Cited by 28Genomics and Rare DiseasesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Opportunities for developing therapies for rare genetic diseases: focus on gain-of-function and allostery

Open access
Chen, Binbin, Altman, Russ B.·2017·Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in next generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized our ability to discover the causes of rare genetic diseases. However, developing treatments for these diseases remains challenging. In fact, when we systematically analyze the US FDA orphan drug list, we find that only 8% of rare diseases have an FDA-designated drug. Our approach leverages three primary insights: first, diseases with gain-of-function mutations and late onset are more likely to have drug options; second, drugs are more often inhibitors than activators; and third, some disease-causing proteins can be rescued by allosteric activators in diseases due to loss-of-function mutations. RESULTS: We have developed a pipeline that combines natural language processing and human curation to mine promising targets for drug development from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. This pipeline targets diseases caused by well-characterized gain-of-function mutations or loss-of-function proteins with known allosteric activators. Applying this pipeline across thousands of rare genetic diseases, we discover 34 rare genetic diseases that are promising candidates for drug development. CONCLUSION: Our analysis has revealed uneven coverage of rare diseases in the current US FDA orphan drug space. Diseases with gain-of-function mutations or loss-of-function mutations and known allosteric activators should be prioritized for drug treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13023-017-0614-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of GARDs have shown a close link to specific genetic abnormalities, where mutant or misfolded proteins are expressed and lead to disease symptoms.

    “A number of genetic and rare diseases (GARDs) have shown their close link to specific genetic abnormalities, where mutant or misfolded proteins are expressed as a result and lead to disease symptoms.[1]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Truhlar DG, Howe WJ, Hopfinger AJ, Blaney J, Dammkoehler RE. Rational Drug Design, vol. 108. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, B., & Altman, R. B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Altman, Russ B.
Venue
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
61-61
ISSN
1750-1172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2597836507
Cited by
28
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 GM 7365-40)
  • Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans
  • Stanford University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
rare genetic disorders, orphan drugs, drug discovery targets, gain-of-function mutations, loss-of-function mutations, allosteric activators, allosteric inhibitors, late-onset disease, natural language processing, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Humans, Orphan Drug Production, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Rare Diseases, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review