Cited by 24Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

CMOT: cross-modality optimal transport for multimodal inference

Open access
Alatkar, Sayali Anil, Wang, Daifeng·2023·Genome biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Multimodal measurements of single-cell sequencing technologies facilitate a comprehensive understanding of specific cellular and molecular mechanisms. However, simultaneous profiling of multiple modalities of single cells is challenging, and data integration remains elusive due to missing modalities and cell-cell correspondences. To address this, we developed a computational approach, Cross-Modality Optimal Transport (CMOT), which aligns cells within available multi-modal data (source) onto a common latent space and infers missing modalities for cells from another modality (target) of mapped source cells. CMOT outperforms existing methods in various applications from developing brain, cancers to immunology, and provides biological interpretations improving cell-type or cancer classifications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-023-02989-8

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A contrastive loss brings related modality pairs closer and distances unrelated pairs in a shared embedding space.

    “The model is trained using a contrastive loss function to bring related modality pairs, like images and descriptions, closer in a shared embedding space while distancing unrelated pairs [179,180].”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [179]

    The Methods section (page unavailable) says CMOT projects modalities into a common manifold and minimizes distances between corresponding samples. It describes manifold alignment and optimal transport, not a contrastive loss that distances unrelated pairs; its examples concern single-cell modalities, not images and descriptions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [36]Kantorovitch L. On the Translocation of Masses. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626967.
  2. [38]Flamary R, et al. POT: Python Optimal Transport. J Mach Learn Res. 2021;22(78):1–8.
  3. [40]Pedregosa et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. JMLR 12. Available: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/about.html#citing-scikit-learn.
  4. [45]Keahey K, Anderson JH, Zhen Z, Riteau P, Ruth P, Stanzione DC, et al. “Lessons Learned from the Chameleon Testbed.” USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 2020.
  5. [46]Alatkar SA, Wang D. CMOT: Cross Modality Optimal Transport for multimodal inference. Available: https://github.com/daifengwanglab/CMOT. PMC10334579 37434182
  6. [49]Chen S, Lake BB, Zhang K. High-throughput sequencing of the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility in the same cell. Gene Expression Omnibus. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE126074. PMC6893138 31611697
  7. [50]Cao J, Cusanovich DA, Ramani V, Aghamirzaie D et al. Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells. Gene Expression Omnibus. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE117089. PMC6571013 30166440

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alatkar, S. A., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Daifeng
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2023-07-11
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
163-163
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W4383878671
Cited by
24
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2144475)
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Waisman Center (P50HD105353)
  • National Institutes of Health (1r21ns128761-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG067025)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH116492)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21CA237955)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS128761, R03NS123969, R21NS127432)
  • Division of Graduate Education
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD105353)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
multimodal single-cell data, cell alignment, latent space embedding, data integration, cell type classification, cancer classification
MeSH terms
Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review