Cited by 179Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

The Friendship Bench programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders delivered by lay health workers in Zimbabwe

Open access
Chibanda, Dixon, Bowers, Tarryn, Verhey, Ruth, Rusakaniko, Simbarashe, Abas, Melanie, Weiss, Helen A, Araya, Ricardo·2015·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders (CMD) are a leading cause of disability globally. Emerging evidence indicates that in low and middle income countries the treatment gap for CMD can be addressed through the use of trained and supervised lay health workers (LHWs). Few clinical trials have evaluated the use of such task-shifting approaches in sub-Saharan Africa. In Zimbabwe, we have successfully piloted a task-shifting intervention delivered by LHWs. This protocol describes a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS: Each of 24 randomly selected clinics from a pool of 42 in Harare will recruit 24 participants (N = 576). The clinics are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the intervention package [a problem solving therapy package delivered over a 4-6 week period by LHWs (N = 24) followed by a 6-week group support programme which focuses mainly on teaching a craft skill] or enhanced usual care, which includes usual care and psycho-education. Primary care attenders aged 18 years and above who score positive on a locally validated CMD screening questionnaire (Shona Symptom Questionnaire, SSQ-14) will be eligible for recruitment and asked for informed consent to participate in the trial. The primary measure is the SSQ score at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This effectiveness trial using LHWs to address the treatment gap for CMD will contribute to the body of knowledge on the feasibility and ability for scale-up of interventions for CMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR201410000876178.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-015-0013-y

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]World Health Organization. mhGAP Mental Health Gap Action Programme: scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. Geneva; 2008. http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap_final_english.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2014. 26290926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chibanda, D., Bowers, T., Verhey, R., Rusakaniko, S., Abas, M., Weiss, H. A., & Araya, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Chibanda, Dixon
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2015-05-23
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1560790411
Cited by
179
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Grand Challenges Canada
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K012126/1)
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW010540)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
common mental disorders, lay health workers, task shifting, problem-solving therapy, brief psychological intervention, treatment gap, primary care, Zimbabwe, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review