Cited by 126Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and EducationPublic health and occupational medicine

Civil society: the catalyst for ensuring health in the age of sustainable development

Open access
Smith, Julia, Buse, Kent, Gordon, Case·2016·Globalization and Health

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goal Three is rightly ambitious, but achieving it will require doing global health differently. Among other things, progressive civil society organisations will need to be recognised and supported as vital partners in achieving the necessary transformations. We argue, using illustrative examples, that a robust civil society can fulfill eight essential global health functions. These include producing compelling moral arguments for action, building coalitions beyond the health sector, introducing novel policy alternatives, enhancing the legitimacy of global health initiatives and institutions, strengthening systems for health, enhancing accountability systems, mitigating the commercial determinants of health and ensuring rights-based approaches. Given that civil society activism has catalyzed tremendous progress in global health, there is a need to invest in and support it as a global public good to ensure that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development can be realised.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12992-016-0178-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LMIC-based advocates may not feel able to advocate for structural changes, given the continual pressure to obtain scarce funding from international donors.

    “Our study is important as LMIC-based advocates may not feel able to advocate for such changes, given the continual pressure to obtain scarce funding from international donors.54 57 58”

    From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Conclusion says civil society organisations face decreased resources and restrictions on their ability to act as advocates. It does not say that LMIC-based advocates feel unable to press for structural changes because of pressure to secure funding from international donors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By not limiting themselves to public health alliances, tobacco control advocates successfully built coalitions beyond the health sector.

    “By not limiting themselves to public health alliances, tobacco control advocates successfully built coalitions beyond the health sector (Smith, Buse, & Gordon, 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [17]Bartsch S. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. In: HeinW, Bartsch S, Kohlmorgen L, editors. Global health governance and the fight against HIV/AIDS. Cambridge: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 5.
  2. [20]Cohen C. Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Whittier Law Rev. 1999;95:1–20.
  3. [22]SEND West Africa West Africa against Ebola campaign Ghana chapter calls for support 2015
  4. [25]Hunt P. SDGs and the Importance of Formal Independent Review: An Opportunity for Health to Lead the Way. Health Hum Rights. 2015. www.hhrjournal.org/2015/09/sdg-series-sdgs-and-the-importance-of-formal-independent-review-an-opportunity-for-health-to-lead-the-way/. Accessed 02 Mar 2016.
  5. [34]Hawkes S, Buse K. Searching for the Right to Health in the Sustainable Development Agenda. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016. http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3166_0.html. Accessed 02 Mar 2016. PMC4852005 27239885
  6. [38]Lee, K. Civil Society Organisations and the Functions of Global Health Governance: What Role within Intergovernmental Organisations? Glob Health Gov. 2010;3:1–20. PMC4888897 27274776

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J., Buse, K., & Gordon, C.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (CH)
Corresponding author
Smith, Julia
Venue
Globalization and Health
Published
2016-07-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
40-40
ISSN
1744-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2471564892
Cited by
124
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Globalization and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01-CA091021)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public health and occupational medicine
Keywords
civil society, global health, Sustainable Development Goal 3, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, civil society organizations, global health partnerships, health system strengthening, accountability, commercial determinants of health, rights-based approach, global public goods
MeSH terms
Civil Rights, Conservation of Natural Resources, Community Participation, Health, Health Policy, Humans, Social Responsibility, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review