Cited by 149Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Emergence of orphan drugs in the United States: a quantitative assessment of the first 25 years

Braun, M. Miles, Farag-El-Massah, Sheiren, Xu, Kui, Coté, Timothy R.·2010·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

The 1983 US Orphan Drug Act has stimulated the development of new therapies for rare diseases. To provide the first comprehensive overview of orphan-designated products and their indications, this article quantitatively analyses the characteristics and distribution of orphan designations and approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration from 1983 to August 2008. Of the 1,892 orphan-designated products, 326 received marketing approval, representing 247 different drugs and more than 200 different diseases. About half of the approvals had occurred by 4 years after designation was granted. The most common patient population size for orphan designations and approvals was fewer than 10,000 patients, and cancer was the most common disease area. The implications of such findings for future development and marketing of therapies for rare diseases are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd3160

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drug discovery for neuropsychiatric diseases could involve developing a catalogue of drugs targeting a variety of orphan diseases.

    “Hence, drug discovery for neuropsychiatric diseases could involve developing a catalogue of drugs targeting a variety of orphan diseases (Braun et al., 2010).”

    From CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics (2012) · cites this paper as Braun et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braun, M. M., Farag-El-Massah, S., Xu, K., & Coté, T. R.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Coté, Timothy R.
ORCID
Xu, Kui
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2010-06-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
519-522
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2024559544
Cited by
148
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
42.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
orphan drugs, rare diseases, Orphan Drug Act, orphan drug designation, drug approval, FDA, drug development incentives, cancer
MeSH terms
Humans, Orphan Drug Production, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review