Cited by 98Health Policy Implementation ScienceHepatitis C virus researchClinical practice guidelines implementation

The association between implementation strategy use and the uptake of hepatitis C treatment in a national sample

Open access
Rogal, Shari S., Yakovchenko, Vera, Waltz, Thomas J., Powell, Byron J., Kirchner, JoAnn E., Proctor, Enola K., Gonzalez, Rachel, Park, Angela +4 more·2017·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common and highly morbid illness. New medications that have much higher cure rates have become the new evidence-based practice in the field. Understanding the implementation of these new medications nationally provides an opportunity to advance the understanding of the role of implementation strategies in clinical outcomes on a large scale. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study defined discrete implementation strategies and clustered these strategies into groups. The present evaluation assessed the use of these strategies and clusters in the context of HCV treatment across the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans Health Administration, the largest provider of HCV care nationally. METHODS: A 73-item survey was developed and sent to all VA sites treating HCV via electronic survey, to assess whether or not a site used each ERIC-defined implementation strategy related to employing the new HCV medication in 2014. VA national data regarding the number of Veterans starting on the new HCV medications at each site were collected. The associations between treatment starts and number and type of implementation strategies were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 80 (62%) sites responded. Respondents endorsed an average of 25 ± 14 strategies. The number of treatment starts was positively correlated with the total number of strategies endorsed (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). Quartile of treatment starts was significantly associated with the number of strategies endorsed (p < 0.01), with the top quartile endorsing a median of 33 strategies, compared to 15 strategies in the lowest quartile. There were significant differences in the types of strategies endorsed by sites in the highest and lowest quartiles of treatment starts. Four of the 10 top strategies for sites in the top quartile had significant correlations with treatment starts compared to only 1 of the 10 top strategies in the bottom quartile sites. Overall, only 3 of the top 15 most frequently used strategies were associated with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sites that used a greater number of implementation strategies were able to deliver more evidence-based treatment in HCV. The current assessment also demonstrates the feasibility of electronic self-reporting to evaluate ERIC strategies on a large scale. These results provide initial evidence for the clinical relevance of the ERIC strategies in a real-world implementation setting on a large scale. This is an initial step in identifying which strategies are associated with the uptake of evidence-based practices in nationwide healthcare systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-017-0588-6

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogal, S. S., Yakovchenko, V., Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Kirchner, J. E., Proctor, E. K., Gonzalez, R., Park, A., Ross, D., Morgan, T. R., Chartier, M., & Chinman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Rogal, Shari S.
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2017-05-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612299727
Cited by
98
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
HIV, Hepatitis and Related Conditions Programs in the Office of Specialty Care Services of VHA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
hepatitis C, implementation strategies, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, evidence-based practice uptake, veterans, Veterans Health Administration, implementation evaluation, treatment initiation
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Antiviral Agents, Female, Hepatitis C, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review