The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant disease identification using explainable 3D deep learning on hyperspectral images
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperspectral imaging is emerging as a promising approach for plant disease identification. The large and possibly redundant information contained in hyperspectral data cubes makes deep learning based identification of plant diseases a natural fit. Here, we deploy a novel 3D deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) that directly assimilates the hyperspectral data. Furthermore, we interrogate the learnt model to produce physiologically meaningful explanations. We focus on an economically important disease, charcoal rot, which is a soil borne fungal disease that affects the yield of soybean crops worldwide. RESULTS: Based on hyperspectral imaging of inoculated and mock-inoculated stem images, our 3D DCNN has a classification accuracy of 95.73% and an infected class F1 score of 0.87. Using the concept of a saliency map, we visualize the most sensitive pixel locations, and show that the spatial regions with visible disease symptoms are overwhelmingly chosen by the model for classification. We also find that the most sensitive wavelengths used by the model for classification are in the near infrared region (NIR), which is also the commonly used spectral range for determining the vegetative health of a plant. CONCLUSION: The use of an explainable deep learning model not only provides high accuracy, but also provides physiological insight into model predictions, thus generating confidence in model predictions. These explained predictions lend themselves for eventual use in precision agriculture and research application using automated phenotyping platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.08695 · Cited by 11,822
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
Chen, Y., Jiang, H., Li, C., Jia, X., & Ghamisi, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2016.2584107 · Cited by 2,984
Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks
Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 · Cited by 2,665
Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks
Waibel, A., Hanazawa, T., Hinton, G., Shikano, K., & Lang, K. J. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.21701 · Cited by 2,643
Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery with 3D Convolutional Neural Network
Li, Y., Zhang, H., & Shen, Q. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9010067 · Cited by 1,320
Knipling, E. B. (1970) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(70)80021-9 · Cited by 1,314
Cited by
Convolutional Neural Networks for Image-Based High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review
Jiang, Y., & Li, C. (2020) · Plant Phenomics · doi:10.34133/2020/4152816 · Cited by 380
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100452 · Cited by 291
Early Detection of Plant Viral Disease Using Hyperspectral Imaging and Deep Learning
Nguyen, C., Sagan, V., Maimaitiyiming, M., Maimaitijiang, M., Bhadra, S., & Kwasniewski, M. T. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21030742 · Cited by 281
Toward Sustainability: Trade-Off Between Data Quality and Quantity in Crop Pest Recognition
Li, Y., & Chao, X. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.811241 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagasubramanian, K., Jones, S., Singh, A. K., Sarkar, S., Singh, A., & Ganapathysubramanian, B.
- Venue
- Plant Methods
- Published
- 2019-08-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-98
- ISSN
- 1746-4811 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969933026
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant disease identification using explainable 3D deep learning on hyperspectral images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13007-019-0479-8
- The paper
- Nagasubramanian, K., Jones, S., Singh, A. K., Sarkar, S., Singh, A., & Ganapathysubramanian, B. (2019). Plant disease identification using explainable 3D deep learning on hyperspectral images. Plant Methods. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0479-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.