases basal and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation and STAT3-induced gene expression [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Lehmann U, Schmitz J, Weissenbach M, Sobota RM, Hortner M, Friederichs K, et al. SHP2 and SOCS3 contribute to Tyr-759-dependent attenuation of interleukin-6 signaling through gp130. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(1):661–71. source
In “SHP2 Contributes to the Attenuation of Interleukin-6 Signal” (page unavailable), the recruitment-defective SHP2 mutant shows enhanced stimulated STAT3 DNA binding and STAT3-responsive reporter activity. The same section reports increased basal and induced STAT3 activation, plus greater reporter activity, for catalytically inactive SHP2. It does not report increased basal STAT3 activation for the recruitment-defective mutant. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The lack of influence of SHP2 on robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation might be explained by the fact that SHP2 itself is phosphorylated rapidly in response to IL-6, which causes dissociation from gp130.
“The lack of influence of SHP2 on robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation (Fig. 4) might be explained by the fact that SHP2 itself is phosphorylated rapidly in response to IL-6 (Fig. 1b) which causes dissociation from gp130 [9–11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Lu W, Gong D, Bar-Sagi D, Cole PA. Site-specific incorporation of a phosphotyrosine mimetic reveals a role for tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 in cell signaling. Mol Cell. 2001;8(4):759–69. source
- cites [10] Lu W, Shen K, Cole PA. Chemical dissection of the effects of tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2. Biochemistry. 2003;42(18):5461–8. source
- cites [11] Schaper F, Gendo C, Eck M, Schmitz J, Grimm C, Anhuf D, et al. Activation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 via the interleukin-6 signal transducing receptor protein gp130 requires tyrosine kinase Jak1 and limits acute-phase protein expression. Biochem J. 1998;335(Pt 3):557–65. source
In “The time-course of SHP2 phosphorylation corresponds to that of gp130” (page unavailable), SHP2 phosphorylation is detected five minutes after IL-6 stimulation, and SHP2–gp130 complex formation follows the phosphorylation time courses. The paper does not establish that phosphorylation of SHP2 causes it to dissociate from gp130; gp130 phosphorylation also declines over that period. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is below 1 bit.
“We confirmed in this study, that Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is below 1 bit (Fig. 6a) [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
- Findingown data
When SHP2 is mutated, Channel Capacity is significantly reduced to 0.3 bit.
“When SHP2 is mutated (green) Channel Capacity is significantly reduced to 0.3 bit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
Late STAT3 phosphorylation is weaker than early STAT3 phosphorylation.
“late STAT3 phosphorylation, which is weaker than early STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 1b)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Median STAT3 phosphorylation increases dose-dependently up to 75 ng/ml Hy-IL-6.
“Median STAT3 phosphorylation increases dose-dependently up to 75 ng/ml Hy-IL-6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MI increases significantly with increasing amounts of Hy-IL-6.
“As shown earlier (Fig. 3e) MI increases significantly with increasing amounts of Hy-IL-6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In unstimulated MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells, MI between STAT3 expression and STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is significantly increased compared to MEF wt cells.
“In unstimulated MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells the MI between STAT3 expression and STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is significantly increased compared to MEF wt cells, indicating that SHP2 increases robustness of basal STAT3 phosphorylation in the pre-stimulation phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingown data
STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation varies strongly within the cell population.
“As seen for STAT3 expression STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation varies strongly within the cell population (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation is not affected by MAPK inhibition.
“Cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation is also not affected by MAPK inhibition (Fig. 5b, Additional file 4: Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Findingown data
The reduction in Channel Capacity caused by SHP2 mutation is partly restored by expression of wt SHP2.
“This reduction is partly restored by expression of wt SHP2 (violet), which suggests that SHP2 in contrast to SOCS3 increases information transfer of early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
Expression of SHP2 ΔEx3 does not significantly affect robustness of late Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
“Interestingly, expression of SHP2 ΔEx3 does not significantly affect robustness of late Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in contrast to early signalling (Fig. 4g, Additional file 3: Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
In unstimulated MEF wt cells, MI between STAT3 expression and STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is low.
“In unstimulated MEF wt cells MI between STAT3 expression and STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is low, indicating that the magnitude of basal STAT3 activation is indeed independent from the magnitude of STAT3 protein expression (Fig. 3d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingown data
Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in MEF wt cells is robust for low cytokine concentrations.
“Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in MEF wt cells is robust for low cytokine concentrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingown data
Robustness, as measured by MI between STAT3 expression and phosphorylation, of cytokine-independent and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against varying STAT3 expression is not affected by inhibition of MAPK.
“Of note, also robustness, as measured by MI between STAT3 expression and phosphorylation, of cytokine-independent and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against varying STAT3 expression is not affected by inhibition of MAPK (Fig. 5c, compare blue and orange, Additional file 5: Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Findingown data
The strength of STAT3 phosphorylation induced by both high and low amounts of Hy-IL-6 is independent of the inhibition of the MAPK pathway.
“In support of Fig. 5a, the strength of STAT3 phosphorylation induced by both high and low amounts of Hy-IL-6 is independent of the inhibition of the MAPK pathway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Findingnone given
SHP2 does not affect robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
“However, SHP2 does not affect robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“SHP2 does not affect robustness of late IL-6-induced STAT3 activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
SOCS3 is not expressed in early signalling.
“In contrast SOCS3 is not expressed in early signalling (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutation of SHP2 does not affect late Channel Capacity.
“Mutation of SHP2 does not affect late Channel Capacity (Fig. 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
Reconstitution of mutant cells with wildtype SHP2 restores robustness of STAT3 activation against varying STAT3 expression.
“Consequently, reconstitution of mutant cells with wildtype SHP2 (SHP2 ΔEx3 + SHP2) restores robustness of STAT3 activation against varying STAT3 expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingnone given
These effects are independent of SHP2-dependent MAPK activation.
“These effects are independent of SHP2-dependent MAPK activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Channel Capacity of early Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling in MEF wt cells is approximately 0.7 bit.
“Channel Capacity of early Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling in MEF wt cells is approximately 0.7 bit (Fig. 6a, blue).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A 15 min stimulation with Hy-IL-6 results in an increase in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation.
“A 15 min stimulation with Hy-IL-6 results in an increase in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SHP2 is expressed in all three phases (pre-stimulation, early, late).
“Of note, SHP2 is expressed in all three phases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Reconstitution with wt SHP2 restores robustness of early STAT3 activation.
“Reconstitution with wt SHP2 (MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 + SHP2 cells) restores robustness (Fig. 3e, compare green and violet) (Additional file 2 Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingown data
SHP2 increases the amount of information transferred (Channel Capacity) through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“In contrast to SOCS3, SHP2 increases the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, probably by reducing cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and thereby increasing sensitivity of the cells.”
- Also stated in: § Background · plain
“In contrast to the feedback-inhibitor SOCS3, SHP2 does not reduce but increases Channel Capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Also stated in: § Background · plain
- Findingown data
Mutation of SHP2 (MEF SHP2 ΔEx3) significantly reduces robustness of STAT3 activation independently of Hy-IL-6 dose.
“Furthermore, mutation of SHP2 (MEF SHP2 ΔEx3) significantly reduces robustness of STAT3 activation independently of Hy-IL-6 dose (Fig. 3e, compare blue and green) (Additional file 2: Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Findingown data
The robustness of late STAT3 phosphorylation is not affected by the concentration of Hy-IL-6.
“In contrast to early STAT3 activation (Fig. 3e) the robustness of late STAT3 phosphorylation is not affected by the concentration of Hy-IL-6 (Fig. 4g)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
IL-6-induced STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation is not reduced in cell populations after inhibition of MAPK activity.
“Consistent with these conclusions, IL-6-induced STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation is not reduced in cell populations after inhibition of MAPK activity (Fig. 5a, b) [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Eulenfeld R, Schaper F. A new mechanism for the regulation of Gab1 recruitment to the plasma membrane. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 1):55–64. source
- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Findingown data
Basal STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is increased when SHP2 is mutated.
“In line with our hypothesis, basal STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation is increased, when SHP2 is mutated (Fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
SHP2 contributes to robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in heterogeneous cell populations.
“Here, we have extended our analyses and to our knowledge for the first time show that the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 also contributes to robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in heterogeneous cell populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Findingown data
Inhibition of MAPK does not affect Channel Capacity of Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“Inhibition of MAPK does not affect Channel Capacity of Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, indicating that the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is independent of SHP2-induced MAPK activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
Functional SHP2 is a negative regulator of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
“This clearly supports that functional SHP2 is a negative regulator of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 mutation mimics a SHP2 knock-out.
- Interpretationown data
SHP2, in contrast to SOCS3, increases information transfer of early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“This reduction is partly restored by expression of wt SHP2 (violet), which suggests that SHP2 in contrast to SOCS3 increases information transfer of early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Interpretationreasoning
SHP2 and SOCS3 enable robustness of STAT3 activation in a timed manner.
“In summary, this raises a scenario in which SHP2 and SOCS3 enable robustness of STAT3 activation in a timed manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SHP2 is expressed constitutively.
- Interpretationreasoning
SHP2 and SOCS3 act opposingly on Channel Capacity.
“Interestingly, SHP2 and SOCS3 act opposingly on Channel Capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SHP2 increases robustness of early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression.
“Thus, SHP2 not only affects robustness of cytokine-independent STAT3 activation but also robustness of early Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“SHP2 increases robustness of both basal, cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
SHP2 most probably directly increases robustness of STAT3 activation, independent of MAPK activation.
“SHP2 most probably directly increases robustness of STAT3 activation, independent of MAPK activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
SHP2 no longer contributes to robustness when SOCS3 is expressed.
“When SOCS3 is expressed it reduces STAT3 phosphorylation and increases robustness [20] while SHP2 no longer contributes to robustness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Interpretationown data
These observations contradict the hypothesis that SHP2-dependent MAPK activation increases robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in heterogeneous cell populations.
“In summary, these observations contradict the hypothesis that SHP2-dependent MAPK activation increases robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in heterogeneous cell populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
SHP2 increases robustness of basal cytokine-independent STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression.
“In summary, SHP2 increases robustness of basal STAT3 phosphorylation against cell-to-cell heterogeneity in STAT3 expression.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“SHP2 increases robustness of both basal, cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation against differential STAT3 expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Premisecitation
Knock down of SHP2 increases basal STAT3 activation.
“Knock down of SHP2 increases basal STAT3 activation [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Dittrich A, Quaiser T, Khouri C, Görtz D, Mönnigmann M, Schaper F. Model-driven experimental analysis of the function of SHP-2 in IL-6-induced Jak/STAT signaling. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8(8):2119–34. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation adds noise to IL-6-induced STAT3 activation thereby reducing information transfer.
“Cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation adds noise to IL-6-induced STAT3 activation thereby reducing information transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SHP2 sensitises cells by reducing basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation.
“This can be explained by the fact, that SHP2 sensitises the cells by reducing basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
- Premisecitation
In cell populations, the mean amount of SHP2 correlates negatively with the strength of STAT3 activation.
“Interestingly, in cell populations the mean amount of SHP2 correlates negatively with the strength of STAT3 activation [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Dittrich A, Quaiser T, Khouri C, Görtz D, Mönnigmann M, Schaper F. Model-driven experimental analysis of the function of SHP-2 in IL-6-induced Jak/STAT signaling. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8(8):2119–34. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Direct dephosphorylation of members of the JAK/STAT pathway by SHP2 is most likely causative for the described effects.
“Therefore, direct dephosphorylation of members of the JAK/STAT pathway by SHP2 is most likely causative for the described effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
The results extend knowledge of the functions of SHP2 in IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling from SHP2 as basal repressor and negative regulator to additionally ensuring robustness and information transfer.
“In conclusion our results extend the knowledge of the functions of SHP2 in the IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling pathway from SHP2 as basal repressor and negative regulator to additionally ensuring robustness and information transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SHP2 does not affect robustness or Channel Capacity indirectly via activation of MAPK.
“Thus, inhibition of MAPK activity does not reflect the effects observed in MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells, indicating that SHP2 does not affect robustness or Channel Capacity indirectly via activation of MAPK.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
These effects are most probably independent of SHP2-induced MAPK activation and hence cross-talk of MAPK and JAK/STAT signalling.
“These effects are most probably independent of SHP2-induced MAPK activation and hence cross-talk of MAPK and JAK/STAT signalling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- Interpretationown data
The amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is independent of SHP2-induced MAPK activation.
“Inhibition of MAPK does not affect Channel Capacity of Hy-IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, indicating that the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is independent of SHP2-induced MAPK activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSOCS3 expression is induced in response to STAT3 activation and therefore SOCS3 is only active in late IL-6-induced signalling.
“SOCS3 expression is induced in response to STAT3 activation [4] and therefore SOCS3 is only active in late IL-6-induced signalling [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Starr R, Willson TA, Viney EM, Murray LJ, Rayner JR, Jenkins BJ, et al. A family of cytokine-inducible inhibitors of signalling. Nature. 1997;387(6636):917–21. source
- cites [5] Fischer P, Lehmann U, Sobota RM, Schmitz J, Niemand C, Linnemann S, et al. The role of the inhibitors of interleukin-6 signal transduction SHP2 and SOCS3 for desensitization of interleukin-6 signalling. Biochem J. 2004;378(Pt 2):449–60. source
Citation [5] is attached to the claim that SOCS3 is active only in late IL-6 signalling. In “Kinetics of SOCS1 and SOCS3 induction resemble that of IL-6 desensitization” (page not provided), the paper instead reports that SOCS3 protein was detectable very early and describes SOCS3 as an IL-6-induced immediate-early gene. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSHP2 is a repressor of basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation.
“Additionally, SHP2 is a repressor of basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation [12, 13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Dittrich A, Quaiser T, Khouri C, Görtz D, Mönnigmann M, Schaper F. Model-driven experimental analysis of the function of SHP-2 in IL-6-induced Jak/STAT signaling. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8(8):2119–34. source
- cites [13] Lehmann U, Schmitz J, Weissenbach M, Sobota RM, Hortner M, Friederichs K, et al. SHP2 and SOCS3 contribute to Tyr-759-dependent attenuation of interleukin-6 signaling through gp130. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(1):661–71. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen SOCS3 is expressed, it reduces STAT3 phosphorylation and increases robustness.
“When SOCS3 is expressed it reduces STAT3 phosphorylation and increases robustness [20] while SHP2 no longer contributes to robustness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSHP2 is rapidly recruited to gp130 and phosphorylated by JAKs, which hints to a function as early feedback inhibitor.
“In response to IL-6 SHP2 is rapidly recruited to gp130 [8] and phosphorylated by JAKs [11], which hints to a function as early feedback inhibitor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Boulton TG, Zhong Z, Darnell JE Jr, Yancopoulos GD. Choice of STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science. 1995;267(5202):1349–53. source
- cites [11] Schaper F, Gendo C, Eck M, Schmitz J, Grimm C, Anhuf D, et al. Activation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 via the interleukin-6 signal transducing receptor protein gp130 requires tyrosine kinase Jak1 and limits acute-phase protein expression. Biochem J. 1998;335(Pt 3):557–65. source
The Introduction reports transient SHP2 phosphorylation alongside gp130 activation and SHP2–gp130 complex formation, and describes SHP2 as inhibitory. In “SHP2 phosphorylation requires specific Jaks,” the paper finds that Jak1 is required but says it cannot determine whether Jak1 phosphorylates SHP2 directly or another kinase does so. Thus it supports JAK-dependent phosphorylation, but not an unqualified claim that JAKs themselves phosphorylate SHP2. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSOCS3 increases robustness of STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation while reducing Channel Capacity of late JAK/STAT signalling.
“While it increases robustness of STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation it reduces Channel Capacity of late JAK/STAT signalling [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChannel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling is restricted by heterogeneity of STAT3 expression and at late time points by expression of SOCS3.
“Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling in general is restricted by heterogeneity of STAT3 expression and in particular at late time points by expression of SOCS3 [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInformation transfer through the JAK/STAT pathway is strongly reduced at late timepoints, which reflects reduced activation of STAT3 at late time points.
“As shown earlier [20] information transfer through the JAK/STAT pathway is strongly reduced at late timepoints, which reflects reduced activation of STAT3 at late time points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSHP2 has a dual function in IL-6-induced signalling: it reduces JAK/STAT signalling and is indispensable for IL-6-induced MAPK pathway activation.
“SHP2 has a dual function in IL-6-induced signalling. While it reduces JAK/STAT signalling it is indispensable for IL-6-induced MAPK pathway activation [32, 33].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Eulenfeld R, Dittrich A, Khouri C, Müller PJ, Mütze B, Wolf A, et al. Interleukin-6 signalling: more than Jaks and STATs. Eur J Cell Biol. 2012;91(6–7):486–95. source
- cites [33] Kim H, Baumann H. Dual signaling role of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in regulating expression of acute-phase plasma proteins by interleukin-6 cytokine receptors in hepatic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(8):5326–38. source
The Abstract states that SHP-2 negatively regulates JAK/STAT signaling and helps mediate gp130-dependent ERK activation in hepatoma cells. But it reports that interfering with SHP-2 reduces ERK activation, not that SHP-2 is indispensable for all IL-6-induced MAPK activation; the claim also omits the hepatic-cell setting. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSTAT3 expression and phosphorylation are highly heterogeneous in isogenic cell populations, and this heterogeneity affects robustness and information transfer of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“We have recently shown that both STAT3 expression and phosphorylation are highly heterogeneous in isogenic cell populations. This heterogeneity affects robustness and information transfer of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSOCS3 reduces Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, while SHP2 increases it.
“While SOCS3 reduces Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling [20], SHP2 increases it (Fig. 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInhibition of SOCS3 expression or lack of SOCS3 binding sites in gp130 results in sustained STAT3 activation and altered physiological outcomes in response to IL-6.
“Inhibition of SOCS3 expression [37] or lack of SOCS3 binding sites in gp130 results in sustained STAT3 activation and altered physiological outcomes in response to IL-6 [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Dittrich A, Khouri C, Sackett SD, Ehlting C, Böhmer O, Albrecht U, et al. Glucocorticoids increase interleukin-6-dependent gene induction by interfering with the expression of the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 feedback inhibitor. Hepatology. 2012;55(1):256–66. source
- cites [38] Schmitz J, Weissenbach M, Haan S, Heinrich PC, Schaper F. SOCS3 exerts its inhibitory function on interleukin-6 signal transduction through the SHP2 recruitment site of gp130. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(17):12848–56. source
The introductory passage (page unavailable) says mutation of gp130 Tyr-759 produces enhanced and prolonged STAT3 activation and increased gene induction. The SOCS3-binding discussion (page unavailable) also reports that this mutation impairs SOCS3 inhibition of STAT3 and an acute-phase protein gene promoter. These passages support the signaling and gene-expression findings, but do not establish altered physiological outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInterfering with the interaction of SHP2 with PD-1 is a potent alternative to immuno-oncologic approaches aiming to block PD-1 with antibodies in several cancers.
“Additionally, interfering with the interaction of SHP2 with programmed death-1 (PD-1) is a potent alternative to immuno-oncologic approaches aiming to block PD-1 with antibodies in several cancers [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Fan Z, Tian Y, Chen Z, Liu L, Zhou Q, He J, et al. Blocking interaction between SHP2 and PD-1 denotes a novel opportunity for developing PD-1 inhibitors. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12(6):e11571. source
The Impact and Discussion sections describe blocking PD-1/SHP2 interaction as a promising alternative strategy to antibody-based PD-1 inhibition and report a potent inhibitor. The Results report antitumor effects in mouse tumor models, including a lung-cancer model, but do not establish it as an effective alternative in patients with several cancers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSerin phosphorylation contributes to reduction of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation, thereby increasing robustness of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation to varying STAT3 expression.
“Serin phosphorylation contributes to reduction of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation [46], thereby increasing robustness of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation to varying STAT3 expression [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Chung J, Uchida E, Grammer TC, Blenis J. STAT3 serine phosphorylation by ERK-dependent and -independent pathways negatively modulates its tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(11):6508–16. source
- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHypermethylation of the SOCS3 promoter and reduced SOCS3 expression is associated with proliferative diseases.
“Additionally, hypermethylation of the SOCS3 promoter and reduced SOCS3 expression is associated with proliferative diseases [39, 40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] He B, You L, Uematsu K, Zang K, Xu Z, Lee AY, et al. SOCS-3 is frequently silenced by hypermethylation and suppresses cell growth in human lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):14133–8. source
- cites [40] Sutherland KD, Lindeman GJ, Choong DY, Wittlin S, Brentzell L, Phillips W, et al. Differential hypermethylation of SOCS genes in ovarian and breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 2004;23(46):7726–33. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLoss-of-function as well as gain-of-function mutations and/or overexpression of SHP2 are found in various diseases such as different cancer types, Noonan syndrome, and LEOPARD syndrome.
“Loss-of-function as well as gain-of-function mutations and/or overexpression of SHP2 are found in various diseases such as different cancer types [49], Noonan- [50], and LEOPARD-syndrome [51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [49] Bollu LR, Mazumdar A, Savage MI, Brown PH. Molecular pathways: targeting protein tyrosine phosphatases in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(9):2136–42. source
The cited paper’s “Phosphatases as Oncogenes” section reports SHP2 overexpression in leukemia and breast cancer, and activating SHP2 mutations associated with childhood leukemias. It does not report loss-of-function SHP2 mutations in cancer. The Noonan and LEOPARD syndrome portions of the citing sentence have separate citations and are not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] Tartaglia M, Gelb BD. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:45–68. source
- cites [51] Yu ZH, Zhang RY, Walls CD, Chen L, Zhang S, Wu L, et al. Molecular basis of gain-of-function LEOPARD syndrome-associated SHP2 mutations. Biochemistry. 2014;53(25):4136–51. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMechanisms that reduce IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation such as expression of SOCS3 and STAT3-S727 phosphorylation increase robustness of signalling against varying STAT3 expression but reduce the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“Mechanisms that reduce IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation such as expression of SOCS3 and STAT3-S727 phosphorylation on the one hand increase robustness of signalling against varying STAT3 expression. On the other hand, these mechanisms reduce the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Billing U, Jetka T, Nortmann L, Wundrack N, Komorowski M, Waldherr S, et al. Robustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling. Commun Biol. 2019;2:27. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSTAT3 expression distribution is independent of Hy-IL-6.
“The expression and distribution of STAT3 within the cell population are however independent from Hy-IL-6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIL-6-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was efficiently blocked by U0126, while STAT3 activation was seemingly unaffected.
“IL-6-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was efficiently blocked by U0126, while STAT3 activation was seemingly unaffected (Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLate Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation is dose-dependent and heterogeneous but weaker than early STAT3 activation.
“Late Hy-IL-6-induced STAT3-phosphorylation is dose-dependent and heterogenous (Fig. 4b, d, f) but as also shown in Fig. 1B weaker than early STAT3 activation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSHP2 reduces robustness of cytokine-independent and early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling against differential STAT3 expression.
“SHP2 reduces robustness of cytokine-independent and early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling against differential STAT3 expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPharmacological inhibition of MAPK activation reduces neither robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation nor Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“However, pharmacological inhibition of MAPK activation reduces neither robustness of IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 5c) nor Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling (Fig. 6c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLate STAT3 phosphorylation is independent from STAT3 expression and thus robust.
“supporting the hypothesis that late STAT3 phosphorylation, which is weaker than early STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 1b), is independent from STAT3 expression and thus robust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSOCS3 inhibits JAK activity and thereby contributes to the transient activation profile of STAT3.
“The negative feedback inhibitor suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) inhibits JAK activity and thereby contributes to the transient activation profile of STAT3 [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Endo TA, Masuhara M, Yokouchi M, Suzuki R, Sakamoto H, Mitsui K, et al. A new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases. Nature. 1997;387(6636):921–4. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSHP2 contributes to robustness of basal, cytokine independent STAT3 activation and to robustness of early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.
“In summary, SHP2 contributes to robustness of basal, cytokine independent STAT3 activation and to robustness of early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSHP2 is not only a repressor of basal and cytokine-induced STAT3 activity, but also ensures robustness and transmission of information.
“SHP2 is not only a repressor of basal and cytokine-induced STAT3 activity, but also ensures robustness and transmission of information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe increase in information transfer by SHP2 is probably caused by reducing cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and thereby increasing sensitivity of the cells.
“In contrast to SOCS3, SHP2 increases the amount of information transferred through IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, probably by reducing cytokine-independent STAT3 activation and thereby increasing sensitivity of the cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBased on the results presented here, mutations within PTPN11 and pharmaceutical inhibition of SHP2 probably not only affect strength of intracellular signalling but also induce changes in robustness and information transfer of multiple signalling pathways.
“Based on the results presented here mutations within PTPN11 and pharmaceutical inhibition of SHP2 probably not only affect strength of intracellular signalling but also induce changes in robustness and information transfer of multiple signalling pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInhibition of SHP2 is seen as a promising strategy for treating several receptor tyrosine kinase-driven cancers.
“Inhibition of SHP2 is seen as a promising strategy for treating several receptor tyrosine kinase-driven cancers [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Chen YN, LaMarche MJ, Chan HM, Fekkes P, Garcia-Fortanet J, Acker MG, et al. Allosteric inhibition of SHP2 phosphatase inhibits cancers driven by receptor tyrosine kinases. Nature. 2016;535(7610):148–52. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSHP2 increases robustness of basal and early cytokine-induced STAT3 activation, while SOCS3 increases robustness of late cytokine-induced STAT3 activation.
“While SHP2 increases robustness of basal and early cytokine-induced STAT3 activation (Fig. 3), SOCS3 increases robustness of late cytokine-induced STAT3 activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSHP2 function is not restricted to IL-6-induced signalling; SHP2 is also a major regulator of signalling induced by other cytokines and growth factors.
“SHP2 function is not restricted to IL-6-induced signalling but SHP2 is also a major regulator of signalling induced by other cytokines and growth factors [48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Tajan M, de Rocca SA, Valet P, Edouard T, Yart A. SHP2 sails from physiology to pathology. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58(10):509–25. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSHP2 increases robustness and information transfer of early IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and ensures independence of basal STAT3 phosphorylation from varying STAT3 expression.
“In summary, our data highlight new functions of the phosphatase SHP2 in ensuring robust STAT3 activity despite heterogeneous STAT3 expression. SHP2 increases robustness and information transfer of early IL-6-induced STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and ensures independence of basal STAT3 phosphorylation from varying STAT3 expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSOCS3 and SHP2 act in a timely orchestrated manner and complement each other.
“Of note, SOCS3 and SHP2 act in a timely orchestrated manner and complement each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SHP2 is expressed constitutively.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSHP2 does not affect robustness and information transfer of late IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling.
“However, SHP2 does not affect robustness and information transfer of late IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling, indicating a timely orchestration of mechanisms that enable cells to cope with cellular heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not known whether SHP2 affects robustness and Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced signalling.
“So far, it is not known whether the phosphatase SHP2 affects robustness and Channel Capacity of IL-6-induced signalling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Protein expression, including expression of signalling proteins, is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.
“Protein expression including the expression of signalling proteins is highly heterogeneous even in isogenic cells from the same tissue or organ.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cell-to-cell heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.
“This heterogeneity shapes activation and inactivation of signalling pathways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MEF cells do not express transmembrane IL-6Rα, so IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in MEF cells depends on trans-signalling enabled by IL-6:sIL-6Rα complexes.
“MEF cells, like most other cells, do not express transmembrane IL-6Rα. Hence, IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in MEF cells depends on trans-signalling enabled by IL-6:soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL-6Rα) complexes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 mutation mimics a SHP2 knock-out.
“This mutation prevents recruitment of SHP2 to the phosphorylated tyrosine motif 759 within gp130, thereby mimicking a SHP2 knock-out.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SHP2 is expressed constitutively.
“SHP2 is expressed constitutively, which enables it to act on basal and early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells specifically lack SHP2 function and expression of wt SHP2 in these cells restores SHP2 function.
“When SHP2 is mutated (green) Channel Capacity is significantly reduced to 0.3 bit. This reduction is partly restored by expression of wt SHP2 (violet)”
The paper relies on this without support.
U0126 at 10 µM specifically inhibits MEK/MAPK without affecting JAK/STAT signalling.
“IL-6-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was efficiently blocked by U0126, while STAT3 activation was seemingly unaffected (Fig. 5a).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
SHP2 is said to both reduce and increase robustness
MinorThe MAPK section says SHP2 reduces robustness of basal and early signalling, whereas the results section concludes that SHP2 increases robustness in those same phases. The opposing statement reverses a central conclusion.
“SHP2 reduces robustness of cytokine-independent and early IL-6-induced JAK/STAT signalling against differential STAT3 expression.”
“In summary, SHP2 contributes to robustness of basal, cytokine independent STAT3 activation and to robustness of early IL-6-induced STAT3 activation.”
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486 · see citing works
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 37,139 · see citing works
Zhou, F., Yu, T., Du, R., Fan, G., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Xiang, J., Wang, Y., Song, B., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30566-3 · Cited by 27,263 · see citing works
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,938 · see citing works
Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation.
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0024338 · Cited by 5,199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To account for different sample sizes and variance in A and B, σ can be substituted by the square root of the sum of the sum of squares (SSA and SSB) divided by the sum of degrees of freedom (df ) [29].”
MethodDensity Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Dehnad, K., & Silverman, B. W. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269475 · Cited by 3,760 · see citing works
Elements of Information Theory
Nalewajski, R. F. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20180-6_8 · Cited by 2,310 · see citing works
A family of cytokine-inducible inhibitors of signalling
Starr, R., Willson, T. A., Viney, E. M., Murray, L. J. L., Rayner, J. R., Jenkins, B. J., Gonda, T. J., Alexander, W. S., Metcalf, D., Nicola, N. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43206 · Cited by 2,066 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SOCS3 expression is induced in response to STAT3 activation [4] and therefore SOCS3 is only active in late IL-6-induced signalling [5].”
BackgroundThe statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.
Cohen, J. (1962) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045186 · Cited by 1,824 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Effect Size d is a standardized score for the mean difference between two groups A and B using the population standard deviation σ as normalisation factor [28].”
MethodA new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases
Endo, T. A., Masuhara, M., Yokouchi, M., Suzuki, R., Sakamoto, H., Mitsui, K., Matsumoto, A., Tanimura, S., Ohtsubo, M., Misawa, H., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43213 · Cited by 1,408 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The negative feedback inhibitor suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) inhibits JAK activity and thereby contributes to the transient activation profile of STAT3 [3].”
BackgroundStahl, N., Farruggella, T. J., Boulton, T. G., Zhong, Z., Darnell, J. E., & Yancopoulos, G. D. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7871433 · Cited by 979 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Beside it ́s function as negative regulator of JAK/STAT signalling SHP2 is crucial for IL6-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [8, 14].”
BackgroundAllosteric inhibition of SHP2 phosphatase inhibits cancers driven by receptor tyrosine kinases
Chen, Y.-N. P., LaMarche, M. J., Chan, H. M., Fekkes, P., Garcia-Fortanet, J., Acker, M. G., Antonakos, B., Chen, C. H.-T., Chen, Z., Cooke, V. G., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18621 · Cited by 925 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inhibition of SHP2 is seen as a promising strategy for treating several receptor tyrosine kinase-driven cancers [52].”
BackgroundEquitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient
Kinney, J. B., & Atwal, G. S. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309933111 · Cited by 667 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MI is known to be a sensitive method to detect different patterns of interdependence [31].”
MethodChung, J., Uchida, E., Grammer, T. C., & Blenis, J. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.11.6508 · Cited by 620 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Serin phosphorylation contributes to reduction of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation [46], thereby increasing robustness of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation to varying STAT3 expression [20].”
BackgroundA bioactive designer cytokine for human hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion
Fischer, M., Goldschmitt, J., Peschel, C., Brakenhoff, J. P. J., Kallen, K., Wollmer, A., Grötzinger, J., & Rose‐John, S. (1997) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0297-142 · Cited by 532 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As a remedy for analyses of dose-dependent effects of IL-6 trans-signalling, Hyper-IL-6 (Hy-IL-6), a fusion protein of IL-6 and sIL-6Rα [30], is used.”
Information Transduction Capacity of Noisy Biochemical Signaling Networks
Cheong, R., Rhee, A., Wang, C. J., Nemenman, I. M., & Levchenko, A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204553 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Interleukin-6: Biology, signaling and strategies of blockade
Schaper, F., & Rose‐John, S. (2015) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.004 · Cited by 511 · cited 2× · see citing works
“After their recruitment to the receptor STATs are phosphorylated by JAKs, dimerize and translocate into the nucleus [2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAbnormal mesoderm patterning in mouse embryos mutant for the SH2 tyrosine phosphatase Shp‐2
Saxton, T. M., Henkemeyer, M. J., Gasca, S., Shen, R., Rossi, D. J., Shalaby, F., Feng, G., & Pawson, T. J. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.9.2352 · Cited by 481 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We made use of murine embryonal fibroblasts (MEF) expressing a mutant SHP2 protein lacking 65 amino acids within the N-terminal SH2-domain (ΔEx3) [21].”
MethodSchmitz, J., Weissenbach, M., Haan, S., Heinrich, P. C., & Schaper, F. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.17.12848 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inhibition of SOCS3 expression [37] or lack of SOCS3 binding sites in gp130 results in sustained STAT3 activation and altered physiological outcomes in response to IL-6 [38].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSOCS-3 is frequently silenced by hypermethylation and suppresses cell growth in human lung cancer
He, B., You, L., Uematsu, K., Zang, K., Xu, Z., Lee, A. Y., Costello, J. F., McCormick, F., & Jablons, D. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2232790100 · Cited by 380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, hypermethylation of the SOCS3 promoter and reduced SOCS3 expression is associated with proliferative diseases [39, 40].”
BackgroundAccurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks
Selimkhanov, J., Taylor, B. E., Yao, J. J., Pilko, A., Albeck, J. G., Hoffmann, A., Tsimring, L. S., & Wollman, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254933 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
NOONAN SYNDROME AND RELATED DISORDERS: Genetics and Pathogenesis
Tartaglia, M., & Gelb, B. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162305 · Cited by 355 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Loss-of-function as well as gain-of-function mutations and/or overexpression of SHP2 are found in various diseases such as different cancer types [49], Noonan- [50], and LEOPARD-syndrome [51].”
BackgroundRevealing mechanisms for SH2 domain mediated regulation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2
Barford, D., & Neel, B. G. (1998) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00027-6 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Takahashi-Tezuka, M., Yoshida, Y., Fukada, T., Ohtani, T., Yamanaka, Y., Nishida, K., Nakajima, K., Hibi, M., & Hirano, T. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.7.4109 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Zhang, S. Q., Tsiaras, W. G., Araki, T., Wen, G., Minichiello, L., Klein, R., & Neel, B. G. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.12.4062-4072.2002 · Cited by 283 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, altered MAPK activation in MEF SHP2 ΔEx3 cells [47] could indirectly contribute to the reduced robustness of STAT3 activation and Channel Capacity in SHP2 mutant cells (Fig.”
BackgroundLu, W., Gong, D., Bar-Sagi, D., & Cole, P. A. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00369-0 · Cited by 268 · cited 1× · see citing works
“to phosphorylated tyrosine motifs in other proteins, such as phosphorylated Y759 in gp130 [8], or to the two phosphorylated tyrosine motifs within SHP2 itself [9, 10].”
BackgroundSHP2 and SOCS3 Contribute to Tyr-759-dependent Attenuation of Interleukin-6 Signaling through gp130
Lehmann, U., Schmitz, J., Weissenbach, M., Sobota, R. M., Hörtner, M., Friederichs, K., Behrmann, I., Tsiaris, W., Sasaki, A., Schneider-Mergener, J., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m210552200 · Cited by 236 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Additionally, SHP2 is a repressor of basal cytokine-independent STAT3 phosphorylation [12, 13].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationSHP2 sails from physiology to pathology
Tajan, M., de Rocca Serra, A., Valet, P., Edouard, T., & Yart, A. (2015) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.08.005 · Cited by 232 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SHP2 function is not restricted to IL-6-induced signalling but SHP2 is also a major regulator of signalling induced by other cytokines and growth factors [48].”
BackgroundDifferential hypermethylation of SOCS genes in ovarian and breast carcinomas
Sutherland, K. D., Lindeman, G. J., Choong, D. Y. H., Wittlin, S., Brentzell, L., Phillips, W., Campbell, I. G., & Visvader, J. E. (2004) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207787 · Cited by 217 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, hypermethylation of the SOCS3 promoter and reduced SOCS3 expression is associated with proliferative diseases [39, 40].”
BackgroundRegulation of Early Events in Integrin Signaling by Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Oh, E., Gu, H., Saxton, T. M., Timms, J. F., Hausdorff, S. F., Frevert, E. U., Kahn, B. B., Pawson, T. J., Neel, B. G., & Thomas, S. Μ. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.4.3205 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
A Novel Role for Gab1 and SHP2 in Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Ras Activation
Montagner, A., Yart, A., Dance, M., Perret, B., Salles, J., & Raynal, P. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m410012200 · Cited by 205 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Bongartz H, Gille K, Hessenkemper W, Mandel K, Lewitzky M, Feller SM, et al. The multi-site docking protein Grb2-associated binder 1 (Gab1) enhances interleukin-6-induced MAPK-pathway activation in an SHP2-, Grb2-, and time-dependent manner.”
BackgroundInfluentialEck, M. J., Pluskey, S., Trüb, T., Harrison, S. C., & Shoelson, S. E. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379277a0 · Cited by 199 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the C-terminal part of SHP2 two regulatory tyrosine-residues are located [6].”
BackgroundSCHAPER, F., GENDO, C., ECK, M., SCHMITZ, J., GRIMM, C., ANHUF, D., KERR, I. M., & HEINRICH, P. C. (1998) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3350557 · Cited by 178 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Binding of SHP2 to the (p)Y759 motif in gp130 and subsequent phosphorylation by JAKs initiates activation of MAPK by recruiting growth factor-receptor-bound protein/son of sevenless (Grb/SOS) complex and/or Grb2-associated binder-1 (Gab1) to the membrane [15–17].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationInterleukin-6 signalling: More than Jaks and STATs
Eulenfeld, R., Dittrich, A., Khouri, C., Müller, P. J., Mütze, B., Wolf, A., & Schaper, F. (2012) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.09.010 · Cited by 171 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Crosstalk between activation of MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways fine-tunes signalling [32].”
BackgroundSelf-citationKim, H., & Baumann, H. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.8.5326 · Cited by 170 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While it reduces JAK/ STAT signalling it is indispensable for IL-6-induced MAPK pathway activation [32, 33].”
BackgroundMolecular Pathways: Targeting Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Cancer
Bollu, L. R., Mazumdar, A., Savage, M. I., & Brown, P. H. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0934 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Robustness and Compensation of Information Transmission of Signaling Pathways
Uda, S., Saito, T. H., Kudo, T., Kokaji, T., Tsuchiya, T., Kubota, H., Komori, Y., Ozaki, Y.-I., & Kuroda, S. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234511 · Cited by 154 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Consequently, these approaches are becoming more and more important for understanding mechanisms of cellular signalling [35, 36].”
BackgroundInformation theory based approaches to cellular signaling
Waltermann, C., & Klipp, E. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.07.009 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Multiplexed single-cell data and methods from information theory are used to address and quantify consequences of heterogenous protein expression [19].”
MethodFundamental trade-offs between information flow in single cells and cellular populations
Suderman, R., Bachman, J. A., Smith, A. S., Sorger, P. K., & Deeds, E. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615660114 · Cited by 105 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, low information transfer on the single cell level is discussed to be a prerequisite for high information transfer on population level [44, 45].”
BackgroundInformation transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems
Voliotis, M., Perrett, R. M., McWilliams, C., McArdle, C. A., & Bowsher, C. G. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314446111 · Cited by 98 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, in epidermal-growth factor (EGF)-induced MAPK signalling, information transfer is increased by negative regulation in the presence of basal activity [41].”
BackgroundSchiemann, W. P., Bartoe, J. L., & Nathanson, N. M. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.26.16631 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Beside it ́s function as negative regulator of JAK/STAT signalling SHP2 is crucial for IL6-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [8, 14].”
BackgroundMolecular Basis of Gain-of-Function LEOPARD Syndrome-Associated SHP2 Mutations
Yu, Z.-H., Zhang, R.-Y., Walls, C. D., Chen, L., Zhang, S., Wu, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, Z.-Y. (2014) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi5002695 · Cited by 87 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Loss-of-function as well as gain-of-function mutations and/or overexpression of SHP2 are found in various diseases such as different cancer types [49], Noonan- [50], and LEOPARD-syndrome [51].”
BackgroundSensing relative signal in the Tgf-β/Smad pathway
Frick, C. L., Yarka, C., Nunns, H., & Goentoro, L. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611428114 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“for growth factor and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced MAPK signalling [36, 42] and for transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-dependent SMAD activation [43].”
BackgroundFISCHER, P., LEHMANN, U., SOBOTA, R. M., SCHMITZ, J., NIEMAND, C., LINNEMANN, S., HAAN, S., BEHRMANN, I., YOSHIMURA, A., JOHNSTON, J. A., et al. (2004) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20030893 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SOCS3 expression is induced in response to STAT3 activation [4] and therefore SOCS3 is only active in late IL-6-induced signalling [5].”
BackgroundSelf-citationRobustness and Information Transfer within IL-6-induced JAK/STAT Signalling
Billing, U., Jetka, T., Nortmann, L., Wundrack, N., Komorowski, M., Waldherr, S., Schaper, F., & Dittrich, A. (2019) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-018-0259-4 · Cited by 64 · cited 10× · see citing works
“While it increases robustness of STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation it reduces Channel Capacity of late JAK/STAT signalling [20].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFan, Z., Tian, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, L., Zhou, Q., He, J., Coleman, J., Dong, C., Li, N., Huang, J., et al. (2020) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201911571 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, interfering with the interaction of SHP2 with programmed death-1 (PD-1) is a potent alternative to immuno-oncologic approaches aiming to block PD-1 with antibodies in several cancers [53].”
BackgroundChemical Dissection of the Effects of Tyrosine Phosphorylation of SHP-2
Lu, W., Shen, K., & Cole, P. A. (2003) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi0340144 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“to phosphorylated tyrosine motifs in other proteins, such as phosphorylated Y759 in gp130 [8], or to the two phosphorylated tyrosine motifs within SHP2 itself [9, 10].”
BackgroundA new mechanism for the regulation of Gab1 recruitment to the plasma membrane
Eulenfeld, R., & Schaper, F. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.037226 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationDittrich, A., Khouri, C., Sackett, S. D., Ehlting, C., Böhmer, O., Albrecht, U., Bode, J. G., Trautwein, C., & Schaper, F. (2012) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24655 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inhibition of SOCS3 expression [37] or lack of SOCS3 binding sites in gp130 results in sustained STAT3 activation and altered physiological outcomes in response to IL-6 [38].”
BackgroundSelf-citationInformation-theoretic analysis of multivariate single-cell signaling responses
Jetka, T., Nienałtowski, K., Winarski, T., et al. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007132 · Cited by 48 · cited 2× · see citing works
“com/ TJetka/ LogRe gCapa city which is based on statistical learning methods and Monte Carlo for efficient computation, described and validated elsewhere [27].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationInformation Transfer in Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Signaling
Garner, K., Perrett, R. M., Voliotis, M., Bowsher, C. G., Pope, G. R., Pham, T. T., Caunt, C. J., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K. T., & McArdle, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.686964 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“for growth factor and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced MAPK signalling [36, 42] and for transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-dependent SMAD activation [43].”
BackgroundInformation Theory: New Look at Oncogenic Signaling Pathways
Zielińska, K. A., & Katanaev, V. L. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.08.005 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Discussion The application of information theoretic approaches to intracellular signalling allows to address features of signalling pathways such as robustness, redundancy, and signal amplification that are highly relevant for physiological and pathophysiological signalling [34].”
BackgroundAn information-theoretic framework for deciphering pleiotropic and noisy biochemical signaling
Jetka, T., Nienałtowski, K., Filippi, S. L., Stumpf, M. P. H., & Komorowski, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07085-1 · Cited by 34 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Additionally, low information transfer on the single cell level is discussed to be a prerequisite for high information transfer on population level [44, 45].”
BackgroundSelf-citationModel-driven experimental analysis of the function of SHP-2 in IL-6-induced Jak/STAT signaling
Dittrich, A., Quaiser, T., Khouri, C., Görtz, D., Mönnigmann, M., & Schaper, F. (2012) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c2mb05488d · Cited by 32 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Interestingly, in cell populations the mean amount of SHP2 correlates negatively with the strength of STAT3 activation [12].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBongartz, H., Gille, K., Hessenkemper, W., Mandel, K., Lewitzky, M., Feller, S., & Schaper, F. (2019) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-019-0451-2 · Cited by 28 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Bongartz H, Gille K, Hessenkemper W, Mandel K, Lewitzky M, Feller SM, et al. The multi-site docking protein Grb2-associated binder 1 (Gab1) enhances interleukin-6-induced MAPK-pathway activation in an SHP2-, Grb2-, and time-dependent manner.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rah, B., Rather, R. A., Bhat, G. R., Baba, A. B., Mushtaq, I., Farooq, M., Yousuf, T., Dar, S. B., Parveen, S., Hassan, R., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.821344 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
“13:821344. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821344 Frontiers in Pharmacology | www.frontiersin.org March 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 8213441 REVIEW published: 24 March 2022 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821344 promoter region of a gene to regulate the mechanism of transcription (Fiebelkow et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialA comprehensive review of SHP2 and its role in cancer
Asmamaw, M. D., Shi, X.-J., Zhang, L.-R., & Liu, H.-M. (2022) · Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1007/s13402-022-00698-1 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“This promotes STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705 and activation, leading to activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling [39, 68, 176].”
BackgroundDefining the Role of Anti- and Pro-inflammatory Outcomes of Interleukin-6 in Mental Health
García‐Juárez, M., & Camacho‐Morales, A. (2022) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.03.020 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
miRNAs as potential game-changers in head and neck cancer: Future clinical and medicinal uses
El‐Mahdy, H. A., Mohamadin, A. M., Abulsoud, A. I., Khidr, E. G., El-Husseiny, A. A., Ismail, A., Elsakka, E. G. E., Mokhlis, H. A., El‐Husseiny, H. M., & Doghish, A. S. (2023) · Pathology - Research and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.prp.2023.154457 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Interleukin-6 in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Janus-Faced Player in Damage and Repair
Ciryam, P., Gerzanich, V., & Simard, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2023.0135 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
STING activation in macrophages by vanillic acid exhibits antineoplastic potential
Zhu, M., Tang, X., Zhu, Z., Gong, Z., Tang, W., Hu, Y., Cheng, C., Wang, H., Sarwar, A., Chen, Y., et al. (2023) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115618 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Tyrosine phosphatase PTPN11/SHP2 in solid tumors - bull’s eye for targeted therapy?
Chen, X., Keller, S. J., Hafner, P., Alrawashdeh, A. Y., Avery, T. Y., Norona, J., Zhou, J., & Ruess, D. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1340726 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Targeting SHP2 phosphatase in hematological malignancies
Kanumuri, R., Pasupuleti, S. K., Burns, S. S., Ramdas, B., & Kapur, R. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1080/14728222.2022.2066518 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“As dysregulation of JAK/STAT signaling is connected to inflammatory and proliferative diseases, the ability of SHP2 to regulate JAK/STAT signaling provides a potential role for SHP2 in diseases affected by inflammation [63].”
BackgroundCai, L., Li, D., Feng, Z., Gu, X., Xu, Q., & Li, Q. (2022) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2022/3153362 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“So, there might be a negative regulation responsible for the expression level of TGF-β to begin to reduce after a sharp increase [38].”
BackgroundRole of Ischemia/Reperfusion and Oxidative Stress in Shock State
Vázquez-Galán, Y. I., Guzmán-Silahua, S., Trujillo-Rangel, W. Á., & Rodríguez-Lara, S. Q. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14110808 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Kotyla, P. J., Gumkowska-Sroka, O., Wnuk, B. R., & Kotyla, K. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15080936 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“These translocate to the nucleus to modulate the promoter region of specific genes and orchestrate transcription [21].”
BackgroundDong, B., Zhu, J., Chen, X., Jiang, H., Deng, Y., Xu, L., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2023) · Aging and Disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2023.0306 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zuo, L., Hai, Y., Zhang, R., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175825 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ashour, L. (2022) · Tissue Barriers · doi:10.1080/21688370.2022.2090792 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Liu, G., Dai, Y., Fu, C.-Y., Lv, X., Qin, J., & Xie, J. (2025) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s516001 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Abnormal phosphorylation of protein tyrosine in neurodegenerative diseases
Shu, L., Du, C., & Zuo, Y. (2023) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/nlad066 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Cai, B., Li, Y., Xu, Y. J., Wang, Y., Zheng, L., Zheng, X., Yin, L., Chen, G., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1098463 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lin, J., Lu, W., Cheng, S., et al. (2025) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.07.031 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hou, Y., Lu, X., Xu, Z., Qu, J., & Huang, J. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra07472a · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The tyrosine phosphatase PTPN14 inhibits the activation of STAT3 in PEDV infected Vero cells.
Huang, H., Li, Y.-T., Li, D.-L., Wang, L., Jiao, W.-Q., Bai, Y.-L., & Zhang, G.-P. (2022) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2022.109391 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Sanhuang Xiexin Decoction Ameliorates TNBC By Modulating JAK2-STAT3 and Lipid Metabolism
Qi, Y., Wu, X.-J., Shi, J., Shi, X., Zhao, N., Xiong, Y., & Wang, L. (2023) · Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11655-023-3555-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Interleukin-6 in non-infectious uveitis: Biology, experimental evidence and treatment strategies
Yu, X., Duan, R., Jiang, L., Wang, T., Li, Z., Zhang, B., Su, W., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116605 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wu, Z., Lian, G., He, L., Hu, P., Guo, Y., & Su, Z. (2026) · Immunology and Cell Biology · doi:10.1111/imcb.70078 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Setting sail: Maneuvering SHP2 activity and its effects in cancer
Welsh, C. L., Allen, S., & Madan, L. K. (2023) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2023.03.003 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Schaper, F., Jetka, T., & Dittrich, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research · doi:10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100351 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, C., Xu, G., Chen, J., Wu, C., Zhang, J., Jiang, J., Hong, H., & Cui, Z. (2023) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110942 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Phosphatase Dysregulation in Cancer: Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Opportunities
Jama, M., Overduin, M., & Barakat, K. (2025) · MedComm – Oncology · doi:10.1002/mog2.70028 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhao, J., et al. (2022) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-22-4311 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pandey, G., Mazzacurati, L., Rowsell, T. M., Horvat, N. P., Amin, N. E., Zhang, G., Akuffo, A. A., Colin, C., Haura, E. B., Kuykendall, A. T., et al. (2024) · American Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1002/ajh.27282 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Shao, L., Wang, N., Yan, Y., Tan, Y., Wu, Q., Lei, L., Wang, M., & Liu, L. (2024) · PubMed Central · doi:10.22038/ijbms.2024.72049.15662 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Azhar, A. S., Abdel‐Naim, A. B., & Ashour, O. M. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19936-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“This is strengthened by the observed ability of 2ME to inhibit IL-6 production, which significantly contributes to phosphorylation of STAT and activation of the JAK-1/STAT3 axis (Takizawa et al. 2001; Fiebelkow et al. 2021).”
BackgroundCouch, A. C. M., Brown, A. M., Raimundo, C., Solomon, S., Taylor, M., Sichlinger, L., Matulevičiūtė, R., Srivastava, D. P., & Vernon, A. C. (2024) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.08.007 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Involvement and Therapeutic Implication of JAK-STAT Pathway in Cancer
Rehman, A., Khan, N. A., Rashid, G., Tamanna, S., Jindal, R., Seth, N., Bashir, B., Mushtaq, G., Salman, M., & Parveen, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2763-9_8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Circulating miR-548c-3p possesses good diagnostic potential for metabolic syndrome
Dandare, A., Liaquat, A., Rafiq, M., Javeres, M. N. L., Younis, S., & Khan, M. J. (2022) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2022.06.008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tan, H.-Y., Xiang, Y.-L., Tan, M.-J., et al. (2025) · Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1080/13813455.2025.2502451 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Balancing the Edge: Phosphatases as Homeostatic Buffers of Oncogenic Kinase Signaling in Cancer
Ehm, P. A. H. (2026) · Kinases and Phosphatases · doi:10.3390/kinasesphosphatases4010004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Lü, H., Ruan, Y., Huang, S., Deng, S., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zhao, Z., Feng, L., & Guo, W. (2024) · Natural Product Communications · doi:10.1177/1934578x241288428 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Tan, X., Wang, T., Yuan, Y., Su, K., Shang, E., Xiao, Q., Guo, S., Su, S., Zhang, H., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330621 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kashtanjeva, L., Ruhland, C., Horstmeier, F. C., Thives-Kurenbach, F., Ettich, J., Padrini, G., Streuber, S., Scheller, J., Dittrich, A., & Floss, D. M. (2026) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-025-02593-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationThe language of cytokines: Decoding immune signals with information theory
Streuber, S., Rieneck, E., Schaper, F., et al. (2026) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2026.120119 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, S., Zhao, X., Dong, J. X., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Jin, H., Jiang, X., Chen, L., Zhang, M., Ji, L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08477-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Li, S., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhou, J., & Hua, H. (2023) · Open Medicine · doi:10.1515/med-2023-0830
JAK/STAT Signalling Overdrive in Immune Regulation: A Trigger for Autoimmunity
Cyriac, K. S., & N, H. (2024) · International journal of pharmaceutical sciences review and research · doi:10.47583/ijpsrr.2024.v84i06.005
Sommer, S. L., & Kontaridis, M. I. (2025) · Current Opinion in Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2025.100833
Interleukin-11: A pivotal player and potential therapeutic target in prostate cancer
Zhong, J., Duan, X., Wei, Z., Zhu, W., Zhao, Z., & Guohua, Z. (2026) · Current Urology · doi:10.1097/cu9.0000000000000323
The human and murine immune systems: regulated by dichotomous molecules
Silva, R. C. M. C. (2026) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2026.116329
Sozaeva, M. A., Sargsyan, A. A., Gaziev, D. M., et al. (2026) · Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research · doi:10.51847/thypbfsld9
Xiao, J., Xu, L., Li, Y., Tan, K., & Qi, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1915511
Deciphering SHP-2 conformational switching via elastic network models and transfer entropy analysis
Si, Q., & Wu, Z. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-026-06959-2
“It functions as a crucial driver of the Ras-MAPK pathway [1] while concurrently modulating other critical pathways, including JAK-STAT [2, 3] and PI3K-AKT [4], thereby collectively regulating fundamental cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and survival.”
Cellular signaling meets bacterial infection: the integrative role of STAT3
McCoy, J. R., Weinstein, K. H., Warwick, P. A., & McBride, J. W. (2026) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2026.1826683
Wu, G., Wang, C., Fang, C., & Li, J. (2026) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-026-12847-y
“Among these, phosphatases such as SHP-1 (PTPN6) and TC-PTP (PTPN2) can directly dephosphorylate JAK kinases or STAT3, and SHP-2 (PTPN11) can modulate the strength and dynamics of JAK/STAT signaling, thereby negatively regulating sig - nal transduction [29, 66, 67].”
Li, X., Duan, X., Liu, N., Tang, W., He, Y., Zhou, D., Yan, J., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · Cell Biochemistry and Function · doi:10.1002/cbf.70315
Tao, S., Yu, L., Li, J., 张振鹏, Liu, Y., Wu, J., Xia, X., Zicong, X., & Tan, Y. (2026) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2026.158878
- Authors
- Fiebelkow, J., Guendel, A., Guendel, B., Mehwald, N., Jetka, T., Komorowski, M., Waldherr, S., Schaper, F., & Dittrich, A.
- Affiliations
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) (DE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Dittrich, Anna
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Communication and Signaling
- Published
- 2021-09-16
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-94
- ISSN
- 1478-811X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8444181
- OpenAlex
- W3200950516
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell Communication and Signaling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- SHP2, PTPN11, interleukin-6, JAK/STAT signaling, STAT3 activation, signal robustness, information transmission, SOCS3, negative feedback regulation, cellular heterogeneity, single-cell analysis, information theory, MAPK activation, inflammation, signal transduction, cytokine signaling, cell-to-cell communication
- MeSH terms
- Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Protein, Animals, Cell Communication, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Inflammation, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-6, Receptors, Interleukin-6, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Cytokine Receptor gp130, Janus Kinases, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review