Cited by 29Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

A health partnership to reduce neonatal mortality in four hospitals in Rwanda

Open access
Ntigurirwa, Placide, Mellor, Kathy, Langer, Daniel, Evans, Mari, Robertson, Emily, Tuyisenge, Lisine, Groves, Alan, Lissauer, Tom·2017·Globalization and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A health partnership to improve hospital based neonatal care in Rwanda to reduce neonatal mortality was requested by the Rwandan Ministry of Health. Although many health system improvements have been made, there is a severe shortage of health professionals with neonatal training. METHODS: Following a needs assessment, a health partnership grant for 2 years was obtained. A team of volunteer neonatologists and paediatricians, neonatal nurses, lactation consultants and technicians with experience in Rwanda or low-income countries was assembled. A neonatal training program was provided in four hospitals (the 2 University hospitals and 2 district hospitals), which focused on nutrition, provision of basic respiratory support with nasal CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), enhanced record keeping, thermoregulation, vital signs monitoring and infection control. To identify if care delivery improved, audits of nutritional support, CPAP use and its complications, and documentation in newly developed neonatal medical records were conducted. Mortality data of neonatal admissions was obtained. RESULTS: Intensive neonatal training was provided on 27 short-term visits by 10 specialist health professionals. In addition, a paediatric doctor spent 3 months and two spent 6 months each providing training. A total of 472 training days was conducted in the neonatal units. For nutritional support, significant improvements were demonstrated in reduction in time to initiation of enteral feeds and to achieve full milk feeds, in reduction in maximum postnatal weight loss, but not in days for regaining birth weight. Respiratory support with bubble CPAP was applied to 365 infants in the first 18 months. There were no significant technical problems, but tissue damage, usually transient, to the nose and face was recorded in 13%. New medical records improved documentation by doctors, but nursing staff were reluctant to use them. Mortality for University teaching hospital admissions was reduced from 23.6% in the 18 months before the project to 21.7%. For the two district hospitals, mortality reduced from 10% to 8.1%. A major barrier to training and improved care was low number of nurses working on neonatal units and staff turnover. CONCLUSION: This health partnership delivered an intensive program of capacity building by volunteer specialists. Improved care and documentation were demonstrated. CPAP was successfully introduced. Mortality was reduced. This format can be adapted for further training and improvement programs to improve the quality of facility-based care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12992-017-0252-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ntigurirwa, P., Mellor, K., Langer, D., Evans, M., Robertson, E., Tuyisenge, L., Groves, A., & Lissauer, T.
Affiliations
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (RW)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Lissauer, Tom
Venue
Globalization and Health
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
28-28
ISSN
1744-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620911639
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Globalization and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Department for International Development, UK Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
neonatal mortality, neonatal care, capacity building, health partnerships, continuous positive airway pressure, bubble CPAP, neonatal nutrition, enteral nutrition, postnatal weight loss, infection control, thermoregulation, employee turnover, Rwanda
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Education, Medical, Female, Health Workforce, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Male, Physicians, Rwanda, Healthcare Disparities, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review