The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For complex patients in the intensive care unit or in the operating room, many questions regarding their haemodynamic management cannot be answered with simple clinical examination. In particular, arterial pressure allows only a rough estimation of cardiac output. Transpulmonary thermodilution is a technique that provides a full haemodynamic assessment through cardiac output and other indices. MAIN BODY: Through the analysis of the thermodilution curve recorded at the tip of an arterial catheter after the injection of a cold bolus in the venous circulation, transpulmonary thermodilution intermittently measures cardiac output. This measure allows the calibration of pulse contour analysis. This provides continuous and real time monitoring of cardiac output, which is not possible with the pulmonary artery catheter. Transpulmonary thermodilution provides several variables beyond cardiac output. It estimates the end-diastolic volume of the four cardiac cavities, which is a marker of cardiac preload. It provides an estimation of the systolic function of the combined ventricles. It is more direct than the pulmonary artery catheter, but does not allow the distinct estimation of right and left cardiac function. It is easier and faster to perform than echocardiography, but does not provide a full evaluation of the cardiac structure and function. Transpulmonary thermodilution has the unique advantage of being able to estimate at the bedside extravascular lung water, which quantifies the volume of pulmonary oedema, and pulmonary vascular permeability, which quantifies the degree of a pulmonary capillary leak. Both indices are helpful for guiding fluid strategy, especially in case of acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Transpulmonary thermodilution provides a full cardiovascular evaluation that allows one to answer many questions regarding haemodynamic management. It belongs to the category of "advanced" devices that are indicated for the most critically ill and/or complex patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, Y., Wang, L., Kang, Q., Zhang, X., Yu, G., Wan, X., Wang, J., & Zhu, K. (2017) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000477308 · Cited by 10,679
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The Berlin Definition
(2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5669 · Cited by 8,731
Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Antonelli, M., Beale, R., Bakker, J., Hofer, C., Jaeschke, R., Mebazaa, A., Pinsky, M. R., Teboul, J. L., et al. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationAssessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution
Sakka, S. G., Rühl, C. C., Pfeiffer, U. J., Beale, R., McLuckie, A., Reinhart, K., & Meier-Hellmann, A. (2000) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001340050043 · Cited by 920
Kumar, A., Anel, R., Bunnell, E., Habet, K., Zanotti, S., Marshall, S., Neumann, A., Ali, A., Cheang, M., Kavinsky, C., et al. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000114996.68110.c9 · Cited by 800
Prognostic Value of Extravascular Lung Water in Critically Ill Patients
Sakka, S. G., Klein, M., Reinhart, K., & Meier‐Hellmann, A. (2002) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.122.6.2080 · Cited by 672
Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update
Monnet, X., Marik, P. E., & Teboul, J.-L. (2016) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7 · Cited by 600
Self-citationMitchell, J. P., Schuller, D., Calandrino, F. S., & Schuster, D. P. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.990 · Cited by 587
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study
on behalf of the FENICE Investigators and the ESICM Trial Group, Cecconi, M., Hofer, C., Teboul, J.-L., Pettila, V., Wilkman, E., Molnar, Z., Della Rocca, G., Aldecoa, C., Artigas, A., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x · Cited by 573
Self-citationStetz, C. W., Miller, R. G., Kelly, G. E., & Raffin, T. A. (1982) · PubMed · doi:10.1164/arrd.1982.126.6.1001 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Malbrain, M. L. N. G., Van Regenmortel, N., Saugel, B., De Tavernier, B., Van Gaal, P.-J., Joannes-Boyau, O., Teboul, J.-L., Rice, T. W., Mythen, M., & Monnet, X. (2018) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x · Cited by 632
Self-citationHow can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status?
De Backer, D., Aissaoui, N., Cecconi, M., Chew, M. S., Denault, A., Hajjar, L., Hernandez, G., Messina, A., Myatra, S. N., Ostermann, M., et al. (2022) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-022-06808-9 · Cited by 199
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Monnet, X., & Teboul, J.-L.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-147
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2625069600
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 21.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5
- The paper
- Monnet, X., & Teboul, J.-L. (2017). Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.