Cited by 100Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Quantifying the mapping precision of genome-wide association studies using whole-genome sequencing data

Open access
Wu, Yang, Zheng, Zhili, Visscher, Peter M., Yang, Jian·2017·Genome biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the mapping precision of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), that is the physical distances between the top associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the causal variants, is essential to design fine-mapping experiments for complex traits and diseases. RESULTS: Using simulations based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 3642 unrelated individuals of European descent, we show that the association signals at rare causal variants (minor allele frequency ≤ 0.01) are very unlikely to be mapped to common variants in GWAS using either WGS data or imputed data and vice versa. We predict that at least 80% of the common variants identified from published GWAS using imputed data are within 33.5 Kbp of the causal variants, a resolution that is comparable with that using WGS data. Mapping precision at these loci will improve with increasing sample sizes of GWAS in the future. For rare variants, the mapping precision of GWAS using WGS data is extremely high, suggesting WGS is an efficient strategy to detect and fine-map rare variants simultaneously. We further assess the mapping precision by linkage disequilibrium between GWAS hits and causal variants and develop an online tool (gwasMP) to query our results with different thresholds of physical distance and/or linkage disequilibrium ( http://cnsgenomics.com/shiny/gwasMP ). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a benchmark to inform future design and development of fine-mapping experiments and technologies to pinpoint the causal variants at GWAS loci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-017-1216-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y., Zheng, Z., Visscher, P. M., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Yang, Jian
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2017-05-16
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
86-86
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2612591211
Cited by
100
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP160101343)
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1078037 and 1113400)
  • Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation (Senior Medical Research Fellowship)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1107258)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
genome-wide association study, fine mapping, causal variants, rare variants, common genetic variants, linkage disequilibrium, whole genome sequencing, imputation, physical distance, sample size, European ancestry
MeSH terms
Alleles, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Sample Size, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review