Cited by 43melanin and skin pigmentationAnimal Behavior and ReproductionGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Intraspecific eye color variability in birds and mammals: a recent evolutionary event exclusive to humans and domestic animals

Open access
Negro, Juan J., Carmen Blázquez, M., Galván, Ismael·2017·Frontiers in Zoology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human populations and breeds of domestic animals are composed of individuals with a multiplicity of eye (= iris) colorations. Some wild birds and mammals may have intraspecific eye color variability, but this variation seems to be due to the developmental stage of the individual, its breeding status, and/or sexual dimorphism. In other words, eye colour tends to be a species-specific trait in wild animals, and the exceptions are species in which individuals of the same age group or gender all develop the same eye colour. Domestic animals, by definition, include bird and mammal species artificially selected by humans in the last few thousand years. Humans themselves may have acquired a diverse palette of eye colors, likewise in recent evolutionary time, in the Mesolithic or in the Upper Paleolithic. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: We posit two previously unrecognized hypotheses regarding eye color variation: 1) eye coloration in wild animals of every species tends to be a fixed trait. 2) Humans and domestic animal populations, on the contrary, have eyes of multiple colors. Sexual selection has been invoked for eye color variation in humans, but this selection mode does not easily apply in domestic animals, where matings are controlled by the human breeder. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: Eye coloration is polygenic in humans. We wish to investigate the genetics of eye color in other animals, as well as the ecological correlates. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: Investigating the origin and function of eye colors will shed light on the reason why some species may have either light-colored irises (e.g., white, yellow or light blue) or dark ones (dark red, brown or black). The causes behind the vast array of eye colors across taxa have never been thoroughly investigated, but it may well be that all Darwinian selection processes are at work: sexual selection in humans, artificial selection for domestic animals, and natural selection (mainly) for wild animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12983-017-0243-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Iris colour variation is largely driven by domestication and self-domestication.

    “suggesting that iris colour variation is largely driven by domestication and self-domestication [53].”

    From Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Presentation of the hypothesis and Implications of the hypothesis (pages unavailable) link iris-colour diversity in domestic animals to artificial selection, but present this as a hypothesis rather than an established driver. For humans, the paper proposes sexual selection; it does not identify self-domestication as a driver. Thus the claim overstates the proposed explanation and adds a mechanism the paper does not support. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Worthy M. Animal eye colors: Authors Choice Press; 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Negro, J. J., Carmen Blázquez, M., & Galván, I.
Affiliations
Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES)
Corresponding author
Negro, Juan J.
Venue
Frontiers in Zoology
Published
2017-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
53-53
ISSN
1742-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773002681
Cited by
42
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • MINECO (RYC-2012-10237, CGL2015-67796-P)
  • CONACYT (grant #454959)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
eye color, iris color, intraspecific color variation, domestic animals, wild birds, wild mammals, selective breeding, sexual selection, natural selection, polygenic traits, eye color genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review