The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct brain imaging characteristics of autoantibody-mediated CNS conditions and multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Brain imaging characteristics of MOG antibody disease are largely unknown and it is unclear whether they differ from those of multiple sclerosis and AQP4 antibody disease. The aim of this study was to identify brain imaging discriminators between those three inflammatory central nervous system diseases in adults and children to support diagnostic decisions, drive antibody testing and generate disease mechanism hypotheses. Clinical brain scans of 83 patients with brain lesions (67 in the training and 16 in the validation cohort, 65 adults and 18 children) with MOG antibody (n = 26), AQP4 antibody disease (n = 26) and multiple sclerosis (n = 31) recruited from Oxford neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis clinical services were retrospectively and anonymously scored on a set of 29 predefined magnetic resonance imaging features by two independent raters. Principal component analysis was used to perform an overview of patients without a priori knowledge of the diagnosis. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis was used to build models separating diagnostic groups and identify best classifiers, which were then tested on an independent cohort set. Adults and children with MOG antibody disease frequently had fluffy brainstem lesions, often located in pons and/or adjacent to fourth ventricle. Children across all conditions showed more frequent bilateral, large, brainstem and deep grey matter lesions. MOG antibody disease spontaneously separated from multiple sclerosis but overlapped with AQP4 antibody disease. Multiple sclerosis was discriminated from MOG antibody disease and from AQP4 antibody disease with high predictive values, while MOG antibody disease could not be accurately discriminated from AQP4 antibody disease. Best classifiers between MOG antibody disease and multiple sclerosis were similar in adults and children, and included ovoid lesions adjacent to the body of lateral ventricles, Dawson's fingers, T1 hypointense lesions (multiple sclerosis), fluffy lesions and three lesions or less (MOG antibody). In the validation cohort patients with antibody-mediated conditions were differentiated from multiple sclerosis with high accuracy. Both antibody-mediated conditions can be clearly separated from multiple sclerosis on conventional brain imaging, both in adults and children. The overlap between MOG antibody oligodendrocytopathy and AQP4 antibody astrocytopathy suggests that the primary immune target is not the main substrate for brain lesion characteristics. This is also supported by the clear distinction between multiple sclerosis and MOG antibody disease both considered primary demyelinating conditions. We identify discriminatory features, which may be useful in classifying atypical multiple sclerosis, seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and relapsing acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and characterizing cohorts for antibody discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS)
Trygg, J., & Wold, S. (2002) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.695 · Cited by 2,447
The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica
Wingerchuk, D. M., Lennon, V. A., Lucchinetti, C. F., Pittock, S. J., & Weinshenker, B. G. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70216-8 · Cited by 2,179
Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders
Sato, D. K., Callegaro, D., Lana-Peixoto, M. A., Waters, P. J., Jorge, F. M. D. H., Takahashi, T., Nakashima, I., Apostolos-Pereira, S. L., Talim, N., Simm, R. F., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000101 · Cited by 850
Linington, C., Bradl, M., Lassmann, H., Brunner, C., & Vass, K. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 708
MRI characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: An international update
Kim, H. J., Paul, F., Lana-Peixoto, M. A., Tenembaum, S., Asgari, N., Palace, J., Klawiter, E. C., Sato, D. K., de Seze, J., Wuerfel, J., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001367 · Cited by 664
Self-citationKitley, J., Waters, P., Woodhall, M., Leite, M. I., Murchison, A., George, J., Küker, W., Chandratre, S., Vincent, A., & Palace, J. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5857 · Cited by 597
Self-citationSerologic diagnosis of NMO: A multicenter comparison of aquaporin-4-IgG assays
Waters, P. J., McKeon, A., Leite, M. I., Rajasekharan, S., Lennon, V. A., Villalobos, A., Palace, J., Mandrekar, J. N., Vincent, A., Bar-Or, A., et al. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318248dec1 · Cited by 526
Self-citationMyelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in adults with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype
Kitley, J., Woodhall, M., Waters, P., Leite, M. I., Devenney, E., Craig, J., Palace, J., & Vincent, A. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31826aac4e · Cited by 445
Self-citationSelf-antigen tetramers discriminate between myelin autoantibodies to native or denatured protein
O'Connor, K. C., McLaughlin, K. A., De Jager, P. L., Chitnis, T., Bettelli, E., Xu, C., Robinson, W. H., Cherry, S. V., Bar-Or, A., Banwell, B., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1488 · Cited by 416
Brunner, C., Lassmann, H., Waehneldt, T. V., Matthieu, J., & Linington, C. (1989) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb10930.x · Cited by 409
Cited by
Banwell, B., Bennett, J. L., Marignier, R., Kim, H. J., Brilot, F., Flanagan, E. P., Ramanathan, S., Waters, P., Tenembaum, S., Graves, J. S., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00431-8 · Cited by 1,246
Self-citationMOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing
Jarius, S., Paul, F., Aktas, O., Asgari, N., Dale, R. C., de Seze, J., Franciotta, D., Fujihara, K., Jacob, A., Kim, H. J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2 · Cited by 747
Self-citationMyelin in the Central Nervous System: Structure, Function, and Pathology
Stadelmann, C., Timmler, S., Barrantes-Freer, A., & Simons, M. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2018 · Cited by 728
Ramanathan, S., Mohammad, S., Tantsis, E., Nguyen, T. K., Merheb, V., Fung, V. S. C., White, O. B., Broadley, S., Lechner-Scott, J., Vucic, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316880 · Cited by 572
Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines
Filippi, M., Preziosa, P., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Ciccarelli, O., De Stefano, N., Geurts, J. J. G., Paul, F., Reich, D. S., Toosy, A. T., et al. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz144 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurynczyk, M., Geraldes, R., Probert, F., Woodhall, M. R., Waters, P., Tackley, G., DeLuca, G., Chandratre, S., Leite, M. I., Vincent, A., & Palace, J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-24
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 617-627
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2598701066
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 22.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct brain imaging characteristics of autoantibody-mediated CNS conditions and multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/aww350
- The paper
- Jurynczyk, M., Geraldes, R., Probert, F., Woodhall, M. R., Waters, P., Tackley, G., DeLuca, G., Chandratre, S., Leite, M. I., Vincent, A., & Palace, J. (2017). Distinct brain imaging characteristics of autoantibody-mediated CNS conditions and multiple sclerosis. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.