CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsAdvanced Glycation End Products researchLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HMGB1 knockdown increases MM cell vulnerability by regulating autophagy and DNA damage repair

Open access
Guo, Xing, He, Donghua, Zhang, Enfan, Chen, Jing, Chen, Qingxiao, Li, Yi, Yang, Li, Yang, Yang, Zhao, Yi, Wang, Gang, He, Jingsong, Cai, Zhen·2018·Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
DOI 10.1186/s13046-018-0883-3PMC PMC6114506
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the development of novel therapeutic agents, the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has much improved. However, the disease is incurable due to drug resistance. Previous studies have found that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is involved in inflammation, angiogenesis, DNA damage repair, and cancer invasion, progression, metastasis and drug resistance and that high HMGB1 expression is associated with poor MM prognosis, yet the role and mechanism of HMGB1 in MM remains unclear. METHODS: Through gene expression and Oncomine database analyses, we found that HMGB1 is associated with a poor prognosis in MM patients. RNA interference together with gene array analysis, cell proliferation and apoptosis assays, autophagy detection assays, western blotting, and in vivo xenograft models were employed to evaluate the effect of HMGB1 and the mechanism involved in MM drug resistance. RESULTS: MM cell lines and primary MM samples were found to express high levels of HMGB1, which was negatively associated with the 3-year survival of MM patients. HMGB1 knockdown in MM cells enhanced the inhibitory effect of chemotherapy with dexamethasone (Dex) via apoptosis induction. Furthermore, downregulation of HMGB1 activated the mTOR pathway, inhibited autophagy and increased DNA damage induced by Dex by modulating expression of related genes. In vivo, xenograft models showed that after Dex treatment, the tumor burden of HMGB1-knockdown mice was decreased compared with that of control mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our research shows that HMGB1 participates in autophagy and DNA damage repair and that downregulation of HMGB1 enhances the sensitivity of MM cells to Dex, suggesting that HMGB1 may serve as a target for MM treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13046-018-0883-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Expression of HMGB1 in MM cells. a, b: qRT-PCR (a) and western blotting (b) results of HMGB1 expression in MM cell lines; c: qRT-PCR results of HMGB1 expression in primary MM cells (cells from the bone marrow of MM patients sorted by CD138 antibody beads); d: Expression of HMGB1 in the bone marrow tissue of MM patients, as evaluated by immunofluorescence; e: HMGB1 expression was negatively associated with MM patient 3-year survival according to the analysis of the Oncomine database (*p < 0.05)
Fig. 1 Expression of HMGB1 in MM cells. a, b: qRT-PCR (a) and western blotting (b) results of HMGB1 expression in MM cell lines; c: qRT-PCR results of HMGB1 expression in primary MM cells (cells from the bone marrow of MM patients sorted by CD138 antibody beads); d: Expression of HMGB1 in the bone marrow tissue of MM patients, as evaluated by immunofluorescence; e: HMGB1 expression was negatively associated with MM patient 3-year survival according to the analysis of the Oncomine database (*p < 0.05)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 HMGB1 knockdown enhanced the inhibitory effect of chemotherapy in MM cells. a: MM cells (RPMI8226, CAG, MM.1S) were transfected with HMGB1 knockdown lentivirus, and the transfection effect was observed with a fluorescence microscope; b, c, d: qRT-PCR (b), western blot and densitometric analysis of the western blot results (c) were used to verify HMGB1 knockdown effect (n = 3); d: The CCK8 assay was used to determine the proliferation of MM cells after HMGB1 knockdown (n = 3, p > 0.05); e: The CCK8 assay was used to analyze the inhibitory effect of Dex after HMGB1 knockdown (n = 3, P>0.05) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)
Fig. 2 HMGB1 knockdown enhanced the inhibitory effect of chemotherapy in MM cells. a: MM cells (RPMI8226, CAG, MM.1S) were transfected with HMGB1 knockdown lentivirus, and the transfection effect was observed with a fluorescence microscope; b, c, d: qRT-PCR (b), western blot and densitometric analysis of the western blot results (c) were used to verify HMGB1 knockdown effect (n = 3); d: The CCK8 assay was used to determine the proliferation of MM cells after HMGB1 knockdown (n = 3, p > 0.05); e: The CCK8 assay was used to analyze the inhibitory effect of Dex after HMGB1 knockdown (n = 3, P>0.05) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 HMGB1 knockdown increased Dex-induced MM cell apoptosis. a: RPMI8226 and CAG were treated with Dex for 48 h, and cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry (n = 3, p > 0.05); b: Representative flow cytometry results showing RPMI 82286 (transfected with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis after treatment with Dex (100 μM) for 48 h; c: Histograms showing the results of the analysis of cell apoptosis induced by Dex (n = 3); d: Western blotting was performed to detect the expression of c-caspase-3 and c-PARP induced by Dex after HMGB1 knockdown; e: Histograms showing the densitometric analysis of the 15 KD fragment of c-caspase-3 (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)
Fig. 3 HMGB1 knockdown increased Dex-induced MM cell apoptosis. a: RPMI8226 and CAG were treated with Dex for 48 h, and cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry (n = 3, p > 0.05); b: Representative flow cytometry results showing RPMI 82286 (transfected with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis after treatment with Dex (100 μM) for 48 h; c: Histograms showing the results of the analysis of cell apoptosis induced by Dex (n = 3); d: Western blotting was performed to detect the expression of c-caspase-3 and c-PARP induced by Dex after HMGB1 knockdown; e: Histograms showing the densitometric analysis of the 15 KD fragment of c-caspase-3 (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Changes of MM survival and apoptosis related genes after HMGB1 knockdown. a: Heatmap of the Affymetrix HTA 2.0 array results in RPMI8226 and CAG cells showing that the DEPTOR, Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Mcl1 levels were decreased; b, c,: qRT-PCR (B) and western blotting (c) were used to verify the array results; d: Densitometric analysis of the protein levels of DEPTOR, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xl (n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4 Changes of MM survival and apoptosis related genes after HMGB1 knockdown. a: Heatmap of the Affymetrix HTA 2.0 array results in RPMI8226 and CAG cells showing that the DEPTOR, Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Mcl1 levels were decreased; b, c,: qRT-PCR (B) and western blotting (c) were used to verify the array results; d: Densitometric analysis of the protein levels of DEPTOR, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xl (n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 mTOR pathway was activated, autophagy was inhibited after HMGB1 knockdown and the enhanced sensitivity effect of HMGB1 knockdown was blocked by CQ (an autophagy inhibitor). a: Western blotting was performed to analyze changes in the mTOR pathway after HMGB1 knockdown; the phosphorylation of p70S6K (substrate of the mTORC1 complex) and AKT-ser473 (substrate of the mTORC2 complex) were both increased; b: Densitometric analysis of the phosphorylation of mTOR, p70S6K and AKT; c: Representative results showing the fluorescence intensities in RPMI8226 after Dex (100 μM) exposure using the Cyto-ID Autophagy Detection Kit with flow cytometry, control shRNA without Dex (red line), HMGB1 shRNA without Dex (blue line), control shRNA with Dex (orange line), and HMGB1 shRNA with Dex (green line); d: Histograms showing the analysis results of the MM cell lines(RPMI8226, CAG) autophagy fluorescence intensities induced by Dex after HMGB1 knockdow by Cyto-ID Autophagy Detection Kit n (n = 3); e: Western blotting was performed to detect the Dex-induced expression of LC3A/B-I/II after HMGB1 knockdown and the histograms showing the densitometric analysis of LC3A/B-II; f: Histograms showing the analysis results of RPMI8226 (transfection with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis induced by Dex (100 μM) in the presence of CQ (1 μM, an autophagy inhibitor) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)
Fig. 5 mTOR pathway was activated, autophagy was inhibited after HMGB1 knockdown and the enhanced sensitivity effect of HMGB1 knockdown was blocked by CQ (an autophagy inhibitor). a: Western blotting was performed to analyze changes in the mTOR pathway after HMGB1 knockdown; the phosphorylation of p70S6K (substrate of the mTORC1 complex) and AKT-ser473 (substrate of the mTORC2 complex) were both increased; b: Densitometric analysis of the phosphorylation of mTOR, p70S6K and AKT; c: Representative results showing the fluorescence intensities in RPMI8226 after Dex (100 μM) exposure using the Cyto-ID Autophagy Detection Kit with flow cytometry, control shRNA without Dex (red line), HMGB1 shRNA without Dex (blue line), control shRNA with Dex (orange line), and HMGB1 shRNA with Dex (green line); d: Histograms showing the analysis results of the MM cell lines(RPMI8226, CAG) autophagy fluorescence intensities induced by Dex after HMGB1 knockdow by Cyto-ID Autophagy Detection Kit n (n = 3); e: Western blotting was performed to detect the Dex-induced expression of LC3A/B-I/II after HMGB1 knockdown and the histograms showing the densitometric analysis of LC3A/B-II; f: Histograms showing the analysis results of RPMI8226 (transfection with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis induced by Dex (100 μM) in the presence of CQ (1 μM, an autophagy inhibitor) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 DNA damage induced by Dex was increased after HMGB1 knockdown. a, c: Western blotting was performed to evaluate the expression of the DNA damage and repair related proteins Rad51 (a) and γH2A.X (c), respectively, after HMGB1 knockdown with or without Dex exposure for 48 h; b, d:Densitometric analysis of Rad51 (b) and γH2A.X (d); e: Histograms showing the analysis results of RPMI8226 (transfection with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis induced by Dex (100 μM) in presence of AZD6738 (2 μM, an ATR inhibitor) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)
Fig. 6 DNA damage induced by Dex was increased after HMGB1 knockdown. a, c: Western blotting was performed to evaluate the expression of the DNA damage and repair related proteins Rad51 (a) and γH2A.X (c), respectively, after HMGB1 knockdown with or without Dex exposure for 48 h; b, d:Densitometric analysis of Rad51 (b) and γH2A.X (d); e: Histograms showing the analysis results of RPMI8226 (transfection with control shRNA or HMGB1 shRNA) apoptosis induced by Dex (100 μM) in presence of AZD6738 (2 μM, an ATR inhibitor) (*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 HMGB1 knockdown increased the sensitivity of MM cells to Dex in vivo. a, b: Tumor volume, as measured by Vernier calipers in the four different groups (six mice per group). c, d: Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to detect the expression of HMGB1, DEPTOR, Bcl-2, c-caspase-3,γH2A.X, Rad51 and pAKt(ser473)(magnification: 400×) (*P<0.05)
Fig. 7 HMGB1 knockdown increased the sensitivity of MM cells to Dex in vivo. a, b: Tumor volume, as measured by Vernier calipers in the four different groups (six mice per group). c, d: Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to detect the expression of HMGB1, DEPTOR, Bcl-2, c-caspase-3,γH2A.X, Rad51 and pAKt(ser473)(magnification: 400×) (*P<0.05)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Gay F, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17046. · DOI
  2. Rollig C, Knop S, Bornhauser M. Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2197–208. · DOI
  3. Dingli D, Ailawadhi S, Bergsagel PL, Buadi FK, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, Gertz MA, Gonsalves WI, Hayman SR, Kapoor P, Kourelis T, Kumar SK, Kyle RA, Lacy MQ, Leung N, Lin Y, Lust JA, Mikhael JR, Reeder CB, Roy V, Russell SJ, Sher T, Stewart AK, Warsame R, Zeldenrust SR, Rajkumar SV, Chanan Khan AA. Therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma: Guidelines From the Mayo Stratification for Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(4):578–98. · DOI
  4. Goodwin GH, Johns EW. The isolation and purification of the high mobility group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins. Methods Cell Biol. 1977;16:257–67. · DOI
  5. Kang R, Chen R, Zhang Q, Hou W, Wu S, Cao L, Huang J, Yu Y, Fan XG, Yan Z, Sun X, Wang H, Wang Q, Tsung A, Billiar TR, Zeh HJ 3rd, Lotze MT, Tang D. HMGB1 in health and disease. Mol Asp Med. 2014;40:1–116. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Venereau E, De Leo F, Mezzapelle R, Careccia G, Musco G, Bianchi ME. HMGB1 as biomarker and drug target. Pharmacol Res. 2016;111:534–44. · DOI
  7. Yang H, Antoine DJ, Andersson U, Tracey KJ. The many faces of HMGB1: molecular structure-functional activity in inflammation, apoptosis, and chemotaxis. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93(6):865–73. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Zhu X, Messer JS, Wang Y, Lin F, Cham CM, Chang J, Billiar TR, Lotze MT, Boone DL, Chang EB. Cytosolic HMGB1 controls the cellular autophagy/apoptosis checkpoint during inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(3):1098–110. · DOI
  9. Brezniceanu ML, Volp K, Bosser S, Solbach C, Lichter P, Joos S, Zornig M. HMGB1 inhibits cell death in yeast and mammalian cells and is abundantly expressed in human breast carcinoma. FASEB J. 2003;17(10):1295–7. · DOI
  10. Gnanasekar M, Thirugnanam S, Ramaswamy K. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) constructs targeting high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) expression leads to inhibition of prostate cancer cell survival and apoptosis. Int J Oncol. 2009;34(2):425–31.
  11. Yang L, Yu Y, Kang R, Yang M, Xie M, Wang Z, Tang D, Zhao M, Liu L, Zhang H, Cao L. Up-regulated autophagy by endogenous high mobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistance in leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(2):315–22. · DOI
  12. Mao X-J, Wang G-F, Chen Z-J, Wang L-N, Zhang J-B, Wang H-L. Expression of HMGB1 and its clinical significance in T-cell lymphoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(11):5569–71. · DOI
  13. Wang Z, Zhong J, Inuzuka H, Gao D, Shaik S, Sarkar FH, Wei W. An evolving role for DEPTOR in tumor development and progression. Neoplasia. 2012;14(5):368–75. · DOI
  14. Catena V, Fanciulli M. Deptor: not only a mTOR inhibitor. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):12. · DOI
  15. Mukherjee A, Vasquez KM. HMGB1 interacts with XPA to facilitate the processing of DNA interstrand crosslinks in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(3):1151–60. · DOI
  16. Geric M, Gajski G, Garaj-Vrhovac V. Gamma-H2AX as a biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks in ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;105:13–21. · DOI
  17. Gachechiladze M, Skarda J, Soltermann A, Joerger M. RAD51 as a potential surrogate marker for DNA repair capacity in solid malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(7):1286–94. · DOI
  18. Zhan Z, Li Q, Wu P, Ye Y, Tseng HY, Zhang L, Zhang XD. Autophagy-mediated HMGB1 release antagonizes apoptosis of gastric cancer cells induced by vincristine via transcriptional regulation of Mcl-1. Autophagy. 2012;8(1):109–21. · DOI
  19. Shrivastava S, Mansure JJ, Almajed W, Cury F, Ferbeyre G, Popovic M, Seuntjens J, Kassouf W. The role of HMGB1 in Radioresistance of bladder Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(3):471–9. · DOI
  20. Zhang R, Li Y, Wang Z, Chen L, Dong X, Nie X. Interference with HMGB1 increases the sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs by inhibiting HMGB1-mediated cell autophagy and inducing cell apoptosis. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(11):8585–92. · DOI
  21. Wang Z, Wang X, Li J, Yang C, Xing Z, Chen R, Xu F. HMGB1 knockdown effectively inhibits the progression of rectal cancer by suppressing HMGB1 expression and promoting apoptosis of rectal cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(1):1026–32. · DOI
  22. Chen X, Wang Y, Liu J, Xu P, Zhang XM, Tian YY, Xue YM, Gao XY, Liu Y, Wang JH. Synergistic effect of HMGB1 knockdown and cordycepin in the K562 human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(3):4462–8. · DOI
  23. Oakervee HE, Popat R, Curry N, Smith P, Morris C, Drake M, Agrawal S, Stec J, Schenkein D, Esseltine DL, Cavenagh JD. PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(6):755–62. · DOI
  24. Jagannath S, Durie BG, Wolf J, Camacho E, Irwin D, Lutzky J, McKinley M, Gabayan E, Mazumder A, Schenkein D, Crowley J. Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(6):776–83. · DOI
  25. Peterson TR, Laplante M, Thoreen CC, Sancak Y, Kang SA, Kuehl WM, Gray NS, Sabatini DM. DEPTOR is an mTOR inhibitor frequently overexpressed in multiple myeloma cells and required for their survival. Cell. 2009;137(5):873–86. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Boyd KD, Walker BA, Wardell CP, Ross FM, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. High expression levels of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor DEPTOR are predictive of response to thalidomide in myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(11):2126–9. · DOI
  27. Lamy L. Multiple myeloma and autophagy. Med Sci (Paris). 2013;29(8–9):685–7. · DOI
  28. Thirukkumaran CM, Shi ZQ, Luider J, Kopciuk K, Gao H, Bahlis N, Neri P, Pho M, Stewart D, Mansoor A, Morris DG. Reovirus modulates autophagy during oncolysis of multiple myeloma. Autophagy. 2013;9(3):413–4. · DOI
  29. Shi Y, Daniels-Wells TR, Frost P, Lee J, Finn RS, Bardeleben C, Penichet ML, Jung ME, Gera J, Lichtenstein A. Cytotoxic properties of a DEPTOR-mTOR inhibitor in multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76(19):5822–31. · DOI
  30. Yang Y, Bardeleben C, Frost P, Hoang B, Shi Y, Finn R, Gera J, Lichtenstein A. DEPTOR is linked to a TORC1-p21 survival proliferation pathway in multiple myeloma cells. Genes Cancer. 2014;5(11–12):407–19. · DOI
  31. Zhang HR, Chen JM, Zeng ZY, Que WZ. Knockdown of DEPTOR inhibits cell proliferation and increases chemosensitivity to melphalan in human multiple myeloma RPMI-8226 cells via inhibiting PI3K/AKT activity. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(3):584–95. · DOI
  32. Ran X, Yang J, Liu C, Zhou P, Xiao L, Zhang K. MiR-218 inhibits HMGB1-mediated autophagy in endometrial carcinoma cells during chemotherapy. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(6):6617–26.
  33. Liu Z, Xu Y, Long J, Guo K, Ge C, Du R. microRNA-218 suppresses the proliferation, invasion and promotes apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting HMGB1. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015;27(3):247–57.
  34. Liu L, Yang M, Kang R, Wang Z, Zhao Y, Yu Y, Xie M, Yin X, Livesey KM, Lotze MT, Tang D, Cao L. HMGB1-induced autophagy promotes chemotherapy resistance in leukemia cells. Leukemia. 2011;25(1):23–31. · DOI
  35. Roy M, Liang L, Xiao X, Peng Y, Luo Y, Zhou W, Zhang J, Qiu L, Zhang S, Liu F, Ye M, Liu J. Lycorine downregulates HMGB1 to inhibit autophagy and enhances Bortezomib activity in multiple myeloma. Theranostics. 2016;6(12):2209–24. · DOI
  36. Shammas MA, Shmookler Reis RJ, Koley H, Batchu RB, Li C, Munshi NC. Dysfunctional homologous recombination mediates genomic instability and progression in myeloma. Blood. 2009;113(10):2290–7. · DOI
  37. Gourzones-Dmitriev C, Kassambara A, Sahota S, Reme T, Moreaux J, Bourquard P, Hose D, Pasero P, Constantinou A, Klein B. DNA repair pathways in human multiple myeloma: role in oncogenesis and potential targets for treatment. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(17):2760–73. · DOI
  38. Spanswick VJ, Craddock C, Sekhar M, Mahendra P, Shankaranarayana P, Hughes RG, Hochhauser D, Hartley JA. Repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks as a mechanism of clinical resistance to melphalan in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2002;100(1):224–9. · DOI
  39. Chen Q, Van der Sluis PC, Boulware D, Hazlehurst LA, Dalton WS. The FA/BRCA pathway is involved in melphalan-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair and accounts for melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2005;106(2):698–705. · DOI
  40. Yarde DN, Oliveira V, Mathews L, Wang X, Villagra A, Boulware D, Shain KH, Hazlehurst LA, Alsina M, Chen DT, Beg AA, Dalton WS. Targeting the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway circumvents drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2009;69(24):9367–75. · DOI
  41. Pallier C, Scaffidi P, Chopineau-Proust S, Agresti A, Nordmann P, Bianchi ME, Marechal V. Association of chromatin proteins high mobility group box (HMGB) 1 and HMGB2 with mitotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(8):3414–26. · DOI
  42. Bohlander SK, Kakadia PM. DNA repair and chromosomal translocations. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015;200:1–37. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Guo, X., He, D., Zhang, E., Chen, J., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Yang, L., Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, G., He, J., & Cai, Z.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Cai, Zhen
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
205-205
ISSN
  • 0392-9078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-9966
DOI
10.1186/s13046-018-0883-3
PMC
PMC6114506
OpenAlex
W2888919844
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201868, 81471532, 31311380)
  • Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20120101120100)
  • Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY16H080001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
HMGB1, multiple myeloma, autophagy, DNA repair, dexamethasone, drug resistance, mTOR signaling, apoptosis, prognosis, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Dexamethasone, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Apoptosis, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, HMGB1 Protein, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review