Cited by 6scientometrics and bibliometrics researchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDiverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies

Research on Artificial Intelligence, Machine and Deep Learning in Medicine: Global Characteristics, Readiness, and Equity

Open access
Klingelhöfer, Doris, Braun, Markus, Dröge, Janis, Groneberg, David A., Brüggmann, Dörthe·2025·Globalization and Health

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) will have a lasting and drastic impact on medical research and healthcare. In addition to the benefits, the associated risks are also the subject of controversial debate and there are fears of serious consequences. There is an urgent need for action, which must be underpinned by scientific information. Methods: By analyzing temporal and geographic patterns, including national readiness for access to AI, we therefore identified incentives and barriers to global research under socioeconomic conditions. Results: The explosive increase in annual publications started in 2017. The main players in AI med research were the USA, China, the UK, Germany, and South Korea. There was a significant correlation between the publication output on AI in medicine (AI med) and the metrics for economy and innovation. Additionally, citation patterns show the disadvantage of the Global South compared to the North American and European countries. In several weaker economies: Jordan, Pakistan, Egypt, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia, a more positive position was found in relation to the number of articles suggesting a better ranking in AI med research in the future. Conclusion: The results show the need for advanced global networking to ensure all relevant aspects for equitable development and the beneficial use of AI med without promoting racial or regional inequities and to enforce this not only in the AI systems of economically strong countries but also for the participation of economically weaker countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12992-025-01128-1

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Jariwala M. Strategic innovations: artificial intelligence’s role in portfolio, program, and project risk management. Int J Comput Appl. 2025;186(61):8–16.
  2. [18]Siafakas N, Vasarmidi E. Risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. Pneumonia. 2024;37(3):40.
  3. [41]Lighthill J. Artificial Intelligence: A General Survey, Artificial Intelligence: A paper symposium, Science Research Council. 1973.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klingelhöfer, D., Braun, M., Dröge, J., Groneberg, D. A., & Brüggmann, D.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Klingelhöfer, Doris
Venue
Globalization and Health
Published
2025-06-08
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
36-36
ISSN
1744-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411126638
Cited by
6
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Globalization and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, Global South, publication trends, citation patterns, innovation indicators
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Global Health, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review