Cited by 192Genetic Associations and Epidemiologymelanin and skin pigmentationGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Digital Quantification of Human Eye Color Highlights Genetic Association of Three New Loci

Open access
Liu, Fan, Wollstein, Andreas, Hysi, Pirro G., Ankra-Badu, Georgina A., Spector, Timothy D., Park, Daniel, Zhu, Gu, Larsson, Mats +12 more·2010·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Previous studies have successfully identified genetic variants in several genes associated with human iris (eye) color; however, they all used simplified categorical trait information. Here, we quantified continuous eye color variation into hue and saturation values using high-resolution digital full-eye photographs and conducted a genome-wide association study on 5,951 Dutch Europeans from the Rotterdam Study. Three new regions, 1q42.3, 17q25.3, and 21q22.13, were highlighted meeting the criterion for genome-wide statistically significant association. The latter two loci were replicated in 2,261 individuals from the UK and in 1,282 from Australia. The LYST gene at 1q42.3 and the DSCR9 gene at 21q22.13 serve as promising functional candidates. A model for predicting quantitative eye colors explained over 50% of trait variance in the Rotterdam Study. Over all our data exemplify that fine phenotyping is a useful strategy for finding genes involved in human complex traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000934

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, F., Wollstein, A., Hysi, P. G., Ankra-Badu, G. A., Spector, T. D., Park, D., Zhu, G., Larsson, M., Duffy, D. L., Montgomery, G. W., Mackey, D. A., Walsh, S., Lao, O., Hofman, A., Rivadeneira, F., Vingerling, J. R., Uitterlinden, A. G., Martin, N. G., Hammond, C. J., & Kayser, M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Lions Eye Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Kayser, Manfred
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e1000934
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2045107415
Cited by
191
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • Wellcome Trust (01254, 201865, 201413, HEALTH-F4-2007-201413)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • European Commission (QLG2-CT-2002-01254, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, 201413, 201865, 01254, 014-93-015)
  • ZonMw (050-060-810)
  • Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (050.060.810, FP7 2007-2013, 014-93-015, 911-03-012, 175.010.2005.011)
  • Oogfonds
  • Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter voorkoming van Blindheid
  • Heidelberg Engineering
  • Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek
  • National Institutes of Health (389875, QLG2-CT-2002-01254)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (G20234)
  • Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
  • Australian Research Council (DP0343921)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (A7960034, 496739, 443036, A79906588, 389927, 389891, 552485, DP0212016, 552498, 442981, 389938, 241944, 339462, 442915, 389875, A79801419, 389892)
  • Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY018246)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA088363)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
iris color, eye color, genome-wide association study, LYST, complex traits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Eye Color, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Cohort Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review