The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-MOG antibodies are present in a subgroup of patients with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) have been identified in a subgroup of pediatric patients with inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and in some patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The aim of this study was to examine the frequency, clinical features, and long-term disease course of patients with anti-MOG antibodies in a European cohort of NMO/NMOSD. FINDINGS: Sera from 48 patients with NMO/NMOSD and 48 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) were tested for anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and anti-MOG antibodies with a cell-based assay. Anti-MOG antibodies were found in 4/17 patients with AQP4-seronegative NMO/NMOSD, but in none of the AQP4-seropositive NMO/NMOSD (n = 31) or RR-MS patients (n = 48). MOG-seropositive patients tended towards younger disease onset with a higher percentage of patients with pediatric (<18 years) disease onset (MOG+, AQP4+, MOG-/AQP4-: 2/4, 3/31, 0/13). MOG-seropositive patients presented more often with positive oligoclonal bands (OCBs) (3/3, 5/29, 1/13) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions during disease course (2/4, 5/31, 1/13). Notably, the mean time to the second attack affecting a different CNS region was longer in the anti-MOG antibody-positive group (11.3, 3.2, 3.4 years). CONCLUSIONS: MOG-seropositive patients show a diverse clinical phenotype with clinical features resembling both NMO (attacks mainly confined to the spinal cord and optic nerves) and MS with an opticospinal presentation (positive OCBs, brain lesions). Anti-MOG antibodies can serve as a diagnostic and maybe prognostic tool in patients with an AQP4-seronegative NMO phenotype and should be tested in those patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802
Self-citationDistinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders
Sato, D. K., Callegaro, D., Lana-Peixoto, M. A., Waters, P. J., Jorge, F. M. D. H., Takahashi, T., Nakashima, I., Apostolos-Pereira, S. L., Talim, N., Simm, R. F., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000101 · Cited by 850
Kitley, J., Waters, P., Woodhall, M., Leite, M. I., Murchison, A., George, J., Küker, W., Chandratre, S., Vincent, A., & Palace, J. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5857 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Myelin in the Central Nervous System: Structure, Function, and Pathology
Stadelmann, C., Timmler, S., Barrantes-Freer, A., & Simons, M. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2018 · Cited by 728
Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease
Marignier, R., Hacohen, Y., Cobo-Calvo, A., Pröbstel, A.-K., Aktas, O., Alexopoulos, H., Amato, M.-P., Asgari, N., Banwell, B., Bennett, J., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00218-0 · Cited by 543
Self-citationin cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS), Jarius, S., Ruprecht, K., Kleiter, I., Borisow, N., Asgari, N., Pitarokoili, K., Pache, F., Stich, O., Beume, L.-A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0717-1 · Cited by 429
Jurynczyk, M., Geraldes, R., Probert, F., Woodhall, M. R., Waters, P., Tackley, G., DeLuca, G., Chandratre, S., Leite, M. I., Vincent, A., et al. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww350 · Cited by 265
Autoantibodies to MOG in a distinct subgroup of adult multiple sclerosis
Spadaro, M., Gerdes, L. A., Krumbholz, M., Ertl-Wagner, B., Thaler, F. S., Schuh, E., Metz, I., Blaschek, A., Dick, A., Brück, W., et al. (2016) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000257 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Pröbstel, A.-K., Rudolf, G., Dornmair, K., Collongues, N., Chanson, J.-B., Sanderson, N. S., Lindberg, R. L., Kappos, L., de Seze, J., & Derfuss, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroinflammation
- Published
- 2015-03-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-46
- ISSN
- 1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155551728
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-MOG antibodies are present in a subgroup of patients with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12974-015-0256-1
- The paper
- Pröbstel, A.-K., Rudolf, G., Dornmair, K., Collongues, N., Chanson, J.-B., Sanderson, N. S., Lindberg, R. L., Kappos, L., de Seze, J., & Derfuss, T. (2015). Anti-MOG antibodies are present in a subgroup of patients with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype. Journal of Neuroinflammation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0256-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.