The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endotracheal intubation in the ICU
Open accessAbstract
Endotracheal intubation in the ICU is a high-risk procedure, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Up to 40% of cases are associated with marked hypoxemia or hypotension. The ICU patient is physiologically very different from the usual patient who undergoes intubation in the operating room, and different intubation techniques should be considered. The common operating room practice of sedation and neuromuscular blockade to facilitate intubation may carry significant risk in the ICU patient with a marked oxygenation abnormality, particularly when performed by the non-expert. Preoxygenation is largely ineffective in these patients and oxygen desaturation occurs rapidly on induction of anesthesia, limiting the time available to secure the airway. The ICU environment is less favorable for complex airway management than the operating room, given the frequent lack of availability of additional equipment or additional expert staff. ICU intubations are frequently carried out by trainees, with a lesser degree of airway experience. Even in the presence of a non-concerning airway assessment, these patients are optimally managed as a difficult airway, utilizing an awake approach. Endotracheal intubation may be achieved by awake direct laryngoscopy in the sick ICU patient whose level of consciousness may be reduced by sepsis, hypercapnia or hypoxemia. As the patient's spontaneous respiratory efforts are not depressed by the administration of drugs, additional time is available to obtain equipment and expertise in the event of failure to secure the airway. ICU intubation complications should be tracked as part of the ICU quality improvement process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Success with awake intubation is dependent on meticulous airway topicalization, and in general requires an awake and cooperative patient.
“Success with awake intubation is dependent on meticulous airway topicalization, and in general requires an awake and cooperative patient.72,73”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [73]
The paper’s Abstract says some agitated patients cannot undergo awake intubation and describes using topical anesthetic or a local anesthetic spray in an awake, breathing patient. It does not say success depends on meticulous topicalization or generally requires a fully awake and cooperative patient; it explicitly describes successful awake intubation in ICU patients whose consciousness may be reduced by illness. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:792–9. · DOI
- Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, Sebbane M, Muller L, Chanques G, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:248–55. · DOI
- Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant J, Arich C, Cohendy R, Landreau L, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2355–61. · DOI
- Nolan JP, Kelly FE. Airway challenges in critical care. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:81–92. · DOI
- Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:632–42. · DOI · Paper page
- Benumof JL, Dagg R, Benumof R. Critical hemoglobin desaturation will occur before return to an unparalyzed state following 1 mg/kg intravenous succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:979–82. · DOI
- Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251–70. · DOI
- Ray DC, Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: just say no to drugs (authors reply). Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:287–8. · DOI
- Gupta S, Macneil R, Bryson G. Laryngoscopy in conscious patients with remifentanil: how useful is an ‘awake look’. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:19–24. · DOI
- Fitzgerald E, Hodzovic I, Smith AF. 'From darkness into light': time to make awake intubation with videolaryngoscopy the primary technique for an anticipated difficult airway? Anaesthesia. 2015;70:387–92. · DOI
- Heidegger T, Gerig HJ. Algorithms for management of the difficult airway. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17:483–4. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Lapinsky, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lapinsky, Stephen E.
- ORCID
- Lapinsky, Stephen E.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 258-258
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4470089
- OpenAlex
- W1531905020
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
- Keywords
- endotracheal intubation, critically ill patients, difficult airway management, awake intubation, preoxygenation, hypoxemia, hypotension, sedation, neuromuscular blockade, airway management complications, quality improvement
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Clinical Competence, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Operating Rooms, Respiratory Insufficiency, Critical Illness, Airway Management, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review