Cited by 131Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Vemurafenib resistance reprograms melanoma cells towards glutamine dependence

Open access
Hernandez-Davies, Jenny E, Tran, Thai Q, Reid, Michael A, Rosales, Kimberly R, Lowman, Xazmin H, Pan, Min, Moriceau, Gatien, Yang, Ying +3 more·2015·Journal of Translational Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: (V600) BRAF mutations drive approximately 50% of metastatic melanoma which can be therapeutically targeted by BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and, based on resistance mechanisms, the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi + MEKi). Although the combination therapy has been shown to provide superior clinical benefits, acquired resistance is still prevalent and limits the overall survival benefits. Recent work has shown that oncogenic changes can lead to alterations in tumor cell metabolism rendering cells addicted to nutrients, such as the amino acid glutamine. Here, we evaluated whether melanoma cells with acquired resistance display glutamine dependence and whether glutamine metabolism can be a potential molecular target to treat resistant cells. METHODS: Isogenic BRAFi sensitive parental (V600) BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines and resistant (derived by chronic treatment with vemurafenib) sub-lines were used to assess differences in the glutamine uptake and sensitivity to glutamine deprivation. To evaluate a broader range of resistance mechanisms, isogenic pairs where the sub-lines were resistant to BRAFi + MEKi were also studied. Since resistant cells demonstrated increased sensitivity to glutamine deficiency, we used glutaminase inhibitors BPTES [bis-2-(5 phenylacetamido-1, 2, 4-thiadiazol-2-yl) ethyl sulfide] and L-L-DON (6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine) to treat MAPK pathway inhibitor (MAPKi) resistant cell populations both in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We demonstrated that MAPKi-acquired resistant cells uptook greater amounts of glutamine and have increased sensitivity to glutamine deprivation than their MAPKi-sensitive counterparts. In addition, it was found that both BPTES and L-DON were more effective at decreasing cell survival of MAPKi-resistant sub-lines than parental cell populations in vitro. We also showed that mutant NRAS was critical for glutamine addiction in mutant NRAS driven resistance. When tested in vivo, we found that xenografts derived from resistant cells were more sensitive to BPTES or L-DON treatment than those derived from parental cells. CONCLUSION: Our study is a proof-of-concept for the potential of targeting glutamine metabolism as an alternative strategy to suppress acquired MAPKi-resistance in melanoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12967-015-0581-2

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeting glutamine metabolism suppresses acquired resistance to MAPK inhibitors in melanoma cells.

    “Thinking more broadly about the interplay of metabolism with RAS signaling, targeting glutamine metabolism has also been found to suppress acquired resistance to MAPK inhibitors in melanoma cells72.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernandez-Davies, J. E., Tran, T. Q., Reid, M. A., Rosales, K. R., Lowman, X. H., Pan, M., Moriceau, G., Yang, Y., Wu, J., Lo, R. S., & Kong, M.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kong, Mei
Venue
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
210-210
ISSN
1479-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1640505003
Cited by
131
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ralph M. Parsons Foundation
  • V Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Hope Center for Neurological Disorders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA183989)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
vemurafenib resistance, melanoma, glutamine addiction, glutamine metabolism, BRAF V600 mutation, MEK inhibitors, MAPK pathway inhibitors, glutaminase inhibitors, BPTES, NRAS mutation, cancer metabolism, glutamine deprivation, acquired drug resistance
MeSH terms
Vemurafenib, Animals, Enzyme Inhibitors, Glutaminase, Glutamine, Humans, Indoles, Melanoma, Membrane Proteins, Sulfonamides, Mice, SCID, Mice, Inbred NOD, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Cell Line, Tumor, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review