Cited by 96ECG Monitoring and AnalysisMachine Learning in HealthcareCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Cross-modal autoencoder framework learns holistic representations of cardiovascular state

Open access
Radhakrishnan, Adityanarayanan, Friedman, Sam F., Khurshid, Shaan, Ng, Kenney, Batra, Puneet, Lubitz, Steven A., Philippakis, Anthony A., Uhler, Caroline·2023·Nature Communications

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in diagnostics is integrating multiple modalities to develop a joint characterization of physiological state. Using the heart as a model system, we develop a cross-modal autoencoder framework for integrating distinct data modalities and constructing a holistic representation of cardiovascular state. In particular, we use our framework to construct such cross-modal representations from cardiac magnetic resonance images (MRIs), containing structural information, and electrocardiograms (ECGs), containing myoelectric information. We leverage the learned cross-modal representation to (1) improve phenotype prediction from a single, accessible phenotype such as ECGs; (2) enable imputation of hard-to-acquire cardiac MRIs from easy-to-acquire ECGs; and (3) develop a framework for performing genome-wide association studies in an unsupervised manner. Our results systematically integrate distinct diagnostic modalities into a common representation that better characterizes physiologic state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-38125-0

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caroline et al. developed a cross-modal analysis method that enables imputation of hard-to-acquire cardiac MRIs from easy-to-acquire ECG.

    “Caroline et al. developed a cross-modal analysis method that enables the imputation of hard-to-acquire cardiac MRIs from easy-to-acquire ECG [154].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

18 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [5]Andrew, G., Arora, R., Bilmes, J. & Livescu, K. Deep canonical correlation analysis. In International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Dasgupta, S. & McAllester, D.) (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2013).
  2. [10]Salakhutdinov R Hinton G Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks Science 2006 313 504 507 16873662
  3. [11]Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning, Vol. 1 (MIT Press, 2016).
  4. [12]Kinga, D. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv:1312.6114 (2014). · arXiv
  5. [19]Klimovskaia, A. et al. Compositional perturbation autoencoder for single-cell response modeling. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.04.14.439903 (2021).
  6. [32]Zhu, J. Y., Park, T., Isola, P. & Efros, A. A. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE, 2017).
  7. [33]Amodio, M. & Krishnaswamy, S. MAGAN: aligning biological manifolds. In International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Dy, J. & Krause, A.) (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2018).
  8. [34]Shah, S. et al. Genome-wide association and mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure. Nat. Commun.11, 1 (2020). PMC6952380 31919418
  9. [41]Frayling T A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity Science 2007 316 889 94 17434869 PMC2646098
  10. [44]Newton-Cheh C Genome-wide association study of electrocardiographic and heart rate variability traits: the Framingham heart study BMC Med. Genet. 2007 8 1 8 17903306 PMC1995612
  11. [64]Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) 8748–8763 (PMLR, 2021).
  12. [65]Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2015).
  13. [71]Ma, S. & Belkin, M. Kernel machines that adapt to GPUs for effective large batch training. In Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (eds Talwalkar, A. et al.) (2019).
  14. [73]Khurshid S Deep learning to predict cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left ventricular mass and hypertrophy from 12-lead ECGs Circulation 2021 14 e012281 34126762 PMC8217289
  15. [80]Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python. In 9th Python in Science Conference (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radhakrishnan, A., Friedman, S. F., Khurshid, S., Ng, K., Batra, P., Lubitz, S. A., Philippakis, A. A., & Uhler, C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lubitz, Steven A.
  • Philippakis, Anthony A.
  • Uhler, Caroline
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-04-28
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
2436-2436
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367318518
Cited by
82
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eric and Wendy Schmidt Center at the Broad Institute
  • American Heart Association (18SFRN34250007)
  • National Science Foundation (DMS-1651995)
  • United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1-2147)
  • Simons Foundation (Simons Investigator Award)
  • AstraZeneca, MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, electrocardiogram, multimodal data integration, phenotype prediction
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular System, Electrocardiography, Heart, Learning, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review