Cited by 481Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

UK Biobank's cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol

Open access
Petersen, Steffen E., Matthews, Paul M., Francis, Jane M., Robson, Matthew D., Zemrak, Filip, Boubertakh, Redha, Young, Alistair A., Hudson, Sarah +5 more·2016·Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: UK Biobank's ambitious aim is to perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in 100,000 people previously recruited into this prospective cohort study of half a million 40-69 year-olds. METHODS/DESIGN: We describe the CMR protocol applied in UK Biobank's pilot phase, which will be extended into the main phase with three centres using the same equipment and protocols. The CMR protocol includes white blood CMR (sagittal anatomy, coronary and transverse anatomy), cine CMR (long axis cines, short axis cines of the ventricles, coronal LVOT cine), strain CMR (tagging), flow CMR (aortic valve flow) and parametric CMR (native T1 map). DISCUSSION: This report will serve as a reference to researchers intending to use the UK Biobank resource or to replicate the UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in different settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard clinical acquisition protocols in 3D-US and CMR still have limitations in visualising the underlying anatomy due to imaging artefacts or operator-dependent errors.

    “Some of the standard clinical acquisition protocols in 3DUS and CMR still have limitations in visualising the underlying anatomy due to imaging artefacts ( e.g. cardiac motion, low slice resolution, lack of slice coverage [35]) or operatordependent errors ( e.g. shadows, signal drop-outs).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, S. E., Matthews, P. M., Francis, J. M., Robson, M. D., Zemrak, F., Boubertakh, R., Young, A. A., Hudson, S., Weale, P., Garratt, S., Collins, R., Piechnik, S., & Neubauer, S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • UK Biobank (GB)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Steffen E.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2258978862
Cited by
481
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
23.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (093707)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10005, NF-SI-0514-10022)
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/14/89/31194)
  • Imperial College London
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M024903/1, PG/14/89/31194, MC_PC_15067)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL121754)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
cardiovascular magnetic resonance, UK Biobank, aortic valve flow, T1 mapping, coronary anatomy, left ventricle, prospective cohort, cardiovascular imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Clinical Protocols, Female, United Kingdom, Heart Diseases, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biological Specimen Banks, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review