Cited by 58Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFoot and Ankle SurgeryWound Healing and Treatments

A survey of offloading practices for diabetes-related plantar neuropathic foot ulcers.

Open access
Raspovic, Anita, Landorf, Karl B·2014·Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Offloading is key to preventing or healing plantar neuropathic foot ulcers in diabetes. Total contact casts or walkers rendered irremovable are recommended in guidelines as first-line options for offloading, however the use of such devices has been found to be low. This study aimed to investigate offloading practices for diabetes-related plantar neuropathic ulcers. METHODS: An online survey of closed and open-ended questions was administered via SurveyMonkey®. Forty-one podiatrists experienced in high-risk foot practice, from 21 high-risk foot services around Australia, were approached to participate. RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. Participants reported using 21 modalities or combinations of modalities, for offloading this ulcer type. The most frequently used modalities under the forefoot and hallux were felt padding, followed by removable casts or walkers, then non-removable casts or walkers. Participants indicated that many factors were considered when selecting offloading modality, including: compliance, risk of adverse effects, psycho-social factors, restrictions on activities of daily living, work needs and features of the wound. The majority of participants (83%) considered non-removable casts or walkers to be the gold-standard for offloading this ulcer type, however they reported numerous, particularly patient-related, barriers to their use. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting offloading for the management of foot ulceration is complex. Felt padding, not the gold-standard non-removable cast or walker, was reported as the most commonly selected modality for offloading plantar neuropathic ulceration. However, further evaluation of felt padding in high quality clinical trials is required to ascertain its effectiveness for ulcer healing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13047-014-0035-8

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although guidelines recommend regular debridement, defined as weekly or every other week, randomized clinical trials are lacking.

    “Although guidelines recommend regular debridement, defined as weekly or every other week, randomized clinical trials are lacking.52,53”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Conclusions discuss a need for randomized trials of felt-padding offloading, not debridement. Searches for debridement and the claimed weekly or every-other-week schedule found no passage in our copy addressing those points or a lack of debridement trials. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several new topical therapies have been shown to accelerate wound healing in multicenter randomized clinical trials.

    “Several new topical therapies have been shown to accelerate wound healing in multicenter randomized clinical trials.52”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Background and Conclusions discuss faster healing with pressure-offloading devices, not new topical therapies. The Discussion describes limited trial evidence for felt padding. Searches for topical therapies and multicenter randomized trials found no passage addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few data are available regarding the optimal wound dressing for diabetic foot ulcers.

    “Wound Dressings |: Few data are available regarding the optimal wound dressing for diabetic foot ulcers.52,62”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Background and Discussion address evidence for offloading devices and felt padding, not evidence for choosing an optimal wound dressing. A search for wound dressings found only a mention of difficulty with dressing changes; our copy does not address the claimed lack of dressing data. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Debridement is a standardized approach used to facilitate healing.

    “Debridement |: Debridement is a standardized approach used to facilitate healing.52”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Background and Results discuss offloading to promote healing of diabetic foot ulcers, not debridement. A search of our full-text copy for “debridement” found no passage addressing whether it is a standardized approach used to facilitate healing. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Topical oxygen as an adjunct therapy in diabetic foot ulcers may be considered when standard of care alone has failed (<50% of ulcer healed at 4 weeks), based on recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.

    “Topical oxygen as an adjunct therapy in diabetic foot ulcers may be considered when standard of care alone has failed (<50% of ulcer healed at 4 weeks), based on recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.52,72”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Background and Conclusions (page not provided) discuss offloading devices and felt padding, not topical oxygen. Searches for topical oxygen and the <50% healing threshold at four weeks found no passage addressing either point or the claimed recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raspovic, A., & Landorf, K. B.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Raspovic, Anita
Venue
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
35-35
ISSN
1757-1146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104146718
Cited by
58
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Funders
La Trobe University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
offloading, diabetic foot, total contact cast, podiatrists, barriers to treatment, ulcer healing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review