The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial coating of implants in orthopaedics and trauma: a classification proposal in an evolving panorama
Open accessAbstract
Implanted biomaterials play a key role in current success of orthopedic and trauma surgery. However, implant-related infections remain among the leading reasons for failure with high economical and social associated costs. According to the current knowledge, probably the most critical pathogenic event in the development of implant-related infection is biofilm formation, which starts immediately after bacterial adhesion on an implant and effectively protects the microorganisms from the immune system and systemic antibiotics. A rationale, modern prevention of biomaterial-associated infections should then specifically focus on inhibition of both bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Nonetheless, currently available prophylactic measures, although partially effective in reducing surgical site infections, are not based on the pathogenesis of biofilm-related infections and unacceptable high rates of septic complications, especially in high-risk patients and procedures, are still reported.In the last decade, several studies have investigated the ability of implant surface modifications to minimize bacterial adhesion, inhibit biofilm formation, and provide effective bacterial killing to protect implanted biomaterials, even if there still is a great discrepancy between proposed and clinically implemented strategies and a lack of a common language to evaluate them.To move a step forward towards a more systematic approach in this promising but complicated field, here we provide a detailed overview and an original classification of the various technologies under study or already in the market. We may distinguish the following: 1. Passive surface finishing/modification (PSM): passive coatings that do not release bactericidal agents to the surrounding tissues, but are aimed at preventing or reducing bacterial adhesion through surface chemistry and/or structure modifications; 2. Active surface finishing/modification (ASM): active coatings that feature pharmacologically active pre-incorporated bactericidal agents; and 3. Local carriers or coatings (LCC): local antibacterial carriers or coatings, biodegradable or not, applied at the time of the surgical procedure, immediately prior or at the same time of the implant and around it. Classifying different technologies may be useful in order to better compare different solutions, to improve the design of validation tests and, hopefully, to improve and speed up the regulatory process in this rapidly evolving field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138 · cited 1×
“On the host side, the detailed process of implant osteo and tissue integration is also incompletely unveiled [31, 32].”
Background(2013) · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02433-7 · Cited by 5,127
Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications
Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J., & Turner, R. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3028 · Cited by 2,746
Silver as Antibacterial Agent: Ion, Nanoparticle, and Metal
Chernousova, S., & Epple, M. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201205923 · Cited by 2,264
Economic Burden of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the United States
Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Watson, H., Schmier, J. K., & Parvizi, J. (2012) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022 · Cited by 1,702
Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface
Grass, G., Rensing, C., & Solioz, M. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02766-10 · Cited by 1,640
Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus
Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A., Ganesh, V. K., & Höök, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3161 · Cited by 1,533
Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance
Pelgrift, R. Y., & Friedman, A. J. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.011 · Cited by 1,432
A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces
Campoccia, D., Montanaro, L., & Arciola, C. R. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.089 · Cited by 1,358
Metadata
- Authors
- Romanò, C. L., Scarponi, S., Gallazzi, E., Romanò, D., & Drago, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-157
- ISSN
- 1749-799X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1947538072
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial coating of implants in orthopaedics and trauma: a classification proposal in an evolving panorama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13018-015-0294-5
- The paper
- Romanò, C. L., Scarponi, S., Gallazzi, E., Romanò, D., & Drago, L. (2015). Antibacterial coating of implants in orthopaedics and trauma: a classification proposal in an evolving panorama. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0294-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.